Dynamic Response of Laterally Loaded Pile Groups in Clay
Citations
24 citations
Cites methods from "Dynamic Response of Laterally Loade..."
...2 essentially consists of three parts: a test tank with dimensions 2.0 × 2.0 × 1.5 m, a wave absorbing Table 1 Scaling factors for dynamic laterally loaded piles Quantity 1 g (Laboratory) Prototype Prototype values Length 1/n n 16.5 Acceleration 1 1 1 Stiffness 1/nα nα 16.5 Stress 1/n n 16.5 Force 1/n3 n3 4492.125 Strain 1/n1-α n1-α 1 Displacement 1/n2-α n2-α 16.5 Pore fluid density 1 1 1 Permeability 1 1 1 Time (dynamic) 1/n1-α/2 n1-α/2 4.062 Velocity 1/n1-α/2 n1-α/2 4.062 Frequency n1-α/2 1/n1-α/2 0.246 Shear wave velocity 1/nα/2 nα/2 4.062 International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 2016 VOL. 10 NO. 4 319 medium of saw dust (Gazetas and Stokoe 1991), and a boundary element made of mild steel basket in logarithmic spiral arc shape covered with geomembrane sheet, similar to the one reported in Boominathan and Ayothiraman (2005), and Chandrasekaran et al. (2012)....
[...]
...…Engineering 2016 VOL. 10 NO. 4 319 medium of saw dust (Gazetas and Stokoe 1991), and a boundary element made of mild steel basket in logarithmic spiral arc shape covered with geomembrane sheet, similar to the one reported in Boominathan and Ayothiraman (2005), and Chandrasekaran et al. (2012)....
[...]
...Boominathan and Ayothiraman (2005) showed that the response curve for the pile embedded in rigid tank is scattered and shows multiple peaks due to the reflection of long-period waves, but the same for the pile embedded in EHSS facility shows a single peak simulating half-space conditions as in the case of field....
[...]
...The clay bed is prepared similar to Boominathan and Ayothiraman (2005, 2007)....
[...]
24 citations
13 citations
Cites background from "Dynamic Response of Laterally Loade..."
...Most of the landslides in Nilgiris occurred during monsoon seasons and are predominantly rainfall-induced (NDMG 2009; Jaiswal et al. 2011; Chandrasekaran et al. 2013b; Ganapathy and Rajawat 2015)....
[...]
...Several researchers emphasized the importance of evaluation of proper seismic input in the analysis of shallow (e.g., Gazetas and Mylonakis 2005) and pile foundations (e.g., Finn et al. 1997; Chandrasekaran et al. 2013a)....
[...]
...Nilgiris district, located in the state of Tamilnadu, in PI is affected by numerous landslides historically (Bhandari 2006; NDMG 2009; Chandrasekaran et al. 2013b)....
[...]
10 citations
6 citations
References
44 citations
"Dynamic Response of Laterally Loade..." refers background or result in this paper
...These regions are characterized predominantly by soft marine clays with a thickness varying from 5–20 m, hence pile foundations are commonly employed to support these structures [Boominathan and Ayothiraman, 2007]....
[...]
...The efficacy of the EHSS was verified to dampen stress waves significantly and frequency responses are not interfered by the reflected stress waves which was a common problem in the studies conducted in rigid tanks [Boominathan and Ayothiraman, 2007]....
[...]
40 citations
38 citations
"Dynamic Response of Laterally Loade..." refers background in this paper
...Plotting of measured responses of pile group with steady state frequency is common for sinusoidal loading and reported in literature (e.g., Hassini and Woods 1989; El-Marsafawi et al.,1992; Han and Vaziri, 1992; Burr et al., 1997)....
[...]
...Scale effects are generally considered greater for non cohesive soils rather than cohesive soils used in the present study [Burr et al., 1997]....
[...]
30 citations
"Dynamic Response of Laterally Loade..." refers background in this paper
...The response curve for the pile embedded in the rigid tank is scattered and show multiple peaks due to the reflection of long-period waves [Boominathan and Ayothiraman, 2005]....
[...]
27 citations
"Dynamic Response of Laterally Loade..." refers background in this paper
...It is generally accepted that minimum dimension of embedded structure (diameter of pile in the present study 25 mm) of 20–30 times more than the mean particle size of soil (less than 75 micron in the present study) is sufficient to avoid scaling effects [Ovesen, 1979; Randolph and House, 2001]....
[...]