El trabajo en beneficio de la comunidad como pena para la violencia familiar
01 Jan 2007-Iss: 19, pp 397-426
TL;DR: The presente trabajo pretende abordar un aspecto de la penalidad sobre el que no se han centrado las aportaciones de los autoEL TRABAJO EN BENEFICIO DE LA COMUNIDAD COMO PENA PARA LA VIOLENCIA FAMILIAR.
Abstract: La discusion acerca de la legislacion mas reciente sobre la violencia domestica y de genero ha tendido a centrarse en general en el incremento punitivo experimentado en este ambito desde 1989 hasta la fecha, y en particular en la distinta penalidad prevista en algunos tipos penales cuando la victima es mujer pareja, y la posible vulneracion del principio de igualdad y de proporcionalidad en estos casos2. El presente trabajo pretende abordar un aspecto de la penalidad sobre el que no se han centrado las aportaciones de los autoEL TRABAJO EN BENEFICIO DE LA COMUNIDAD COMO PENA PARA LA VIOLENCIA FAMILIAR
Citations
More filters
18 Nov 2010
TL;DR: In this article, the authors deal with treatment orders or educational programs as a community penalty applied to people sentenced for gender violence, and try to focus on the problems that confront the different actors intervening in it.
Abstract: This paper deals with ‘treatment orders’ or ‘educational programs’ as a community penalty applied to people sentenced for gender violence. The paper follows the implementation of this penalty and tries to focus on the problems that confront the different actors intervening in it. In the first part the judicial system is analyzed, in the second we show the problems that face the probation officers in Catalunya, and finally we approach the perspective of the psychologists who are directly engaged in the work with the men sentenced for gender violence.
6 citations
References
More filters
01 Jan 2004
8 citations
TL;DR: The alternative-to-custody-alternative-sentence debate has raged since the introduction of the scheme as mentioned in this paper and there has been a call in the Service for this argument to be resolved but it is apparent that there will be no resolution.
Abstract: serve only to add to their workload and there were even those sceptics who said it had nothing to offer at all. Since those early days when the first orders were made has the Service fully accepted Community Service into its domain? Are the polite introductions over and has Community Service settled down to live happily alongside the other responsibilities we undertake or is it an uneasy bedfellow? This article is an attempt to look at how the Service has learned to adopt this new family member, what issues the settling-in process has raised and how this latest arrival will affect its future development. Community Service undoubtedly means different things to different members of the Service. The alternative-to-custodylalternative-sentence debate has raged since the introduction of the scheme. There has been a call in the Service for this argument to be resolved but it is apparent that there will be no resolution. Certain recent events have only served to add momentum to the continuing debate. First the Advisory Council on the Penal System in its report published on 2nd August, 1977, states &dquo;We remain convinced that Community Service could be of particular value as a disposal in the less serious, non-imprisonable cases and should in due course be made freely available in respect of all offences&dquo;.’ The Home Office Research Study2 of the pilot schemes in their first year suggests that the proportion of individuals who were recommended for Community Service then given an active custodial sentence did not differ
4 citations
"El trabajo en beneficio de la comun..." refers background in this paper
...33-35; Winfield 1977:127; Young 1979:39-40; McIvor 1992:178-179, 1998a:55; Toch 2000:271....
[...]
...La pena de TBC desarrolla en los sujetos hábitos necesarios en la vida laboral, como la puntualidad o la capacidad de colaborar con otras personas (Winfield 1977:126; Morris 1993:16); 2....
[...]