Efficient Recognition of Forest Species Biodiversity by Inventory-Based Geospatial Approach Using LISS IV Sensor
Abstract: Tropical forest is one of the great biodiversity repositories of the world ecosystem. Biodiversity is depleting very fast due to conversion of forest region into agricultural or other land use. Here comes the role of biodiversity assessment and evaluation of spatial data of species to prioritize the conservation purposes. Traditionally, ground-based plots were used to assess different biodiversity. Later on, remote sensing approaches were also incorporated along with field-based studies to quantify the results accurately. Assessment of biodiversity constitutes estimation of various indices that were obtained using ground-based plot or survey. With the advancement of the remote sensing technology, spatial information about tree species was collected using field sample and satellite data and field sample plots within the Sariska Tiger Reserve. Different diversity indices were calculated like α, β, diversity, and others, i.e., Pilot's index (J), Shannon-Wiener index (SR), Margalef index (E w ), and Whittaker's index (H'). The multistage statistical techniques, which integrate high spatial resolution and spectral characteristics of satellite data (LISS IV), will help in providing precise information about tree species. Regression analysis provides better results to identify forest species among different bands. A positive correlation has been found in the infrared band even negative correlation has been found in other bands. This paper incorporates field-based surveys along with remote sensing technologies using a regression model (r 2 = 0.636) to estimate and recognize different species diversity in Sariska Tiger Reserve.
...read more
Citations
32 citations
31 citations
Cites background from "Efficient Recognition of Forest Spe..."
...…in LULC domain (Thenkabail and Lyon 2016) to accurately identify different features using unique spectral information (St-Louis et al. 2009; Kumar et al. 2015), attributed to their unique signature due to chemical and physical properties (Gould 2000; Gillespie et al. 2008; Palmer et al.…...
[...]
...…ob er 20 18 _2 01 81 00 5a .p df . e T IR m ea su re s bo th da y an d ni gh t da ta w ith 1 da yt im e im ag e an d 1 ni gh ttim e im ag e ev er y 5 da ys . multispectral images have high spatial resolution but they are unable to identify different feature in the similar group (Kumar et al. 2015)....
[...]
...For example, in plants, they differ due to pigments, structure and water content (Kalacska et al. 2007; White et al. 2010; Kumar et al. 2015; Thenkabail and Lyon 2016; Pandey et al. 2019) and soil have different spectral signature due to variation in iron oxides, organic matter, clays, calcite,…...
[...]
19 citations
Cites background from "Efficient Recognition of Forest Spe..."
...In terms of the succession, and concept of continuum of vegetation, the large-scale formations in the area are Acacia catechu and Anogeissu spendula vegetation types (Jain et al. 2016; Kumar et al. 2015)....
[...]
10 citations
10 citations
References
10,689 citations
8,553 citations
"Efficient Recognition of Forest Spe..." refers background in this paper
...Pielou’s Index (J): It is the comparison of actual Shannon-Wiener with Shannon-Wiener if species had an equal proportion (log S) [39], J = H ′ ln (S) (8)...
[...]
4,147 citations
"Efficient Recognition of Forest Spe..." refers methods in this paper
...The Whittaker’s index of β-diversity [38] was calculated using the following equation....
[...]
2,155 citations
2,024 citations