Electron transport within the wurtzite and zinc-blende phases of gallium nitride and indium nitride
Summary (2 min read)
Introduction: The Controversial Nature of Transfer Factor
- Most immunologists have never heard of transfer factor (TF) despite the fact that it may be – emphasis on “may” — one of the most important discoveries ever made in immunology.
- The thesis of this review is that TF research was abandoned prematurely.
- Each clone is therefore predetermined to produce a single, unique T cell receptor, B cell receptor or antibody sequence.
- Only in the best cases did investigators employ partially purified materials and it was not until the early 1980s that the specific molecular nature of TF began to emerge (Wilson and Fudenberg, 1983).
- TF was universally characterized as having a molecular weight greater than 3000 daltons and less than 12,000.
The Peptide Fragment of TF
- It is important to note that some TF researchers have argued that the peptide contained in TF preparations is not derived from the antigen.
- Borkowsky and Lawrence (1981), Petersen, et al. (1983), and Kirkpatrick (1988) each immunized animals with an antigen, isolated the TF fraction, and then used various methods to adsorb the active ingredients of the TF fraction.
- Before passing on to the characterization of the RNA component of TF, it is worth considering what the peptide component might be if it is not derived from antigen.
- Another possibility is that the peptide is (like the protamine in the Hoerr beta galactosidase experiment summarized above) only present to stabilize the RNA component against RNAases.
The RNA Component of TF
- Because the RNA component of TF is also uncharacterized, many of the questions just raised about the peptide component remain unresolved for the RNA component.
- Fudenberg (Wilson and Fudenberg, 1981; Wilson, Paddock & Fudenberg, 1981; Wilson, Paddock & Fudenberg, 1982; Wilson and Fudenberg, 1983) proposed a model of TF consisting of a peptide conjugated to a diribonucleotide.
- Rifkind (Rifkind, et al., 1976; 1977) reported that treating TF isolates with RNAase resulted in release of a peptide or RNP that lost TF activity, suggesting that RNA was a critical component of specific TF.
- Another possibility is that the peptide binds specifically to double-stranded RNAs.
How Specific is TF Activity?
- TF research has, since its inception, focused largely on two problems besides the physicochemical nature of TF.
- The other involved fourteen patients treated for AIDS-related cryptosporidiosis, which yielded very significantly positive results (McMeeking, et al., 1990).
- Friedman (1973) showed that TF induced by Shigella lipopolysaccharides produced immunity completely distinguishable from that induced against sheep red blood cells or Salmonella vaccine.
- Also, Kirkpatrick (1993) demonstrated that murine TF raised against ovalbumin, cytochrome c, ferritin, horse radish peroxidase, and a random copolymer of glutamic acid, lysine and alanine each induced immunity in recipients that was not cross-reactive with the other antigens.
How Transfer Factor Challenges the Standard Model of Immunological Activation
- Assuming TF exists and has the kinds of properties that investigators have associated with it, then the consequences for immunological theory are potentially revolutionary.
- And secondly, there should be no set of naïve clones that could be programmed (or reprogrammed) by whatever message TF carries.
- This possibility has been overlooked because it is at odds with current immunological dogma, which states that there are no such uncommitted cells.
- Finally, experiments involving tadpoles, which have only about 10,000 total lymphocytes, have failed to identify any antigen against which a specific antibody response cannot be induced (Du Pasquier, 1976).
Is TF Part of a Eukaryotic CRISPR-Cas-Like System?
- Basten and Edwards (1976) reported, for example, that TF isolates from mice contain fragments of I-region gene products, which is to say, hypervariable region sequences.
- Might the RNA component in TF therefore be hypervariable region-encoding (HRE) RNAs.
- Reasons for rejecting the Dogma’s prohibition of reverse translation have been addressed by several investigators (RootBernstein, 1983; Nakashima and Fox, 1986; Nashimoto, 2001) and essentially amount to the fact that the prohibition against reverse translation is based on lack of evidence.
New Tests of TF
- For the many reasons discussed above, I believe that it is well worth exploring whether TF exists and has the properties ascribed to it by previous investigators.
- In order to do so, new approaches are required.
- If such data are forthcoming, an obvious follow-up would be to search for a CRISPR-Cas-like mechanism within TCR and BCR capable of generating hypervariable regions for these proteins.
- Moreover, the sequence relationship, if any, between the peptide and the RNA components of TF will easily become apparent by using such a well-defined antigen.
- Most importantly, technologies developed since 1990 make it possible to identify and track the production of TF by the immune system.
Conclusion: A Few Notes on the History and Philosophy of Discovery
- In concluding, it is worth placing TF research within a more general framework of the history and philosophy of biomedical discovery.
