scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of surface roughness on droplet splashing

28 Dec 2017-Physics of Fluids (AIP Publishing LLC)-Vol. 29, Iss: 12, pp 122105
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors found that a slightly rough substrate triggers corona splashing which is suppressed to prompt splashing by both further increase and further decrease of surface roughness.
Abstract: It is well known that rough surfaces trigger prompt splashing and suppress corona splashing on droplet impact. Upon water droplet impact, we experimentally found that a slightly rough substrate triggers corona splashing which is suppressed to prompt splashing by both further increase and further decrease of surface roughness. The nonmonotonic effect of surface roughness on corona splashing weakens with decreasing droplet surface tension. The threshold velocities for prompt splashing and corona splashing are quantified under different conditions including surface roughness, droplet diameter, and droplet surface tension. It is determined that slight roughness significantly enhances both prompt splashing and corona splashing of a water droplet, whereas it weakly affects low-surface-tension droplet splashing. Consistent with previous studies, high roughness triggers prompt splashing and suppresses corona splashing. Further experiments on droplet spreading propose that the mechanism of slight roughness enhanci...
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is found that this maximum dynamic contact angle, together with the liquid properties, the ratio of the peak to peak roughness and the surface feature mean width, determines the splashing to no-splashing threshold.
Abstract: Whether a droplet splashes upon impact onto a solid is known to depend not only on the fluid properties and its speed, but also on the substrate characteristics. Past research has shown that splashing is heavily influenced by the substrate roughness. Indeed, in this manuscript, we demonstrate that splashing is ruled by the surface roughness, the splashing ratio, and the dynamic contact angle. Experiments consist of water and ethanol droplets impacting onto solid substrates with varying degrees of roughness. High speed imaging is used to extract the dynamic contact angle as a function of the spreading speed for these impacting droplets. During the spreading phase, the dynamic contact angle achieves an asymptotic maximum value, which depends on the substrate roughness and the liquid properties. We found that this maximum dynamic contact angle, together with the liquid properties, the ratio of the peak to peak roughness and the surface feature mean width, determines the splashing to no-splashing threshold. In addition, these parameters consistently differentiate the splashing behaviour of impacts onto smooth hydrophilic, hydrophobic and superhydrophobic surfaces.

63 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Oblique droplet impacts onto a smooth surface at various inclination angles and at different ambient gas pressures were investigated using high-speed photography and it was found that the droplet splash can be entirely suppressed either by increasing the inclination angle or by reducing the ambient pressure.
Abstract: Oblique droplet impacts onto a smooth surface at various inclination angles and at different ambient gas pressures were investigated using high-speed photography. It was found that the droplet splash can be entirely suppressed either by increasing the inclination angle or by reducing the ambient pressure. Variations of the threshold angle required for the splash suppression as a function of the impact velocity were determined, as well as the threshold pressure as a function of the inclination angle and the impact velocity. The threshold pressure increases monotonically as the inclination angle increases for small enough impact velocities but varies in a nonmonotonic manner for high enough impact velocities. Modifications of the existing splash model permit the theoretical determination of the splash threshold conditions that agree well with the experimental observations. It is shown that it is the velocity of the lamella tip that determines the splash onset.

59 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors determined the ambient gas pressure for splashing of low-viscosity liquid drops on smooth dry surfaces as they change the control parameters: drop impact velocity, drop radius, viscosity, surface tension, density, and gas molecular weight.
Abstract: The ambient gas pressure is determined for the onset of splashing of low-viscosity liquid drops on smooth dry surfaces as we change the control parameters: drop impact velocity, drop radius, viscosity, surface tension, density, and gas molecular weight. This threshold pressure indicates that there are two distinct regimes when drop impact velocity is varied. By rescaling data using functions of only three dimensionless numbers, the commonly used Reynolds and Weber numbers, as well as the ratio of drop radius to gas mean free path, all data is collapsed to a single curve that encompasses both regimes.

40 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Wang et al. as mentioned in this paper investigated the dynamic behaviors of water droplets over wide ranges of diameters and velocities, and put forward a prediction model of droplet splashing threshold, considering the effect of surface wettability.

