Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve the information environment
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined the effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on firms' information environment and found that the improvement in the information environment is driven both by information and comparability effects.
Abstract: More than 120 countries require or permit the use of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by publicly listed companies on the basis of higher information quality and accounting comparability from IFRS application. However, the empirical evidence about these presumed benefits is often conflicting and fails to distinguish between information quality and comparability. In this paper we examine the effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on firms’ information environment. We find that after mandatory IFRS adoption consensus forecast errors decrease for firms that mandatorily adopt IFRS relative to forecast errors of other firms. We also find decreasing forecast errors for voluntary adopters, but this effect is smaller and not robust. Moreover, we show that the magnitude of the forecast error decrease is associated with the firm-specific differences between local GAAP and IFRS. This finding suggests that it is IFRS adoption rather than a correlated unobservable factor that is causing forecast errors to decrease. Exploiting individual analyst level data and isolating settings where analysts would benefit more from either increased comparability or higher quality information, we document that the improvement in the information environment is driven both by information and comparability effects. These results suggest that mandatory IFRS adoption has improved the quality of information intermediation in capital markets, and as a result firms’ information environment, by increasing both information quality and accounting comparability.
Figures (10)
TABLE 8 Panel A: Summary statistics by firm classification for analyst portfolios that change from Multiple GAAP to IFRS 
TABLE 7 Panel A: Summary statistics by analyst classification 
TABLE 2 Panel A: Summary statistics for variables used in regression analysis 
TABLE 9 Panel B: Effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on the probability of meeting or beating analyst forecasts. 
TABLE 4 Effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on information environment – Varying the dependent variable 
TABLE 6 Effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on information environment –Firm-specific differences between IFRS and local GAAP 
TABLE 9 Panel B: Effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on the probability of meeting or beating analyst forecasts. 
TABLE 5 Effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on information environment – Varying the forecast horizon 
TABLE 3 Effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on information environment – Varying the sample 
TABLE 1 Sample composition by country and by accounting standard followed
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: The authors discusses the empirical literature on the economic consequences of disclosure and financial reporting regulation, drawing on U.S. and international evidence, highlighting the challenges with quantifying regulatory costs and benefits, measuring disclosure and reporting outcomes, and drawing causal inferences from regulatory studies.
Abstract: This paper discusses the empirical literature on the economic consequences of disclosure and financial reporting regulation, drawing on U.S. and international evidence. Given the policy relevance of research on regulation, we highlight the challenges with (1) quantifying regulatory costs and benefits, (2) measuring disclosure and reporting outcomes, and (3) drawing causal inferences from regulatory studies. Next, we discuss empirical studies that link disclosure and reporting activities to firm-specific and market-wide economic outcomes. Understanding these links is important when evaluating regulation. We then synthesize the empirical evidence on the economic effects of disclosure regulation and reporting standards, including the evidence on International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption. Several important conclusions emerge. We generally lack evidence on market-wide effects and externalities from regulation, yet such evidence is central to the economic justification of regulation. Moreover, evidence on causal effects of disclosure and reporting regulation is still relatively rare. We also lack evidence on the real effects of such regulation. These limitations provide many research opportunities. We conclude with several specific suggestions for future research.
779 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the impact of reporting under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on the capital market and found that, across all countries, mandatory IFRS reporting had little impact on liquidity.
470 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide evidence on the preliminary effects of mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on accounting quality for a relatively broad set of firms from 20 countries that adopted IFRS in 2005 relative to a benchmark group of firms that did not adopt IFRS.
