scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Dihydroceramide accumulation mediates cytotoxic autophagy of cancer cells via autolysosome destabilization.

TL;DR: It is shown that THC (but not nutrient deprivation) increases the dihydroceramide:ceramide ratio in the endoplasmic reticulum of glioma cells, and this alteration is directed to autophagosomes and autolysosomes to promote lysosomal membrane permeabilization, cathepsin release and the subsequent activation of apoptotic cell death.
Abstract: Autophagy is considered primarily a cell survival process, although it can also lead to cell death. However, the factors that dictate the shift between these 2 opposite outcomes remain largely unknown. In this work, we used Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, the main active component of marijuana, a compound that triggers autophagy-mediated cancer cell death) and nutrient deprivation (an autophagic stimulus that triggers cytoprotective autophagy) to investigate the precise molecular mechanisms responsible for the activation of cytotoxic autophagy in cancer cells. By using a wide array of experimental approaches we show that THC (but not nutrient deprivation) increases the dihydroceramide:ceramide ratio in the endoplasmic reticulum of glioma cells, and this alteration is directed to autophagosomes and autolysosomes to promote lysosomal membrane permeabilization, cathepsin release and the subsequent activation of apoptotic cell death. These findings pave the way to clarify the regulatory mechanisms that determine the selective activation of autophagy-mediated cancer cell death.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Autophagy
ISSN: 1554-8627 (Print) 1554-8635 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/kaup20
Dihydroceramide accumulation mediates cytotoxic
autophagy of cancer cells via autolysosome
destabilization
Sonia Hernández-Tiedra, Gemma Fabriàs, David Dávila, Íñigo J. Salanueva,
Josefina Casas, L. Ruth Montes, Zuriñe Antón, Elena García-Taboada, María
Salazar-Roa, Mar Lorente, Jesper Nylandsted, Jane Armstrong, Israel López-
Valero, Christopher S. McKee, Ana Serrano-Puebla, Roberto García-López,
José González-Martínez, José L. Abad, Kentaro Hanada, Patricia Boya,
Félix Goñi, Manuel Guzmán, Penny Lovat, Marja Jäättelä, Alicia Alonso &
Guillermo Velasco
To cite this article: Sonia Hernández-Tiedra, Gemma Fabriàs, David Dávila, Íñigo J. Salanueva,
Josefina Casas, L. Ruth Montes, Zuriñe Antón, Elena García-Taboada, María Salazar-Roa,
Mar Lorente, Jesper Nylandsted, Jane Armstrong, Israel López-Valero, Christopher S. McKee,
Ana Serrano-Puebla, Roberto García-López, José González-Martínez, José L. Abad, Kentaro
Hanada, Patricia Boya, Félix Goñi, Manuel Guzmán, Penny Lovat, Marja Jäättelä, Alicia
Alonso & Guillermo Velasco (2016) Dihydroceramide accumulation mediates cytotoxic
autophagy of cancer cells via autolysosome destabilization, Autophagy, 12:11, 2213-2229, DOI:
10.1080/15548627.2016.1213927
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2016.1213927
© 2016 The Author(s). Published with
license by Taylor & Francis.© Sonia
Hernández-Tiedra, Gemma Fabrias, David
Dávila, Íñigo J. Salanueva, Josefina Casas, L.
Ruth Montes, Zuriñe Antón, Elena Garcıa-
Taboada, María Salazar-Roa, Mar Lorente,
Jesper Nylandsted, Jane Armstrong, Israel
López-Valero, Christopher S. McKee, Ana
Serrano-Puebla, Roberto García-López, José
González-Martínez, José L. Abad, Kentaro
Hanada, Patricia Boya, Felix Goñi, Manuel
Guzman, Penny Lovat, Marja Jäättelä, Alicia
Alonso, and Guillermo Velasco.
View supplementary material
Published online: 16 Sep 2016.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 2834
View related articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=kaup20
Download by: [CSIC Centro de Investigaciones Biologicas] Date: 02 February 2017, At: 05:19
View Crossmark data
Citing articles: 1 View citing articles

