Do illness rating systems predict discharge location, length of stay, and cost after total hip arthroplasty?
TL;DR: It is suggested that although ASA classifications predict discharge location and SOI scores predict length of stay and total costs, other factors beyond illness rating systems remain stronger predictors of discharge for THA patients.
Abstract: Background As procedure rates and expenditures for total hip arthroplasty (THA) rise, hospitals are developing models to predict discharge location, a major determinant of total cost. The predictive value of existing illness rating systems such as the American Society for Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Classification System, Severity of Illness (SOI) scoring system, or Mallampati (MP) rating scale on discharge location remains unclear. This study explored the predictive role of ASA, SOI, and MP scores on discharge location, lengths of stay, and total costs for THA patients. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective primary or revision THA was conducted at a single institution. Multivariable regressions were utilized to assess the significant predictive factors for lengths of stay, total costs, and discharge to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), rehabilitation centers, and home. Controls included demographic factors, insurance coverage, and the type of procedure. Results ASA scores ≥3 are the only significant predictors of discharge to SNFs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.69, confidence interval [CI] = 1.04-2.74) and home (OR = 0.57, CI = 0.34-0.98). Medicaid coverage (OR = 2.61, CI = 1.37-4.96) and African-American race (OR = 2.60, CI = 1.59-4.25) were additional significant predictors of discharge to SNF. SOI scores are the only significant predictors of length of stay (β = 1.36 days, CI = 0.53-2.19) and total cost for an episode (β = $6,234, CI = $3577-$8891). MP scores possess limited predictive power over lengths of stay only. Conclusions These findings suggest that although ASA classifications predict discharge location and SOI scores predict length of stay and total costs, other factors beyond illness rating systems remain stronger predictors of discharge for THA patients.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: Medic Medicaid patients represent a higher risk cohort with increased resource utilization perioperatively, including longer LOS, and more 90-day ED visits and readmissions, according to this study.
Abstract: Background With increased restraints and efforts to contain costs in total hip arthroplasty (THA), an emphasis has been placed on risk stratification. The purpose of this study was to determine whether Medicaid patients have increased resource utilization (including 90-day emergency department [ED] visits and readmissions) compared to Medicare or commercial insurance carriers. The study hypothesized that the Medicaid population would represent a high-risk cohort with increased resource utilization. Methods The institutional database was retrospectively queried for primary THAs from 2013 to 2017 based on Current Procedural Terminology codes and patients undergoing revision surgery were excluded. Demographic information including age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) and medical comorbidities including American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores were evaluated. Patients were stratified by insurance type and length of stay (LOS), and 90-day ED visits and 90-day readmissions were assessed in univariable and multivariable analysis. Results A total of 3674 primary THA patients were included in the analysis (including 116 with Medicaid, 1713 with Medicare, and 1845 with other insurance providers). Medicaid patients had significantly higher ASA scores (P Conclusion Medicaid patients represent a higher risk cohort with increased resource utilization perioperatively, including longer LOS, and more 90-day ED visits and readmissions. This should be considered in outcome assessments and alternative expectations for the episode of care should be set for this population.
26 citations
TL;DR: Efforts to control narcotic use and initiatives aimed to reduce early postoperative hypotension could aid in reducing LOS, and attempts should be made to correct postoperative anemia, high glucose levels, and a high creatinine level when possible.
Abstract: Background Many studies have examined strategies to reduce length of stay (LOS) after total hip arthroplasty (THA), but few have focused on modifiable patient-specific information in the acute postoperative period. This study investigates the determinants of LOS after THA, with a focus on potentially modifiable factors. Methods A total of 1278 patients undergoing elective THA from 2012 to 2014 were extracted from our institutional data warehouse at our academic orthopedic specialty hospital. Data were collected on patient demographics, comorbidities, inpatient opioid use, hypotensive events, and abnormalities in laboratory values, all occurring on postoperative day 0 or 1. The main outcome was hospital LOS. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for LOS over 3 days. Results The average age of patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty in our cohort was 62.3 (standard deviation 10.7) years, and 52.7% were women. Eighty-one (6.3%) of 1278 patients had a LOS more than 3 days. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated several statistically significant nonmodifiable and modifiable risk factors that influence LOS after THA. Nonmodifiable risk factors included nonwhite race (odds ratio [OR], 1.497), single marital status (OR, 1.724), increasing age (OR, 1.330), and increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR, 1.411). Potentially modifiable risk factors included every 10 mg oral morphine equivalent consumption (1.069), every 5 postoperative hypotensive events (OR, 1.232), low hemoglobin (OR, 3.265), high glucose levels (OR, 1.887), and a high creatinine (OR, 2.874). Conclusion This study identifies potentially modifiable factors that are associated with increased LOS after THA, including postoperative opioid use and hypotensive events. Efforts to control narcotic use and initiatives aimed to reduce early postoperative hypotension could aid in reducing LOS. Furthermore, attempts should be made to correct postoperative anemia, high glucose levels, and a high creatinine level when possible.
