scispace - formally typeset
Book ChapterDOI

Effect of Rate of Change of Stimulus

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
It has been shown that the assumption of a fixed Weber fraction for a user is not correct and it is a monotonic function of the temporal variation of the stimulus.
Abstract
In the literature, it has been assumed that the Weber fraction is always fixed for an individual and is independent of any temporal variation in the stimulus. If the assumption is not correct, the perceptual limitations of a human being are not fully exploited by the fixed Weber fraction. For example, if the signal changes very slowly, it is difficult for a user to react to the change, and when the change is too quick, the user may not be able to respond because of nonzero human response time (minimum time required for reacting to a change). Thus, a fixed Weber fraction will contribute inessential data packets for such kind of signals. This leads us to examine how the perceptual deadzone is affected by the rate of change in the kinesthetic force stimulus. In this chapter, we take up this particular study. For this purpose, we design an experiment where a user is exposed to either a linearly increasing (positive slope) or decreasing (negative slope) haptic force stimulus with a varying slope S, and is asked to react to the change. We intend to find a decision boundary as a function of the rate of change of stimulus (slope) to compute the Weber fraction. We apply both parametric and nonparametric classifiers on the recorded data to estimate the best-fit decision boundary. We demonstrate that the Weber fraction decreases monotonically with an increase in the slope for both positive and negative regions. It means that as the slope is increased, the change in the signal is more easily perceivable. We also demonstrate that there is an asymmetric behavior of perception between the increasing and the decreasing force stimuli. Hence, it has been shown that the assumption of a fixed Weber fraction for a user is not correct and it is a monotonic function of the temporal variation of the stimulus.

read more

References
More filters
BookDOI

Density estimation for statistics and data analysis

TL;DR: The Kernel Method for Multivariate Data: Three Important Methods and Density Estimation in Action.
Proceedings Article

A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection

TL;DR: The results indicate that for real-word datasets similar to the authors', the best method to use for model selection is ten fold stratified cross validation even if computation power allows using more folds.
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimization by Simulated Annealing: Quantitative Studies

TL;DR: Experimental studies of the simulated annealing method are presented and its computational efficiency when applied to graph partitioning and traveling salesman problems are presented.
Book

Human Factors in Engineering and Design

TL;DR: Human factors in engineering and design, Human factors in Engineering and design as mentioned in this paper, human factors in design and engineering, human factor in engineering, and design in software engineering and software engineering.

Human factors engineering and design

TL;DR: Human factors engineering and design, Human factors engineering, and design of human factors, human factors engineering as discussed by the authors, human factor engineering, human factor design, and the design of the human factors.
Related Papers (5)