39 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the spreading characteristics of water droplets impacted on a solid spherical target have been investigated experimentally and theoretically and the morphological outcome of this impingement process has been quantitatively discussed with three geometric parameters, namely, liquid film thickness at the north-pole of the target surface, spread factor, and the maximum spread angle.
Abstract: In this study, the spreading characteristics of water droplets impacted on a solid spherical target have been investigated experimentally and theoretically. Droplet impact and postimpact feature studies have been conducted on hydrophilic and superhydrophobic spherical surfaces. Effects of the impact Weber number and target-to-drop diameter ratio on the spreading hydrodynamics have been discussed. Postcollision dynamics are explored with side and top views of impaction phenomenon using a high speed imaging technique. The morphological outcome of this impingement process has been quantitatively discussed with three geometric parameters, namely, liquid film thickness at the north-pole of the target surface, spread factor, and the maximum spread angle. Observations revel that spread factor and the maximum spread angle increases with the decrease in the size of the spherical target, whereas opposite of this is true for liquid film thickness at the north-pole of the target surface. Temporal variations of liquid film thickness at the north pole of the target have been plotted and found in agreement with the theoretical predictions made in the earlier studies. Finally, a mathematical model based on the energy balance principle has been proposed to predict the maximum spread angle on spherical targets. The theoretical values are found in good agreement with the experimental results for a wide range of spherical diameters studied. The findings may have implications toward a better understanding of fluid wetting, spraying, and coating behavior of complex shapes and geometries.

30 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a review deals with drop impacts on thin liquid layers and dry surfaces, referred to as splashing, and their propagation is discussed in detail, as well as some additional kindred, albeit nonsplashing, phenomena like drop spreading and deposition, receding (recoil), jetting, fingering, and rebound.
Abstract: The review deals with drop impacts on thin liquid layers and dry surfaces. The impacts resulting in crown formation are referred to as splashing. Crowns and their propagation are discussed in detail, as well as some additional kindred, albeit nonsplashing, phenomena like drop spreading and deposition, receding (recoil), jetting, fingering, and rebound. The review begins with an explanation of various practical motivations feeding the interest in the fascinating phenomena of drop impact, and the above-mentioned topics are then considered in their experimental, theoretical, and computational aspects.

2,077 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a model of the deposition-splashing boundary in terms of Reynolds number and Ohnesorge number is presented, which is only achieved if the normal velocity component of the impinging droplets is used in these dimensionless numbers.

1,073 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors focus on recent experimental and theoretical studies, which aim at unraveling the underlying physics, characterized by the delicate interplay of liquid inertia, viscosity, and surface tension, but also the surrounding gas.
Abstract: A drop hitting a solid surface can deposit, bounce, or splash. Splashing arises from the breakup of a fine liquid sheet that is ejected radially along the substrate. Bouncing and deposition depend crucially on the wetting properties of the substrate. In this review, we focus on recent experimental and theoretical studies, which aim at unraveling the underlying physics, characterized by the delicate interplay of not only liquid inertia, viscosity, and surface tension, but also the surrounding gas. The gas cushions the initial contact; it is entrapped in a central microbubble on the substrate; and it promotes the so-called corona splash, by lifting the lamella away from the solid. Particular attention is paid to the influence of surface roughness, natural or engineered to enhance repellency, relevant in many applications.

994 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss experimental and theoretical progress revealing the physical mechanisms behind dynamical wetting transitions and discuss microscopic processes that have been proposed to resolve the moving contact line paradox and identify the different dynamical regimes of contact line motion.
Abstract: The speed at which a liquid can move over a solid surface is strongly limited when a three-phase contact line is present, separating wet from dry regions. When enforcing large contact line speeds, this leads to the entrainment of drops, films, or air bubbles. In this review, we discuss experimental and theoretical progress revealing the physical mechanisms behind these dynamical wetting transitions. In this context, we discuss microscopic processes that have been proposed to resolve the moving–contact line paradox and identify the different dynamical regimes of contact line motion.

677 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Experimental scaling relations support a model in which compressible effects in the gas are responsible for splashing in liquid solid impacts.
Abstract: The corona splash due to the impact of a liquid drop on a smooth dry substrate is investigated with high-speed photography. A striking phenomenon is observed: splashing can be completely suppressed by decreasing the pressure of the surrounding gas. The threshold pressure where a splash first occurs is measured as a function of the impact velocity and found to scale with the molecular weight of the gas and the viscosity of the liquid. Both experimental scaling relations support a model in which compressible effects in the gas are responsible for splashing in liquid solid impacts.

652 citations