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH PAPER
Dihydroceramide accumulation mediates cytotoxic autophagy of cancer cells via
autolysosome destabilization
Sonia Hern
andez-Tiedra
a
,
b
, Gemma Fabri
as
c
, David D
avila
a
,
b
,
I
~
nigo J. Salanueva
a
, Josena Casas
c
, L. Ruth Montes
d
,
Zuri
~
ne Ant
on
d
, Elena Garc
ıa-Taboada
a
, Mar
ıa Salazar-Roa
a
, Mar Lorente
a
,
b
, Jesper Nylandsted
e
, Jane Armstrong
f
,
g
,
Israel L
opez-Valero
a
,
b
, Christopher S. McKee
f
, Ana Serrano-Puebla
a
,
h
, Roberto Garc
ıa-L
opez
a
, Jos
e Gonz
alez-Mart
ınez
a
,
b
,
Jos
e L. Abad
c
, Kentaro Hanada
i
, Patricia Boya
h
,F
elix Go
~
ni
d
, Manuel Guzm
an
a
,
j
, Penny Lovat
f
, Marja J
a
attel
a
e
,
Alicia Alonso
d
, and Guillermo Velasco
a
,
b
a
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, School of Biology, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain;
b
Instituto de Investigaciones
Sanitarias San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain;
c
Research Unit on BioActive Molecules (RUBAM), Departments of Biomedicinal Chemistry, Institute for
Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain;
d
Biosika Institute (UPV/EHU, CSIC), and Departamento de Bioqu
ımica, Universidad del
Pa
ıs Vasco, Barrio Sarriena s/n, Leioa, Spain;
e
Unit of Cell Death and Metabolism, Center for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease, Danish Cancer Society
Research Center (DCRC), Copenhagen, Denmark;
f
Dermatological Sciences, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
UK;
g
Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK;
h
Departament of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigaciones
Biol
ogicas, CSIC, Madrid, Spain;
i
Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan;
j
Centro de Investigaci
on Biom
edica en Red Sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Instituto Ram
on y Cajal de Investigaci
on Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain,
Instituto Universitario de Investigaci
on Neuroqu
ımica, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
ARTICLE HISTORY
Received 21 October 2015
Revised 21 June 2016
Accepted 13 July 2016
ABSTRACT
Autophagy is considered primarily a cell survival process, although it can also lead to cell death. However,
the factors that dictate the shift between these 2 opposite outcomes remain largely unknown. In this
work, we used D
9
-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC, the main active component of marijuana, a compound that
triggers autophagy-mediated cancer cell death) and nutrient deprivation (an autophagic stimulus that
triggers cytoprotective autophagy) to investigate the precise molecular mechanisms responsible for the
activation of cytotoxic autophagy in cancer cells. By using a wide array of experimental approaches we
show that THC (but not nutrient deprivation) increases the dihydroceramide:ceramide ratio in the
endoplasmic reticulum of glioma cells, and this alteration is directed to autophagosomes and
autolysosomes to promote lysosomal membrane permeabilization, cathepsin release and the subsequent
activation of apoptotic cell death. These ndings pave the way to clarify the regulatory mechanisms that
determine the selective activation of autophagy-mediated cancer cell death.
KEYWORDS
autophagy; cancer;
cannabinoids; cell death;
sphingolipids
Introduction
Macroautophagy, hereafter named autophagy, is a highly con-
served cellular process in which cytoplasmic materials, including
organelles, are sequestered into double-membrane compart-
ments, phagophores, that mature into autophagosomes; the
cargo is subsequently delivered to lysosomes for degradation
and recycling.
1-3
In many cellular settings, triggering of auto-
phagy relies on the inhibition of MTORC1 (mechanistic target
of rapamycin [serine/threonine kinase] complex 1), an event
that promotes the activation (de-inhibition) of several ATG
(autophagy-related) proteins involved in the initial phase of
phagophore formation.
1-3
The membrane source from which
autophagosomes are derived is still debatable, as it has been pro-
posed that it could be derived either from de novo synthesized
lipids or generated by vesicle budding from the endoplasmic
reticulum (ER), Golgi apparatus or endosomes,
4,5
or the plasma
membrane.
6
In particular, an ER-derived structure termed the
omegasome has been proposed as an origin of the phagophore
membrane.
5,7
Enlargement of this compartment to form the
autophagosome requires the participation of 2 ubiquitin-like
conjugation systems, one involving the conjugation of ATG12
(autophagy-related 12) to ATG5 (autophagy-related 5), and the
other of phosphatidylethanolamine to MAP1LC3/LC3 (microtu-
bule-associated protein 1 light chain 3).
2
The nal outcome of
the activation of the autophagy program is highly dependent on
the cellular context and the strength and duration of the stress-
inducing signals. Thus, autophagy plays an important role in
cellular homeostasis and is considered primarily a cell-survival
mechanism, for example in situations of nutrient deprivation.
8-11
However, stimulation of autophagy can also have a cytotoxic
effect. For example, several anticancer agents activate auto-
phagy-associated cell death.
8-10,12
However, the molecular
CONTACT Guillermo Velasco gvelasco@ucm.es Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, School of Biology, Complutense University Calle Jos
e
Antonio Nov
ais 12, 28040-Madrid, Spain.
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publishers website.
© 2016 Sonia Hern
andez-Tiedra, Gemma Fabrias, David D
avila,
I
~
nigo J. Salanueva, Josena Casas, L. Ruth Montes, Zuri
~
ne Ant
on, Elena Garcıa-Taboada, Mar
ıa Salazar-Roa, Mar Lorente, Jesper
Nylandsted, Jane Armstrong, Israel L
opez-Valero, Christopher S. McKee, Ana Serrano-Puebla, Roberto Garc
ıa-L
opez, Jos
e Gonz
alez-Mart
ınez, Jos
e L. Abad, Kentaro Hanada, Patricia Boya, Felix
Go
~
ni, Manuel Guzman, Penny Lovat, Marja J
a
attel
a, Alicia Alonso, and Guillermo Velasco. Published with license by Taylor & Francis.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribu-
tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
AUTOPHAGY
2016, VOL. 12, NO. 11, 2213 2229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2016.1213927