23 citations
20 Sep 2019
TL;DR: In this article, an accelerated recovery total joint arthroplasty (TJA) protocol for all TJA patients was implemented at a county hospital in South Carolina, which consisted of standardized, preoperative medical and psychosocial optimization, perioperative spinal anesthesia, tranexamic acid and local infiltration analgesia use, postoperative emphasis on non-narcotic analgesia, and early mobilization.
Abstract: Outpatient and accelerated recovery total joint arthroplasty (TJA) programs have become standard for private and academic practices. County hospitals traditionally serve patients with limited access to TJA and psychosocial factors which create challenges for accelerated recovery. The effectiveness of such programs at a county hospital has not been reported. Methods In 2017, our county hospital implemented an accelerated recovery protocol for all TJA patients. This protocol consisted of standardized, preoperative medical and psychosocial optimization, perioperative spinal anesthesia, tranexamic acid and local infiltration analgesia use, postoperative emphasis on non-narcotic analgesia, and early mobilization. LOS, complications, disposition, and cost were compared between patients treated before and after protocol implementation. Results In 15 months, 108 primary TJA patients were treated. Compared with the previous 108 TJA patients, LOS dropped from 3.4 to 1.6 days (P < 0.001), more patients discharged home (92% versus 72%, P < 0.001), average hospitalization and procedure-specific costs decreased 24.7% and 22.1%, respectively, and were significantly fewer complications (7% versus 21%, P = 0.007). Conclusions Implementation of an accelerated recovery TJA program at a County Hospital is novel. This implementation requires careful patient selection and a coordinated multidisciplinary approach and is a safe and cost-effective method of delivering high-quality care to an underserved cohort.
12 citations
TL;DR: For patients undergoing primary THA, increased age, female gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, congestive heart failure, and multiple comorbidities are risk factors for inpatient hospital LOS of 2 or more days.
Abstract: Background The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has removed total hip arthroplasty from the inpatient-only (IO) list in January 2020. Given the confusion created when total knee arthroplasty came off the IO list in 2018, this study aims to develop a predictive model for guiding preoperative inpatient admission decisions based upon readily available patient demographic and comorbidity data. Methods This is a retrospective review of 1415 patients undergoing elective unilateral primary THA between January 2018 and October 2019. Multiple logistic regression was used to develop a model for predicting LOS ≥2 days based on preoperative demographics and comorbidities. Results Controlling for other demographics and comorbidities, increased age (odds ratio [OR], 1.048; P Conclusion For patients undergoing primary THA, increased age, female gender, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, congestive heart failure, and multiple comorbidities are risk factors for inpatient hospital LOS of 2 or more days. Our predictive model based on readily available patient presentation and comorbidity characteristics may aid surgeons in preoperatively identifying patients requiring inpatient admission with removal of THA from the Medicare IO list.
10 citations
TL;DR: Quality improvement efforts through partnership with selective SNFs can significantly decrease PAC costs for patients undergoing primary THA and TKA.
Abstract: Background With the increasing popularity of alternative payment models following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), efforts have focused on reducing post-acute care (PAC) costs, particularly patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The purpose of this study is to determine if preferentially discharging patients to high-quality SNFs can reduce bundled payment costs for primary THA and TKA. Methods At our institution, a quality improvement initiative for SNFs was implemented at the start of 2017, preferentially discharging patients to internally credentialed facilities, designated by several quality measures. Claims data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were queried to identify patients discharged to SNF following primary total joint arthroplasty. We compared costs and outcomes between patients discharged to credentialed SNF sites and those discharged to other sites. Results Between 2015 and 2018, of a consecutive series of 8778 primary THA and TKA patients, 1284 (14.6%) were discharged to an SNF. Following initiation of the program, 498 patients were discharged to an SNF, 301 (60.4%) of which were sent to a credentialed facility. Patients at credentialed facilities had significantly lower SNF costs ($11,184 vs $8198, P Conclusion Quality improvement efforts through partnership with selective SNFs can significantly decrease PAC costs for patients undergoing primary THA and TKA.
4 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: These large projected increases in demand for total hip and knee arthroplasties provide a quantitative basis for future policy decisions related to the numbers of orthopaedic surgeons needed to perform these procedures and the deployment of appropriate resources to serve this need.
Abstract: Background: Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of revision total hip and knee arthroplasties performed in the United States. The purpose of this study was to formulate projections for the number of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties that will be performed in the United States through 2030.
Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1990 to 2003) was used in conjunction with United States Census Bureau data to quantify primary and revision arthroplasty rates as a function of age, gender, race and/or ethnicity, and census region. Projections were performed with use of Poisson regression on historical procedure rates in combination with population projections from 2005 to 2030.
