scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal Article

Distribution and forage use of exotic bumblebees in South Island, New Zealand

01 Jan 2004-New Zealand Journal of Ecology (New Zealand Ecological Society)-Vol. 28, Iss: 2, pp 225-232
TL;DR: Results provide support for the hypothesis that the loss of flower-rich meadows, particularly those containing populations of Fabaceae species with long corollae, is responsible for the decline of bumblebee species across Europe.
Abstract: The rapid decline in bumblebee populations within Europe has been linked to habitat loss through agricultural intensification, and a consequential reduction in the availability of preferred forage plants. The successful introduction of four European Bombus species to the South Island of New Zealand from England (in 1885 and 1906) provides an opportunity to determine how important different forage plants (also introduced from the U.K.) are to two severely threatened European bumblebee species (Bombus ruderatus and B. subterraneus). In January 2003 we conducted a survey of bumblebee populations across 70 sites in the central and southern South Island, recording which plant species were being used as pollen and nectar sources for each Bombus species. All four bumblebee species showed a clear preference for plants of European origin. Only B. terrestris, the most polylectic species, was recorded feeding on native plant species. The longer-tongued bumblebees, B. hortorum, B. ruderatus, and B. subterraneus, foraged predominantly on just two plant species; Trifolium pratense for both nectar and pollen, and Echium vulgare for nectar. These plant species are now declining in abundance in the U.K. Our results provide support for the hypothesis that the loss of flower-rich meadows, particularly those containing populations of Fabaceae species with long corollae, is responsible for the decline of bumblebee species across Europe. Comparison with earlier bumblebee surveys suggests that long-tongued bumblebees may also be in decline in New Zealand, particularly B. subterraneus which is now very localised and scarce.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The fact that the roadsides were demonstrably better habitats for pollinators and their food plants than field-facing margins underscores the widespread suggestion that roadside verges should be utilised more as a conservation tool to promote pollinator biodiversity.
Abstract: The global pollinator decline is commonly linked to modern intensive farming practices, partly because excessive herbicide and fertilizer use is thought to reduce pollinator food plant availability. This effect is particularly obvious across crop-/non-crop boundaries, but no study has compared pollinator and food plant abundance on adjacent crop- and roadside margins. We compared bumblebee abundance along 30 hedgerows in SW England; bordered either side by roads and arable fields (cultivated with wheat, barley, oilseed rape, or beans). Total bumblebee abundance along roadsides was over twice that observed on adjacent crop-facing margins, irrespective of crop type and this general pattern was apparent for three of the five most common bumblebee species, including generalist and specialist foragers. Both the total number of flowering plant species and the floral abundance of three of the five most visited plants was also higher on roadsides; minor variation between-crops was localised and unrelated to margin orientation. We conclude that organic farming may offer some advantages for pollinator conservation since it reduces field margin exposure to agro-chemical inputs. However, since conventional farming will remain central to global food production, modifications to current practices (such as the use of wildflower strips) are needed and may have ancillary benefits for pollinators by protecting arable margins from disturbance and agro-chemicals. In addition, the fact that the roadsides were demonstrably better habitats for pollinators and their food plants than field-facing margins underscores the widespread suggestion that roadside verges should be utilised more as a conservation tool to promote pollinator biodiversity.

40 citations


Cites background from "Distribution and forage use of exot..."

  • ...…a further eight have experienced major contractions in distribution and abundance (Goulson et al. 2005) and the UK situation is mirrored globally (Goulson and Hanley 2004; Williams Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10841-014-9744-3) contains…...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The honey bee was introduced primarily for honey production but has become the most important insect pollinator of seed, vegetable, fruit crops and pastures and the spread of the varroa mite has increased the cost of managing honey bee hives.
Abstract: Eight bee species have been deliberately released into New Zealand since the 1830's. The honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) was introduced primarily for honey production but has become the most important insect pollinator of seed, vegetable, fruit crops and pastures. The remaining species (Bombus terrestris (L.), B. hortorum (L.), B. ruderatus (F.), B. subterraneus (L.), Megachile rotundata (F.), Nomia melanderi (Cockerell), Osmia coerulescens (L.) were introduced to pollinate either red clover (Trifolium pratense) or lucerne (Medicago sativa). The honey bee has almost exclusively been relied upon for crop pollination although species of Bombus and M. rotundata are occasionally used commercially. The spread throughout New Zealand of the varroa mite (Varroa destructor Anderson & Trueman), a parasite that exclusively kills honey bees, has increased the cost of managing honey bee hives. The use of alternative bee species for crop pollination may reduce the potential impact of factors infl uencing the availability...