mechanisms that determine the outcome of autophagy activa-
tion for the survival or death of cancer cells remain to be
claried.
D
9
-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the main active compo-
nent of Cannabis sativa,
13,14
exerts a wide variety of biological
effects by mimicking endogeno us substancesthe endocanna-
binoids anandamide
15
and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG)
16,17
that engage specic cell-surface G protein-coupled cannabinoid
receptors.
14
So far, 2 major cannabinoid-specic receptors,
CNR1/CB
1
(cannabinoid receptor 1 [brain]) and CNR2/CB
2
(cannabinoid receptor 2 [macrop hage]), have been cloned and
characterized from mammalian tissues.
18,19
Cannabinoid
administration curbs the growth of several genetic and xeno-
graft models of cancer in rats and mice, and therefore these
compounds are considered a novel family of potential antican-
cer agents.
20
The mechanism of cannabinoid anticancer action
relies, at least largely, on the ability of these agent s to stimulate
autophagy-mediated cancer cell death.
20
Thus, THC binds can-
nabinoid receptors, which leads to the stimulation of de novo
sphingolipid synthesis and the subsequent activation of an
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-related signaling route that
involves the upregulation of the transcriptional co-activator
NUPR1/p8 (nuclear protein 1, transcriptional regulator) and
its effector TRIB3 (tribbles pseudokinase 3).
20-23
The stimula-
tion of this pathway promotes in turn autophagy via
TRIB3-mediated inhibition of the AKT (thymoma viral proto-
oncogene)-MTORC1 axis, which is indispensable for the pro-
apoptotic and antitumoral action of cannabinoids.
24,25
In this study, we have investigated the molecular mechanism
underlying the activation of autophagy-mediated cancer cell death
by comparing the effects of THC treatment and nutrient depriva-
tion, 2 autophagic stimuli that produce opposite effects on the reg-
ulation of cancer cell survival/death. Using this experimental
model, we found that treatment with THCbut not exposure to
nutrient deprivationleads to an alteration of the balance
between different molecular species of ceramides and dihydrocer-
amides in the microsomal (endoplasmic reticulum-enriched) frac-
tion of cancer cells. Moreover, our ndings support the hypothesis
that such modication can be transmitted to autophagosomes and
autolysosomes, where it can promote the permeabilization of the
organellar membrane, the release of cathepsins to the cytoplasm
and the subsequent activation of apoptotic cell death.
Results
THC-induced, but not nutrient deprivation-induced,
autophagy relies on the stimulation of sphingolipid
biosynthesis
As a rst approach to investigate the molecular mechanisms
responsible for the activation of autophagy-mediated cancer
cell death we analyzed the effect of 2 different stimuli, namely
nutrient deprivation and THC treatment, that trigger cytopro-
tective and cytotoxic autophagy, respectively. We found that
genetic inhibition of the autophagy essential gene ATG5 in
both U87MG cells and oncogene-transformed mouse embry-
onic broblasts (MEFs) prevented THC-induced cell death
while it further diminished the nutrient deprivation-induced
decrease in cell viability (
Fig. 1A and Fig. S1A), thus supporting
the notion that stimulation of autophagy may play a dual role
in the regulation of cancer cell survival.
After conrming that incubation with EBSS and treatment
with THC led to an increase in the accumulation of
MAP1LC3B-positive dots in U87MG cells (Fig. S1B) we ana-
lyzed the ability of these 2 stimuli to enhance the autophagic ux
in U87MG cells. To this aim, we performed the treatments in the
presence or the absence of the lysosomal proteases inhibitors
E64d and pepstatin A (C inh); upon stimulation of dynamic
autophagy and in the presence of these inhibitors there is a
blockade of the autophagic ux and therefore an enhanced accu-
mulation of proteins present in the autophagosomes, and speci-
cally of the lipidated and autophagosome-associated form of
MAP1LC3, MAP1LC3-II. Of note, incubation with EBSS
induced only an early and transient increase in the autophagic
ux (EBSS led to MAP1LC3B-II accumulation, an event that was
enhanced in the presence of E64d C pepstatin A;
Fig. 1A lower
panel
, Fig. 1B and Fig. S1C) whereas stimulation of the autopha-
gic ux by THC occurred at longer times and was sustained for
several hours (
Fig. 1A lower panel, Fig. 1B and Fig. S1C).
Previous reports by our group show that the stimulation of
sphingolipid biosynthesis by THC is involved in the induction
of autophagy-mediated cancer cell death.
20,21,24,26,27
In agre e-
ment with these observations, we found here that THC upregu-
lates mRNA levels of different enzymes involved in
sphingolipid synthesis de novo, an effect that was not observed
when cells were exposed to EBSS (
Fig. 1C). Likewise, pharma-
cological blockade (by using ISP-1) of SPT (serine palmitoyl-
transferase), the enzyme that catalyzes the rst step of
sphingolipid biosynthesis, prevented THC-, but not nutrient
deprivation-induce d autophagy (
Fig. 1D). In addition, we con-
rmed that, in agreement with previous observations,
22,24,27
incubation w ith ISP-1 inhibited THC-evoked cell death
(Fig. S1D). Collectively, these results suggest that a general
increase in de novo-synthesized sphingolipids might be a differ-
ential factor in the activation of cytotoxic autophagy by THC.
THC, but not nutrient deprivation, enhances sphingolipid
synthesis de novo and dihydroceramide accumulation
The initial steps of sphingolipid biosynthesis occur at the ER,
28
where ceramides are synthesized (Fig. 2A). Therefore, as a rst
approach to investigate the effect of THC and nutrient depriva-
tion on sphingolipid metabolism, we analyzed the sphin golipid
composition of the microsomal fraction of U87MG cells sub-
jected to ei ther stimulus. As shown in
Fig. 2B, THC but not
incubation with EBSSincreased cerami de levels in the micro-
somal fraction of U87MG cells. We also found that THC but
not EBSS enhanced the levels of dihydr oceramides to a higher
extent than those of ceramides (
Fig. 2B and Fig. 2C). DEGS1/
dihydroceramide desaturase (delta[4]-desaturase, sphingolipid
1) catalyzes the insertion of a 4,5-trans double bond in the
sphingoid backbone of dihydroceramides to generate ceramides
(see
Fig. 2A).
28
Specically, treatment with THC produced a
2.8-, 2.9- and 4.5-fold increase in the levels of C16, C24 and
C24:1 dihydroceramides, respectively, and a 1.3- and 1.2-fold
increase in the levels of C24 and C24:1 ceramides, respectively
(Fig. S2). It should be noted that ceramide levels were 6- to 10-
fold higher than those of dihydroceramides in vehicle-treated
2214
S. HERN
ANDEZ-TIEDRA ET AL.

