scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Docking-based 3D-QSAR Studies of Phosphodiesterase 9A Inhibitors

31 Aug 2017-Letters in Drug Design & Discovery-Vol. 14, Iss: 9, pp 986-998

AboutThis article is published in Letters in Drug Design & Discovery.The article was published on 2017-08-31. It has received 1 citation(s) till now. The article focuses on the topic(s): Docking (molecular).

...read more


Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Analysis of the receptor-based CoMFA and CoMSIA-SE contour maps provided much helpful information to improve the bioactivities of aryl-chromeno-pyrrol analogs as PDE5 inhibitors.
Abstract: Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors can be used as clinical agents for the treatment of erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension. A series of aryl-chromeno-pyrrol derivatives were previously identified as PDE5 inhibitors in our lab. Herein, these molecules were subjected to 3D-QSAR analysis with CoMFA and CoMSIA methods to gain deeper insight into the structural requirements for their bioactivities. Receptor- and ligand-based alignment were used and compared to find the alignment-related factors that affect the accuracy of QSAR models. The receptor-based CoMFA and CoMSIA models, which were generated by superimposing the docking conformations directly in the protein binding site, gave more significant results for 38 training set compounds and 5 test set molecules. Comparison of the two alignments revealed that spatial arrangement of the ligands is the principal factor in determining the reliability of the 3D-QSAR models. Detailed analysis of the receptor-based CoMSIA-SE contour maps provided much helpful information to improve the bioactivities of aryl-chromeno-pyrrol analogs as PDE5 inhibitors.

1 citations


Cites methods from "Docking-based 3D-QSAR Studies of Ph..."

  • ...By introducing receptor information during the alignment process, the so called receptor-based 3D-QSAR analysis, which uses the receptor bound ligands for model generation, has been proved to be more reliable (Zheng et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2017)....

    [...]

  • ...In an earlier work, a remarkably higher cross-validated q2 and the conventional r2 values were obtained from a training set of 123 PDE9 agents using RBA method, compared with LBA method (Tan et al., 2017)....

    [...]

  • ...Apparently, only RBA produced a significant CoMFA model, according to the usual criterion of reliability in QSAR studies (q2 ≥ 0.5 and r2 ≥ 0.9) (Fang et al., 2011; Golbraikh and Tropsha 2002; Tan et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2017)....

    [...]