39 citations


Cites background from "Distribution and forage use of exot..."

  • ...Trifolium pratense and Echium vulgare have been noted as the predominant plant species visited by the long-tongued species (Goulson & Hanley 2004) along with Lupinus spp. for B. subterraneus (Donovan 2007)....

    [...]

  • ...Bombus subterraneus appears restricted to the central South Island (Macfarlane & Gurr 1995), particularly around lake margins (Goulson & Hanley 2004; Goulson et al. 2006) and the population may be declining (Howlett et al. 2009b)....

    [...]

  • ...Its willingness to forage on more plant species, and over a greater geographic range, allows a greater exploitation of habitat types compared with the longtongued species (Goulson & Hanley 2004)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A significant non-random plant association among non-Native bumble bee species and non-native plant species is found and it is likely that B. dahlbomii interacts with these non- native bees.
Abstract: SummaryIn the present work, we update floral associations and geographical distribution for four species of Bombus present in Chile, two native (B. dahlbomii and B. funebris) and two introduced species (B. terrestris and B. ruderatus). We also examine possible associations among native or introduced bees with native or introduced plant species. We found a significant non-random plant association among non-native bumble bee species and non-native plant species. Because of the distributional overlap between B. dahlbomii with the two non-native bee species, it is likely that B. dahlbomii interacts with these non-native bees.

37 citations


Cites background from "Distribution and forage use of exot..."

  • ...3) (Telleria, 1993; Morales and Aizen, 2002; Goulson, 2003; Goulson and Hanley, 2004)....

    [...]

  • ...…introduce Bombus may threaten populations of native pollinators by transporting diseases and competing with natives for food resources and nest sites (Free, 1993; Delaplane and Mayer, 2000; Stout and Goulson, 2002; Goulson and Hanley, 2004; Goulson, 2003; Goulson, 2004; Morales, 2007)....

    [...]

06 Jan 2007
TL;DR: The causes of introduction of bumblebees (Bombus), the factors favoring the invasion and the distribution of introduced species, and the studies about their ecological impact are reviewed, discussing the limitations of those studies and the main gaps in knowledge.
Abstract: Introduction of no native bumblebees (Bombus): causes, ecological consequences and perspectives: The invasion of non native pollinators might have considerable impacts on native pollinators, native and introduced plants. In this article I analyze the causes of introduction of bumblebees (Bombus), the factors favoring the invasion and the distribution of introduced species. I also review the studies about their ecological impact, discussing the limitations of those studies, and the main gaps in knowledge. Five bumblebee species are established outside their native ranges, as a consequence of intentional releases and the trade of colonies. Introduced bumblebees are highly polylecthic and could acquire high abundances in invaded areas, dominating in some cases the anthophyllous communities. In general, they gather resources more efficiently than natives, and despite a substantial overlap in the use of floral resources, in general both groups mutually exclude in time and space, suggesting the potential for competition; nevertheless no study has experimentally tested this hypothesis. The introduction of bumblebees could favor the introduction and transmission of pathogens. Non native bumblebees are less SecciUn especial