cells (Fig. 2C and Table S1). Thus, the observed increase in
dihydroceramides levels triggered by THC led to a striking
modication of the ceramide:dihydroceramide ratio in the
microsomal fraction of U87MG cells (
Fig. 2D).
THC, but not nutrient deprivation, inhibits sphingolipid
transport from the ER to the Golgi
Once synthesized in the ER, ceramides can be delivered via
vesicular transport or through the ceramide transporter protein
COL4A3BP/CERT (collagen, type IV, a 3 [Goodpasture anti-
gen] binding protein)
29
to the Golgi apparatus, where the
synthesis of sphingomyelin and complex glycosphingolipids
takes place.
28
One way to approach the analysis of this process is
to follow the subcellular distribution of uorescent dye-conju-
gated ceramides, for example BODIPY C5 ceramide. Thus,
when added to cells, BODIPY C5 ceramide is endocytosed and
rapidly transported to the Golgi. We therefore monitored BOD-
IPY C5 ceramide distribution to analyze the effect of THC on
ceramide transport from the ER to the Golgi. As shown in
Fig. 3A, BODIPY C5 ceramide was located in perinuclear struc-
tures resembling the Golgi apparatus in U87MG cells treated
with vehicle or subjected to nutrient deprivation. In contrast,
THC treatment induced a particulate distribution of BODIPY
Figure 1. THC, but not nutrient deprivation, -induced autophagy relies on the stimulation of sphingolipid biosynthesis. (A) Upper panel: Effect of THC (4 m M, 18 h) and
incubation with EBSS (18 h) on the number of U87MG cells stably transfected with control (shC) or ATG5-selective (shATG5) shRNAs as estimated by the MTT test (n D 4;
mean § s.d;

