Différence et répétition
01 Jan 2013-
About: The article was published on 2013-01-01. It has received 584 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Repetition (rhetorical device).
Citations
More filters
Posted Content•
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the performativity of economics and propose theoretical directions to study it from a sociological perspective, and discuss the performance of economics from a social point of view.
Abstract: (Discusses the performativity of economics and proposes theoretical directions to study it from a sociological perspective.)
990 citations
Cites background from "Différence et répétition"
...In one case, framing (and repetitions) prevail, whereas in the second case overflowing (and differences) impose their destabilizing logic (Deleuze 1968). according to it....
[...]
...In one case, framing (and repetitions) prevail, whereas in the second case overflowing (and differences) impose their destabilizing logic (Deleuze 1968)....
[...]
361 citations
01 Jan 2013
TL;DR: The double mouvement is the fruit of the focalisation of la statistique contemporaine sur les relations as mentioned in this paper, which is the basis of the double mousvement of the GALA.
Abstract: La gouvernementalite algorithmique se caracterise notamment par le double mouvement suivant : a) l’abandon de toute forme d’« echelle », d’« etalon », de hierarchie, au profit d’une normativite immanente et evolutive en temps reel, dont emerge un « double statistique » du monde et qui semble faire table rase des anciennes hierarchies dessinee par l’homme normal ou l’homme moyen ; b) l’evitement de toute confrontation avec les individus dont les occasions de subjectivation se trouvent rarefiees.Ce double mouvement nous parait le fruit de la focalisation de la statistique contemporaine sur les relations. Nous tentons d’evaluer dans quelle mesure ces deux aspects de la « gouvernementalite algorithmique » ainsi dessinee, avec l’appui qu’elle se donne sur les seules relations, pourraient etre favorables, d’une part, a des processus d’individuation par la relation (Simondon) et, d’autre part, a l’emergence de formes de vie nouvelles sous la forme du depassement du plan d’organisation par le plan d’immanence (Deleuze-Guattari). Par cette confrontation aux principales philosophies contemporaines de la relation, il apparait alors qu’une pensee du devenir et des processus d’individuation par la relation reclame necessairement du « disparate » - une heterogeneite des ordres de grandeur, une multiplicite des regimes d’existence - que la gouvernementalite algorithmique ne cesse precisement d’etouffer en cloturant le reel (numerise) sur lui-meme. La gouvernementalite algorithmique tend plutot a forclore de telles perspectives d’emancipation en repliant les processus d’individuation sur la monade subjective.
261 citations
Cites background from "Différence et répétition"
...…comme l’acte de solution d’un tel problème, ou, ce qui revient au même, comme l’actualisation du potentiel et la mise en communication des disparates” (Deleuze, 1968, p. 317). connaissance véritable des finalités recherchées par cette collecte d’information, c’est-à-dire des usages auxquelles…...
[...]
TL;DR: This paper examined the intellectual, cultural, institutional, and social conditions of the legitimation of Derrida's work in two cultural markets as different as France and the United States and developed hypotheses about the process of legitimacy of interpretive theories.
Abstract: How can an interpretive theory gain legitimacy in two cultural markets as different as France and the United States? This study examines the intellectual, cultural, institutional, and social conditions of legitimation of Jacques Derrida's work in the two countries and develops hypotheses about the process of legitimation of interpretive theories. The legitimation of Derrida's work resulted from a fit between it and highly structured cultural and institutional systems. In France, Derrida capitalized on the structure of the intellectual market by targeting his work to a large cultural public rather than to a shrinking group of academic philosophers. His work appealed to the intellectual public as a status symbol and as a novel and sophisticated way to deal with late 1960s politics. In the United States, Derrida and a group of prestigious literary critics reframed his theory and disseminated it in university departments of literature. His work was imported concurrently with the work of other French scholars ...
255 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider health and issues of embodiment through the prism of the body-without-organs (BwO) framework of theory and suggest the importance of a collaborative approach to illness, health and health care.
Abstract: This article considers ‘health’ and issues of embodiment through the prism of Deleuze and Guattari’s framework of theory. Deleuze and Guattari speak of an embodied subjectivity, a ‘body-without-organs’ (BwO), which is the outcome of a dynamic tension between culture and biology. This BwO – or ‘body-self’– is a limit, the outcome of physical, psychological and social ‘territorialization’, but which may be ‘deterritorialized’ to open up new possibilities for embodied subjectivity. The question ‘what can a body do?’ is posed to address issues of health and illness. The physical, psychological, emotional and social relations of body-self together comprise the limit of a person’s embodied subjectivity, and as such delimit its ‘health’. ‘Illness’ is a further limiting of these relations, while health care may offer the potential to de-territorialize these relations, opening up new possibilities. This model suggests the importance of a collaborative approach to illness, health and health care.
104 citations