35 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Approximate Bayesian analyses suggest that the New Zealand population of B. subterraneus may have been founded by as few as two individuals, giving rise to low genetic diversity and marked genetic divergence from the (now extinct) UK population.
Abstract: Four British bumblebee species (Bombus terrestris, Bombus hortorum, Bombus ruderatus and Bombus subterraneus) became established in New Zealand following their introduction at the turn of the last century. Of these, two remain common in the United Kingdom (B. terrestris and B. hortorum), whilst two (B. ruderatus and B. subterraneus) have undergone marked declines, the latter being declared extinct in 2000. The presence of these bumblebees in New Zealand provides an unique system in which four related species have been isolated from their source population for over 100 years, providing a rare opportunity to examine the impacts of an initial bottleneck and introduction to a novel environment on their population genetics. We used microsatellite markers to compare modern populations of B. terrestris, B. hortorum and B. ruderatus in the United Kingdom and New Zealand and to compare museum specimens of British B. subterraneus with the current New Zealand population. We used approximate Bayesian computation to estimate demographic parameters of the introduction history, notably to estimate the number of founders involved in the initial introduction. Species-specific patterns derived from genetic analysis were consistent with the predictions based on the presumed history of these populations; demographic events have left a marked genetic signature on all four species. Approximate Bayesian analyses suggest that the New Zealand population of B. subterraneus may have been founded by as few as two individuals, giving rise to low genetic diversity and marked genetic divergence from the (now extinct) UK population.

34 citations


Cites background from "Distribution and forage use of exot..."

  • ...Indeed, the success of British bumblebees in New Zealand must have been greatly facilitated by the similar climate in many parts of New Zealand and the presence of an abundance of introduced bumblebee forage plant species (Hanley & Goulson 2003; Goulson & Hanley 2004; Lye et al. 2010)....

    [...]

  • ...4) and the subsequent existence of this species within relatively small populations (Goulson & Hanley 2004; Lye et al. 2010), it might have been predicted that genetic diversity would be low and that similarity to the original British population is likely to be limited, and this is indeed the case....

    [...]

References
More filters
Book
30 Sep 1988
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors define definitions of diversity and apply them to the problem of measuring species diversity, choosing an index and interpreting diversity measures, and applying them to structural and structural diversity.
Abstract: Definitions of diversity. Measuring species diversity. Choosing an index and interpreting diversity measures. Sampling problems. Structural diversity. Applications of diversity measures. Summary.

10,957 citations


"Distribution and forage use of exot..." refers background in this paper

  • ...This index is insensitive to sample size (Magurran, 1988), important because samples are inevitably larger for the more common species....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 1949-Nature
TL;DR: In this article, the authors define and examine a measure of concentration in terms of population constants, and examine the relationship between the characteristic and the index of diversity when both are applied to a logarithmic distribution.
Abstract: THE 'characteristic' defined by Yule1 and the 'index of diversity' defined by Fisher2 are two measures of the degree of concentration or diversity achieved when the individuals of a population are classified into groups. Both are defined as statistics to be calculated from sample data and not in terms of population constants. The index of diversity has so far been used chiefly with the logarithmic distribution. It cannot be used everywhere, as it does not always give values which are independent of sample size ; it cannot do so, for example, when applied to an infinite population of individuals classified into a finite number of groups. Williams3 has pointed out a relationship between the characteristic and the index of diversity when both are applied to a logarithmic distribution. The present purpose is to define and examine a measure of concentration in terms of population constants.

10,077 citations


"Distribution and forage use of exot..." refers methods in this paper

  • ...To compare the diet breadth of the species recorded, a Simpson’s index was calculated for the diversity of flowers visited (Simpson, 1949):...

    [...]

  • ...To compare the diet breadth of the species recorded, a Simpson’s index was calculated for the diversity of flowers visited (Simpson, 1949): where ni is the number of flowers of the ith species that were visited, N is the total number of flowers visited, and s is the total number of flower species…...

    [...]

Book
01 Jan 1988

1,150 citations


"Distribution and forage use of exot..." refers background in this paper

  • ...In addition to T. pratense and L. corniculatus, both of which are highly dependent on insects for pollination (Grime et al., 1988), we found substantial numbers of bumblebees visiting lupin (Lupinus arboreus and L. polyphyllus), thistles (Cirsium vulgare), and broom (Cytisus scoparius)....

    [...]

  • ...Although H. perforatum is believed to be increasing in abundance in the U.K., the other main forage plants we identified in New Zealand (E. vulgare, L. corniculatus and T. pratense) are all declining (Grime et al., 1988; Rich and Woodruff, 1996)....