, P < 0.01 from THC-treated or EBSS-incubated U87 shC cells). Lower panel: Effect of THC (4 mM) and incubation with EBSS on the induction of autophagy
(as determined by MAP1LC3B-II lipidation in the presence of E64d, 10 mM; and pepstatin A, 10 mg/ml [Cinh]) of U87 cells stably transfected with control (U87 shC) or
ATG5-selective (shATG5) shRNAs (n D 3, a representative experiment is shown). ATG5 mRNA levels (as determined by real-time quantitative PCR) were reduced by
85 § 3% on U87shATG5 cells when compared with U87shC cells; (n D 4). Values in the bottom of the western blots correspond to the fold change in the MAP1LC3B-II to
TUBA1A ratio relative to shC U87MG cells at the initial time point of the treatments. Nd, nondetectable. (B) Effect of THC (4 mM, 1 h, 3 h and 6 h) and incubation with EBSS
(i.e., nutrient deprivation, 1, 3 and 6 h) on the induction of autophagy (as determined by MAP1LC3B-II lipidation in the presence of E64d, 10 mM; and pepstatin A, 10 mg/
ml [Cinh]) of U87MG cells (n D 3, a representative experiment is shown). (C) Effect of THC (4 mM; 3 h) on the mRNA levels (as determined by quantitative real-time PCR)
of different enzymes involved in sphingolipid biosynthesis (CERS2; CERS5; CERS6 (ceramide synthase 2, 5 and 6), DEGS1/dihydroceramide desaturase (delta[4]-desaturase,
sphingolipid 1) and SPTLC1 (serine palmitoyltransferase long chain base subunit 1) of U87MG cells (n D 5;
, P < 0.05;