Results: By 2030, the demand for primary total hip arthroplasties is estimated to grow by 174% to 572,000. The demand for primary total knee arthroplasties is projected to grow by 673% to 3.48 million procedures. The demand for hip revision procedures is projected to double by the year 2026, while the demand for knee revisions is expected to double by 2015. Although hip revisions are currently more frequently performed than knee revisions, the demand for knee revisions is expected to surpass the demand for hip revisions after 2007. Overall, total hip and total knee revisions are projected to grow by 137% and 601%, respectively, between 2005 and 2030.
Conclusions: These large projected increases in demand for total hip and knee arthroplasties provide a quantitative basis for future policy decisions related to the numbers of orthopaedic surgeons needed to perform these procedures and the deployment of appropriate resources to serve this need.
7,032 citations
TL;DR: Episode-of-care payments for TJAs vary widely depending on the type of procedure, patient comorbidities and complications, discharge disposition, and readmission rates.
Abstract: Background
Understanding the type and magnitude of services that patients receive postdischarge and the financial impact of readmissions is crucial to assessing the feasibility of accepting bundled payments.
373 citations
TL;DR: Preoperative femoral and ace-tabular bone loss and a diagnosis of periprosthetic fracture were predictive of higher resource utilization associated with revision procedures and appropriate reimbursement formulas should be developed to accurately reflect the true costs of caring for patients with a failed total hip arthroplasty.
Abstract: Background: Previous reports have suggested that hospital resource utilization for revision total hip arthroplasty is substantially higher than that for primary total hip arthroplasty. However, current United States Medicare hospital-reimbursement policy does not distinguish between the two procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare primary and revision total hip arthroplasties with regard to actual hospital resource utilization and to identify clinical and demographic factors that are predictive of higher resource utilization associated with these procedures.
Methods: We evaluated the clinical, demographic, and economic data associated with 491 consecutive unilateral primary or revision total hip arthroplasties performed by two surgeons at a single institution between January 2000 and December 2002. The distributions of various demographic, clinical, and utilization characteristics were compared between the two types of arthroplasty procedures, and multivariable linear regression techniques were used to determine independent patient characteristics that were predictive of higher costs for both the primary and the revision procedures.
Results: The mean total hospital cost was $31,341 for the revision procedures compared with $24,170 for the primary procedures (p < 0.0001). The mean operative time was 41% longer for the revisions than for the primary procedures (4.5 hours compared with 3.2 hours, p < 0.0001), the mean estimated blood loss was 160% higher (1348 mL compared with 518 mL, p < 0.0001), the mean complication rate was 32% higher (29% compared with 22%, p = 0.072), and the mean length of the hospital stay was 16% longer (6.5 days compared with 5.6 days, p = 0.0005). A higher severity-of-illness score (a measure of preoperative medical health) was predictive of higher resource utilization for both primary and revision arthroplasty even after adjustment for other factors. Preoperative femoral and ace-tabular bone loss and a diagnosis of periprosthetic fracture were predictive of higher resource utilization associated with revision procedures.
Conclusions: At one institution, hospital resource utilization for revision total hip arthroplasty was found to be significantly higher than that for primary arthroplasty. This information is not reflected by current United States Medicare hospital reimbursement, which is the same for all lower-extremity arthroplasty procedures, regardless of the diagnosis, the complexity of the procedure, or the patient's baseline medical health. If these findings are generalizable to other institutions, appropriate reimbursement formulas should be developed to accurately reflect the true costs of caring for patients with a failed total hip arthroplasty.
Level of Evidence: Economic and decision analysis, Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
300 citations
TL;DR: An easily administered tool to preoperatively predict patient discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty in the United States is developed, named the Predicting Location after Arthro Plasty Nomogram.
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to develop an easily administered tool to preoperatively predict patient discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty in the United States. Data were collected in a retrospective review of 517 medical charts and analyzed using logistic regression to develop a model for predicting the likelihood that a patient will not be discharged directly home. The resulting regression model was the basis for the nomogram, named the Predicting Location after Arthroplasty Nomogram. This model demonstrated a bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.867, excellent calibration, and external validation as demonstrated by a concordance index of 0.861. Preoperative knowledge that a patient is likely to require an extended care facility allows the clinical care team to make appropriate arrangements and avoid potential delays in patient discharge.
142 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify baseline patient characteristics that are predictive of discharge to an inpatient extended care facility (ECF) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA).
Abstract: Increased emphasis has been placed on hospital length of stay and discharge planning after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The purpose of this study was to identify baseline patient characteristics that are predictive of discharge to an inpatient extended care facility (ECF) after TJA. Clinical, demographic, and resource utilization data were analyzed for 7818 consecutive patients who underwent primary or revision TJA at 1 of 3 high-volume TJA centers. A stepwise linear regression model was used to identify predictors of discharge to an ECF. Overall, 29% of patients were discharged to an ECF after TJA. Older age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, Medicare insurance, and female sex were all associated with a higher likelihood of discharge to an ECF. Significant differences in practice patterns were found across hospitals with respect to discharge disposition after TJA. Further study is necessary to determine the appropriate criteria for discharge to an ECF after TJA.
122 citations