Abstract: We provide evidence on the preliminary effects of mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) on accounting quality for a relatively broad set of firms from 20 countries that adopted IFRS in 2005 relative to a benchmark group of firms from countries that did not adopt IFRS matched on the strength of legal enforcement, industry, size, book-to-market, and accounting performance. Relative to these benchmark firms, we find that IFRS firms exhibit significant increases in income smoothing and aggressive reporting of accruals, and a significant decrease in timeliness of loss recognition; however we do not find significant differences across IFRS and benchmark firms in meeting or beating earnings targets. Our findings contrast with findings in earlier studies which suggest that IFRS adoption leads to increased accounting quality. Our findings primarily hold for firms in strong enforcement countries, which suggests that enforcement mechanisms in these countries were not able to counter the initial effects of greater flexibility in IFRS relative to domestic GAAP.
455 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the economic consequences of mandatory International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption in the European Union (EU), and provide suggestions on how future research can add to our understanding of these effects.
Abstract: This paper discusses empirical evidence on the economic consequences of mandatory International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption in the European Union (EU), and provides suggestions on how future research can add to our understanding of these effects. Based on the stated objectives of the EU's so-called ‘IAS Regulation’, we distinguish between intended and unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption. Empirical research on the intended consequences generally fails to document an increase in the comparability or transparency of financial statements. In contrast, there is rich and almost unanimous evidence of positive effects on capital markets and at the macroeconomic level. We argue that certain research design issues are likely to contribute to this apparent mismatch in findings. The literature investigating unintended consequences of mandatory IFRS adoption is still in its infancy. However, extant empirical evidence and insights from non-IFRS settings suggest that mandatory IFRS adopt...
308 citations
TL;DR: The authors reviewed the literature on the effects of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption and provided a cohesive picture of empirical archival literature on how IFRS adoption affects: financial reporting quality, capital markets, corporate decision making, stewardship and governance, debt contracting, and auditing.
Abstract: This paper reviews the literature on the effects of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) adoption. It aims to provide a cohesive picture of empirical archival literature on how IFRS adoption affects: financial reporting quality, capital markets, corporate decision making, stewardship and governance, debt contracting, and auditing. In addition, we also present discussion of studies that focus on specific attributes of IFRS, and also provide detailed discussion of research design choices and empirical issues researchers face when evaluating IFRS adoption effects. We broadly summarize the development of the IFRS literature as follows: The majority of early studies paint IFRS as bringing significant benefits to adopting firms and countries in terms of (i) improved transparency, (ii) lower costs of capital, (iii) improved cross-country investments, (iv) better comparability of financial reports, and (v) increased following by foreign analysts. However, these documented benefits tended to vary significantly across firms and countries. More recent studies now attribute at least some of the earlier documented benefits to factors other than adoption of new accounting standards per se, such as enforcement changes. Other recent studies examining the effects of IFRS on the inclusion of accounting numbers in formal contracts point out that IFRS has lowered the contractibility of accounting numbers. Finally, we observe substantial variation in empirical designs across papers which makes it difficult to reconcile differences in their conclusions.
258 citations
References
More filters
TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that many of the CAPM average-return anomalies are related, and they are captured by the three-factor model in Fama and French (FF 1993).
Abstract: Previous work shows that average returns on common stocks are related to firm characteristics like size, earnings/price, cash flow/price, book-to-market equity, past sales growth, long-term past return, and short-term past return. Because these patterns in average returns apparently are not explained by the CAPM, they are called anomalies. We find that, except for the continuation of short-term returns, the anomalies largely disappear in a three-factor model. Our results are consistent with rational ICAPM or APT asset pricing, but we also consider irrational pricing and data problems as possible explanations. RESEARCHERS HAVE IDENTIFIED MANY patterns in average stock returns. For example, DeBondt and Thaler (1985) find a reversal in long-term returns; stocks with low long-term past returns tend to have higher future returns. In contrast, Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) find that short-term returns tend to continue; stocks with higher returns in the previous twelve months tend to have higher future returns. Others show that a firm's average stock return is related to its size (ME, stock price times number of shares), book-to-marketequity (BE/ME, the ratio of the book value of common equity to its market value), earnings/price (E/P), cash flow/price (C/P), and past sales growth. (Banz (1981), Basu (1983), Rosenberg, Reid, and Lanstein (1985), and Lakonishok, Shleifer and Vishny (1994).) Because these patterns in average stock returns are not explained by the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) of Sharpe (1964) and Lintner (1965), they are typically called anomalies. This paper argues that many of the CAPM average-return anomalies are related, and they are captured by the three-factor model in Fama and French (FF 1993). The model says that the expected return on a portfolio in excess of the risk-free rate [E(Ri) - Rf] is explained by the sensitivity of its return to three factors: (i) the excess return on a broad market portfolio (RM - Rf); (ii) the difference between the return on a portfolio of small stocks and the return on a portfolio of large stocks (SMB, small minus big); and (iii) the difference between the return on a portfolio of high-book-to-market stocks and the return on a portfolio of low-book-to-market stocks (HML, high minus low). Specifically, the expected excess return on portfolio i is,
6,737 citations
Journal Article•
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the relationship between disclosure level and the cost of equity capital by regressing firm-specific estimates of cost of capital on market beta, firm size and a self-constructed measure of disclosure level.