, P < 0.01 from Veh-treated cells). (D) Effect of
THC (4 mM), ISP-1 (5 mM) and incubation with EBSS on autophagy (18 h) (as determined by MAP1LC3B immunostaining). Note that incubation with ISP-1 prevents THC
but not starvation-induced autophagy of U87MG cells. Values correspond to the percentage of cells with MAP1LC3B dots relative to the total cell number of cells § s.d;
n D 3.
, P < 0.05;

, P < 0.01 from Veh-treated cells and
#
, P < 0.05 from THC- and EBSS-treated cells. Bar: 20 mm.
AUTOPHAGY 2215

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

1,129 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These results highlight critical roles for bioactive sphingolipids in most, if not all, major cell biological responses, including all major cell signalling pathways, and they link sphingoipid metabolism to key human diseases.
Abstract: Studies of bioactive lipids in general and sphingolipids in particular have intensified over the past several years, revealing an unprecedented and unanticipated complexity of the lipidome and its many functions, which rivals, if not exceeds, that of the genome or proteome. These results highlight critical roles for bioactive sphingolipids in most, if not all, major cell biological responses, including all major cell signalling pathways, and they link sphingolipid metabolism to key human diseases. Nevertheless, the fairly nascent field of bioactive sphingolipids still faces challenges in its biochemical and molecular underpinnings, including defining the molecular mechanisms of pathway and enzyme regulation, the study of lipid-protein interactions and the development of cellular probes, suitable biomarkers and therapeutic approaches.

1,025 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: How ceramide-induced cellular stress mediates cancer cell death through various mechanisms involving the induction of apoptosis, necroptosis and/or mitophagy is summarized.
Abstract: Sphingolipids, including the two central bioactive lipids ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), have opposing roles in regulating cancer cell death and survival, respectively, and there have been exciting developments in understanding how sphingolipid metabolism and signalling regulate these processes in response to anticancer therapy. Recent studies have provided mechanistic details of the roles of sphingolipids and their downstream targets in the regulation of tumour growth and response to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and/or immunotherapy using innovative molecular, genetic and pharmacological tools to target sphingolipid signalling nodes in cancer cells. For example, structure-function-based studies have provided innovative opportunities to develop mechanism-based anticancer therapeutic strategies to restore anti-proliferative ceramide signalling and/or inhibit pro-survival S1P-S1P receptor (S1PR) signalling. This Review summarizes how ceramide-induced cellular stress mediates cancer cell death through various mechanisms involving the induction of apoptosis, necroptosis and/or mitophagy. Moreover, the metabolism of ceramide for S1P biosynthesis, which is mediated by sphingosine kinase 1 and 2, and its role in influencing cancer cell growth, drug resistance and tumour metastasis through S1PR-dependent or receptor-independent signalling are highlighted. Finally, studies targeting enzymes involved in sphingolipid metabolism and/or signalling and their clinical implications for improving cancer therapeutics are also presented.

652 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Which forms of cell death occur in stroke and Alzheimer's disease are reassess, and why it has been so difficult to pinpoint the type of neuronal death involved is discussed.
Abstract: Neuronal cell death occurs extensively during development and pathology, where it is especially important because of the limited capacity of adult neurons to proliferate or be replaced. The concept of cell death used to be simple as there were just two or three types, so we just had to work out which type was involved in our particular pathology and then block it. However, we now know that there are at least a dozen ways for neurons to die, that blocking a particular mechanism of cell death may not prevent the cell from dying, and that non-neuronal cells also contribute to neuronal death. We review here the mechanisms of neuronal death by intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis, oncosis, necroptosis, parthanatos, ferroptosis, sarmoptosis, autophagic cell death, autosis, autolysis, paraptosis, pyroptosis, phagoptosis, and mitochondrial permeability transition. We next explore the mechanisms of neuronal death during development, and those induced by axotomy, aberrant cell-cycle reentry, glutamate (excitoxicity and oxytosis), loss of connected neurons, aggregated proteins and the unfolded protein response, oxidants, inflammation, and microglia. We then reassess which forms of cell death occur in stroke and Alzheimer's disease, two of the most important pathologies involving neuronal cell death. We also discuss why it has been so difficult to pinpoint the type of neuronal death involved, if and why the mechanism of neuronal death matters, the molecular overlap and interplay between death subroutines, and the therapeutic implications of these multiple overlapping forms of neuronal death.