    [...]

  • ...Each of these species is known to depend substantially or wholly on bee pollinators in order to reproduce (Grime et al., 1988; Stout, 2000; Stout et al., 2002)....

    [...]

  • ...corniculatus, both of which are highly dependent on insects for pollination (Grime et al., 1988), we found substantial numbers of bumblebees visiting lupin (Lupinus arboreus and L....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Negative impacts of exotic bees need to be carefully assessed before further introductions are carried out.
Abstract: Bees are generally regarded as beneficial insects for their role in pollination, and in the case of the honeybee Apis mellifera, for production of honey. As a result several bee species have been introduced to countries far beyond their home range, including A. mellifera, bumblebees (Bombus sp.), the alfalfa leafcutter bee Megachile rotundata, and various other solitary species. Possible negative consequences of these introductions include: competition with native pollinators for floral resources; competition for nest sites; co-introduction of natural enemies, particularly pathogens that may infect native organisms; pollination of exotic weeds; and disruption of pollination of native plants. For most exotic bee species little or nothing is known of these possible effects. Research to date has focused mainly on A. mellifera, and has largely been concerned with detecting competition with native flower visitors. Considerable circumstantial evidence has accrued that competition does occur, but no experiment has clearly demonstrated long-term reductions in populations of native organisms. Most researchers agree that this probably reflects the difficulty of carrying out convincing studies of competition between such mobile organisms, rather than a genuine absence of competitive effects. Effects on seed set of exotic weeds are easier to demonstrate. Exotic bees often exhibit marked preferences for visiting flowers of exotic plants. For example, in Australia and New Zealand many weeds from Europe are now visited by European honeybees and bumblebees. Introduced bees are primary pollinators of a number of serious weeds. Negative impacts of exotic bees need to be carefully assessed before further introductions are carried out.

648 citations


"Distribution and forage use of exot..." refers background or result in this paper

  • ...It seems likely that, in Europe at least, agricultural intensification is primarily responsible for the decline of many bumblebee species (Rasmont, 1988; Osborne and Corbet, 1994; Goulson, 2003a), although it is difficult to provide unequivocal evidence....

    [...]

  • ...of many bumblebee species (Rasmont, 1988; Osborne and Corbet, 1994; Goulson, 2003a), although it is difficult to provide unequivocal evidence....

    [...]

  • ...Our results lend further support to the claim that exotic (bumble- and honey-) bees are important pollinators of various weeds (Sugden et al., 1996; Stout et al., 2002; Goulson, 2003b; Hanley and Goulson, 2003)....

    [...]

  • ...Both B. terrestris and B. hortorum, by contrast, remain common throughout most of Northwestern Europe (Goulson, 2003a)....

    [...]

Book
01 Jan 2003
TL;DR: This book discusses social organisation and conflict in bumblebee communities, foraging economics, and the effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems.
Abstract: 1. Introduction 2. Thermoregulation 3. Social organisation and conflict 4. Finding a mate 5. Natural enemies 6. Foraging Economics 7. Foraging range 8. Exploitation of patchy resources 9. Choice of flower species 10. Intraspecific floral choices 11. Communication during foraging 12. Competition in bumblebee communities 13. Bumblebees as pollinators 14. Conservation 15. Bumblebees abroad effects of introduced bees on native ecosystems

360 citations


"Distribution and forage use of exot..." refers background or result in this paper

  • ...It seems likely that, in Europe at least, agricultural intensification is primarily responsible for the decline of many bumblebee species (Rasmont, 1988; Osborne and Corbet, 1994; Goulson, 2003a), although it is difficult to provide unequivocal evidence....

    [...]

  • ...Our results lend further support to the claim that exotic (bumble- and honey-) bees are important pollinators of various weeds (Sugden et al., 1996; Stout et al., 2002; Goulson, 2003b; Hanley and Goulson, 2003)....

    [...]

  • ...Both B. terrestris and B. hortorum, by contrast, remain common throughout most of Northwestern Europe (Goulson, 2003a)....

    [...]