Disguised Faces in the Wild 2019
TL;DR: The outcome of the Disguised Faces in the Wild 2019 competition is summarized in terms of the dataset used for evaluation, a brief review of the algorithms employed by the participants for this task, and the results obtained.
Abstract: Disguised face recognition has wide-spread applicability in scenarios such as law enforcement, surveillance, and access control. Disguise accessories such as sunglasses, masks, scarves, or make-up modify or occlude different facial regions which makes face recognition a challenging task. In order to understand and benchmark the state-of-the-art on face recognition in the presence of disguise variations, the Disguised Faces in the Wild 2019 (DFW2019) competition has been organized. This paper summarizes the outcome of the competition in terms of the dataset used for evaluation, a brief review of the algorithms employed by the participants for this task, and the results obtained. The DFW2019 dataset has been released with four evaluation protocols and baseline results obtained from two deep learning-based state-of-the-art face recognition models. The DFW2019 dataset has also been analyzed with respect to degrees of difficulty: (i) easy, (ii) medium, and (iii) hard. The dataset has been released as part of the International Workshop on Disguised Faces in the Wild at International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019.
...read more
Citations
169 citations
29 citations
28 citations
Cites background or methods from "Disguised Faces in the Wild 2019"
...…the top performing teams in the competition demonstrated high verification performance at higher False Acceptance Rates (Deng and Zafeririou 2019; Singh et al. 2019a), analysis of the submissions demonstrate low performance (less than 10% True Acceptance Rate) at 0% False Acceptance Rate; a…...
[...]
...In 2018, the Disguised Faces in the Wild (DFW) dataset (Singh et al. 2019b) was released as part of the International Workshop on DFW held in conjunction with CVPR2018....
[...]
...Recently, the DFW2019 competition (Singh et al. 2019a) has also contained a protocol for recognizing images under plastic surgery variations, where deep learning based baseline algorithms show around 50% verification accuracy at 0.01% False Acceptance Rate....
[...]
...Recently, the DFW2019 competition (Singh et al. 2019a) has also contained a protocol for recognizing images under plastic surgery variations, where deep learning based baseline algorithms show around 50% verification accuracy at 0....
[...]
...While the top performing teams in the competition demonstrated high verification performance at higher False Acceptance Rates (Deng and Zafeririou 2019; Singh et al. 2019a), analysis of the submissions demonstrate low performance (less than 10% True Acceptance Rate) at 0% False Acceptance Rate; a metric often used in stricter settings such as access control in highly secure locations....
[...]
9 citations
Cites methods from "Disguised Faces in the Wild 2019"
...Method Impersonation Obfuscation Plastic Surgery Overall FAR 1e− 4 1e− 3 1e− 2 1e− 4 1e− 3 1e− 4 1e− 3 1e− 4 1e− 3 ResNet-50 [23] 38....
[...]
...On the Impersonation track, our solution is worse than the baseline method (LightCNN-29v2 [23]) provided by the organiser....
[...]
7 citations
References
93,356 citations
1,471 citations
1,425 citations
Additional excerpts
...ResNet-502 [7] (pre-trained on the large-scale VGG-Face2 [1] and MS-Celeb-1M [6] datasets) and LightCNN-29v23 [20] (pre-trained on the large-scale CASIA-WebFace [21] and MS-Celeb-1M [6] datasets) have been used for evaluation....
[...]
...ResNet-50(2) [7] (pre-trained on the large-scale VGG-Face2 [1] and MS-Celeb-1M [6] datasets) and LightCNN-29v2(3) [20] (pre-trained on the large-scale CASIA-WebFace [21] and MS-Celeb-1M [6] datasets) have been used for evaluation....
[...]
1,144 citations
1,122 citations