650 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Dec 2018-Traffic
TL;DR: A variety of therapeutic strategies that seek to either destabilize lysosomes or to maintain, enhance or restore lysOSomal function are reviewed.
Abstract: Lysosomes are membrane-enclosed organelles that mediate the intracellular degradation of macromolecules. They play an essential role in calcium regulation and have emerged as key signaling hubs in controlling the nutrient response. Maintaining lysosomal integrity and function is therefore crucial for cellular homeostasis. Different forms of stress can induce lysosomal membrane permeabilization (LMP), resulting in the translocation to the cytoplasm of intralysosomal components, such as cathepsins, inducing lysosomal-dependent cell death (LDCD). Here, we review recent advances that have furthered our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of LMP and the methods used to detect it. We discuss several endolysosomal damage-response mechanisms that mediate the repair or elimination of compromised lysosomes and summarize the role of LMP and cathepsins in LDCD and other cell death pathways. Finally, with the emergence of lysosomes as promising therapeutic targets for several human diseases, we review a variety of therapeutic strategies that seek to either destabilize lysosomes or to maintain, enhance or restore lysosomal function.

336 citations


Cites background from "Dihydroceramide accumulation mediat..."

  • ...As lysosomes are the executors of the autophagy pathway, the inhibition of lysosomal activity may protect against cell death regulated by autophagy proteins.(128,129) While in most circumstances, autophagy is a cytoprotective pathway, in several pathophysiological conditions, autophagy contributes to cell death....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
18 Dec 1992-Science
TL;DR: In this article, an arachidonylethanthanolamide (anandamide) was identified in a screen for endogenous ligands for the cannabinoid receptor and its structure was determined by mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and confirmed by synthesis.
Abstract: Arachidonylethanolamide, an arachidonic acid derivative in porcine brain, was identified in a screen for endogenous ligands for the cannabinoid receptor. The structure of this compound, which has been named "anandamide," was determined by mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and was confirmed by synthesis. Anandamide inhibited the specific binding of a radiolabeled cannabinoid probe to synaptosomal membranes in a manner typical of competitive ligands and produced a concentration-dependent inhibition of the electrically evoked twitch response to the mouse vas deferens, a characteristic effect of psychotropic cannabinoids. These properties suggest that anandamide may function as a natural ligand for the cannabinoid receptor.

5,283 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
09 Aug 1990-Nature
TL;DR: The cloning and expression of a complementary DNA that encodes a G protein-coupled receptor that is involved in cannabinoid-induced CNS effects (including alterations in mood and cognition) experienced by users of marijuana are suggested.
Abstract: Marijuana and many of its constituent cannabinoids influence the central nervous system (CNS) in a complex and dose-dependent manner. Although CNS depression and analgesia are well documented effects of the cannabinoids, the mechanisms responsible for these and other cannabinoid-induced effects are not so far known. The hydrophobic nature of these substances has suggested that cannabinoids resemble anaesthetic agents in their action, that is, they nonspecifically disrupt cellular membranes. Recent evidence, however, has supported a mechanism involving a G protein-coupled receptor found in brain and neural cell lines, and which inhibits adenylate cyclase activity in a dose-dependent, stereoselective and pertussis toxin-sensitive manner. Also, the receptor is more responsive to psychoactive cannabinoids than to non-psychoactive cannabinoids. Here we report the cloning and expression of a complementary DNA that encodes a G protein-coupled receptor with all of these properties. Its messenger RNA is found in cell lines and regions of the brain that have cannabinoid receptors. These findings suggest that this protein is involved in cannabinoid-induced CNS effects (including alterations in mood and cognition) experienced by users of marijuana.