Abstract: The effect of disclosure level on the cost of equity capital is a matter of considerable interest and importance to the financial reporting community However, the association between disclosure level and cost of equity capital is not well established and has been difficult to quantify In this paper I examine the association between disclosure level and the cost of equity capital by regressing firm-specific estimates of cost of equity capital on market beta, firm size and a self-constructed measure of disclosure level My measure of disclosure level is based on the amount of voluntary disclosure provided in the 1990 annual reports of a sample of 122 manufacturing firms For firms that attract a low analyst following, the results indicate that greater disclosure is associated with a lower cost of equity capital The magnitude of the effect is such that a one-unit difference in the disclosure measure is associated with a difference of approximately twenty-eight basis points in the cost of equity capital, after controlling for market beta and firm size For firms with a high analyst following, however, I find no evidence of an association between my measure of disclosure level and cost of equity capital perhaps because the disclosure measure is limited to the annual report and accordingly may not provide a powerful proxy for overall disclosure level when analysts play a significant role in the communication process
3,621 citations
Book•
25 Aug 2011TL;DR: The authors analyzed the format of typical bonus contracts, providing a more complete characterization of their accounting incentive effects than earlier studies, and found that accrual policies of managers are related to income-reporting incentives of their bonus contracts.
Abstract: Studies examining managerial accounting decisions postulate that executives rewarded by earnings-based bonuses select accounting procedures that increase their compensation. The empirical results of these studies are conflicting. This paper analyzes the format of typical bonus contracts, providing a more complete characterization of their accounting incentive effects than earlier studies. The test results suggest that (1) accrual policies of managers are related to income-reporting incentives of their bonus contracts, and (2) changes in accounting procedures by managers are associated with adoption or modification of their bonus plan.
3,616 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors study German firms that have switched from the German to an international reporting regime (1AS or U.S. GAAP) and show that proxies for the information asymmetry component of the cost of capital for the switching firms, namely, the bid-ask spread and trading volume behave in the predicted direction compared to firms employing the German reporting regime.
Abstract: Economic theory suggests that a commitment by a firm to increased levels of disclosure should lower the information asymmetry component of the firm's cost of capital. But while the theory is compelling, so far empirical results relating increased levels of disclosure to measurable economic benefits have been mixed. One explanation for the mixed results among studies using data from firms publicly registered in the United States is that, under current U.S. reporting standards, the disclosure environment is already rich. In this paper, we study German firms that have switched from the German to an international reporting regime (1AS or U.S. GAAP), thereby committing themselves to increased levels of disclosure. We show that proxies for the information asymmetry component of the cost of capital for the switching firmsnamely, the bid-ask spread and trading volume-behave in the predicted direction compared to firms employing the German reporting regime.
2,984 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors characterize the ''shareholder'' and ''stakeholder'' corporate governance models of common and code law countries respectively as resolving information asymmetry by public disclosure and private communication.
2,554 citations