- To begin with, while skepticism is one of the most important of scientific tools, I believe that the authors should doubt most those results that best fit their preconceptions and take most seriously those that challenge them.
- TF certainly challenges many aspects of modern immunology and molecular biology.
- On the other hand, its effects have been reported so often by so many diverse groups that to ignore its possible existence seems obtuse.
- Precisely for this reason, the authors must take it most seriously and most rigorously test TF.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
436 citations
258 citations
29 citations
9 citations
9 citations
References
21,954 citations
13,886 citations
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q2. What is the main factor responsible for the low-field electron drift velocity?
For applied electric fields strengths in excess of 4 kV/cm, the electron drift velocity decreases in response to further increases in the applied electric field strength, i.e., a region of negative differential mobility is observed, the electron drift velocity eventually saturating at about 1.0 × 107 cm/s for sufficiently high applied electric field strengths.
Q3. What are the contributions in "Electron transport within the wurtzite and zinc-blende phases of gallium nitride and indium nitride" ?
In this paper, steady-state and transient electron transport results, corresponding to the wurtzite and zinc-blende phases of GaN and InN, were presented, these results being obtained from Monte Carlo simulations of electron transport within these materials.
Q4. What is the basic classification of scattering processes within semiconductors?
In general, scattering processes within semiconductors can be classified into three basic types: (1) phonon scattering, (2) defect scattering, i.e., related to lattice dislocations, and (3) carrier scattering [95].
Q5. What is the fundamental issue at stake in the study of electron transport?
The motion of these electrons, which in large measure determines the performance of such a device, is the fundamental issue at stake in the study of electron transport.
Q6. What is the effect of the applied electric field strength on the electron drift velocity?
The authors note that initially, the electron drift velocity monotonically increases with the applied electric field strength, reaching a maximum of about 3.3 × 107 cm/s when the applied electric field strength is around 50 kV/cm.
Q7. What is the principal factor responsible for the effect of the low energy conduction band valley?
The large non-parabolicity of the lowest energy conduction band valley is the principal factor responsible for this effect [157].
Q8. What search terms were used for the identification of papers focused on the wurtzite?
For the identification of papers focused only on the zinc-blende phases of these materials, the search terms “gallium nitride zinc blende” and “indium nitride zinc blende” were employed.
Q9. What is the peak electron drift velocity of wurtzite and zinc-blen?
For the case of zinc-blende GaAs, the peak electron drift velocity, 1.6 × 107 cm/s , occursat a much lower applied electric field strength than that for the other compound semiconductors considered in this analysis, i.e., only 4 kV/cm.
Q10. What is the effect of the doping concentration on the velocity-field characteristics associated with the wide?
the velocity-field characteristics associated with the wide energy gap compound semiconductors, GaN and InN, are less sensitive to variations in the doping concentration than those associated with zinc-blende GaAs; in fact, for the case of 1019 cm-3 doping, the peak in the velocity-field characteristic associated with zincblende GaAs completely disappears, the velocity-field characteristic associated with zinc-blende GaAs monotonically increasing with the applied electric field strength until saturation is achieved for this particular case.
Q11. What is the fundamental issue at stake when the electron transport within a semiconductor is studied?
Understanding how the electron ensemble evolves in response to the application of an electric field, in essence, represents the fundamental issue at stake when the electron transport within a semiconductor is studied [95].
Q12. What is the velocity-field characteristic of zinc-blende GaAs?
As with the cases of wurtzite and zinc-blende GaN and InN, a linear regime of electron transport is observed for the case of zinc-blende GaAs, the low-field electron drift mobility, μ, corresponding to the velocity-field characteristic depicted in Figure 3.13, being about 5400 cm2/V.s.
Q13. What is the common simplified assumption used to represent the electron transport within a semiconductor?
The three-valley model used to represent the conduction band electron band structure associated with bulk wurtzite GaN for the Monte Carlo simulations of the electron transport within this material.
Q14. What is the role of the electron effective mass in defining the low-field electron drift mobility?
The electron effective mass plays an important role in defining the low-field electron drift mobility, the higher this mass the lower the corresponding low-field electron drift mobility.
Q15. How is the low-field electron drift mobility observed for zinc-blende InN?
As with the cases of wurtzite and zinc-blende GaN, and wurtzite InN, a linear regime of electron transport is observed for the case of zinc-blende InN, the low-field electron drift mobility, corresponding to the velocity-field characteristic depicted in Figure 3.10, being about 4400 cm2/V.s.
Q16. What is the low-field electron drift mobility for wurtzite?
As with the cases of wurtzite and zinc-blende GaN, a linear regime of electron transport is observed for the case of wurtzite InN, the low-field electron drift mobility, 𝜇, corresponding to the velocity-field characteristic depicted in Figure 3.7, being about 8700 cm2/V.s .