4,806 citations


"Dihydroceramide accumulation mediat..." refers background in this paper

  • ...So far, 2 major cannabinoid-specific receptors, CNR1/CB1 (cannabinoid receptor 1 [brain]) and CNR2/CB2 (cannabinoid receptor 2 [macrophage]), have been cloned and characterized from mammalian tissues.(18,19) Cannabinoid administration curbs the growth of several genetic and xenograft models of cancer in rats and mice, and therefore these compounds are considered a novel family of potential anticancer agents....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
02 Sep 1993-Nature
TL;DR: The cloning of a receptor for cannabinoids is reported that is not expressed in the brain but rather in macrophages in the marginal zone of spleen, which helps clarify the non-psychoactive effects of cannabinoids.
Abstract: THE major active ingredient of marijuana, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabi-nol (Δ9-THC), has been used as a psychoactive agent for thousands of years. Marijuana, and Δ9-THC, also exert a wide range of other effects including analgesia, anti-inflammation, immunosuppression, anticonvulsion, alleviation of intraocular pressure in glaucoma, and attenuation of vomiting1. The clinical application of cannabinoids has, however, been limited by their psychoactive effects, and this has led to interest in the biochemical bases of their action. Progress stemmed initially from the synthesis of potent derivatives of δ9-THC4,5, and more recently from the cloning of a gene encoding a G-protein-coupled receptor for cannabinoids6. This receptor is expressed in the brain but not in the periphery, except for a low level in testes. It has been proposed that the non-psychoactive effects of cannabinoids are either mediated centrally or through direct interaction with other, non-receptor proteins1,7,8. Here we report the cloning of a receptor for cannabinoids that is not expressed in the brain but rather in macrophages in the marginal zone of spleen.

4,782 citations


"Dihydroceramide accumulation mediat..." refers background in this paper

  • ...So far, 2 major cannabinoid-specific receptors, CNR1/CB1 (cannabinoid receptor 1 [brain]) and CNR2/CB2 (cannabinoid receptor 2 [macrophage]), have been cloned and characterized from mammalian tissues.(18,19) Cannabinoid administration curbs the growth of several genetic and xenograft models of cancer in rats and mice, and therefore these compounds are considered a novel family of potential anticancer agents....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These guidelines are presented for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.

4,316 citations


"Dihydroceramide accumulation mediat..." refers background in this paper

  • ...S4C), 2 proteins located in these structures.(3,33) Taken together, these observations support the conclusion that THC, but not nutrient deprivation, enhances sphingolipid biosynthesis and inhibits the transport of sphingolipids from the ER to the Golgi....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current knowledge on the key genes composing the autophagy machinery in eukaryotes from yeast to mammalian cells and the signaling pathways that sense the status of different types of stress and induce autophagic for cell survival and homeostasis are presented.
Abstract: Autophagy is a process of self-degradation of cellular components in which double-membrane autophagosomes sequester organelles or portions of cytosol and fuse with lysosomes or vacuoles for breakdown by resident hydrolases. Autophagy is upregulated in response to extra- or intracellular stress and signals such as starvation, growth factor deprivation, ER stress, and pathogen infection. Defective autophagy plays a significant role in human pathologies, including cancer, neurodegeneration, and infectious diseases. We present our current knowledge on the key genes composing the autophagy machinery in eukaryotes from yeast to mammalian cells and the signaling pathways that sense the status of different types of stress and induce autophagy for cell survival and homeostasis. We also review the recent advances on the molecular mechanisms that regulate the autophagy machinery at various levels, from transcriptional activation to post-translational protein modification.

3,249 citations


"Dihydroceramide accumulation mediat..." refers background in this paper

  • ...Of note, ATG7 has been reported to modulate lysosomal photodamage, through a mechanism that is unrelated to autophagy.43 In our study we found that both ATG5- and ATG7-deficient cells were resistant to THC-induced LMP....

    [...]

Related Papers (5)