Elite parties, poor voters: : How social services win votes in India.
Citations
78 citations
Cites background from "Elite parties, poor voters: : How s..."
...…is with India’s sizeable but minority Muslim population who are purportedly aligned with secular forces domestically and outside forces to seek to destroy the Hindu Nation and which the secular Congress Party governments of previous times had failed to deal with (see Chacko 2018; Thachil 2014)....
[...]
...…by social welfare policies targeted at the newly urbanised “neo-middle” classes and social welfare and village-level developmental work undertaken by social organisations linked to the BJP that cater to the poor, in order to cement their allegiance to the Hindutva cause (Chacko 2018; Thachil 2014)....
[...]
...destroy the Hindu Nation and which the secular Congress Party governments of previous times had failed to deal with (see Chacko 2018; Thachil 2014)....
[...]
...order to cement their allegiance to the Hindutva cause (Chacko 2018; Thachil 2014)....
[...]
66 citations
57 citations
32 citations
Cites background from "Elite parties, poor voters: : How s..."
...For excellent studies of religious groups serving as catalysts for the distribution of social services such as housing and education, see Cammett (2014) and Thachil (2014)....
[...]
32 citations
Cites background from "Elite parties, poor voters: : How s..."
...…organized and channeled by party systems (Yadav, 1999; Corbridge and Harriss, 2000), pacified with welfare schemes (de Wit, 1997; Chatterjee, 2008; Thachil, 2014), subjugated with physical or structural violence (Hansen, 2001; Gupta, 2012), governed and governmentalized with technologies to…...
[...]
...Scholars of modern India have chronicled the myriad ways in which the paradoxes and inequities of postcolonial democracy have been managed, mitigated, mobilized and otherwise mediated––hierarchically arranged in patronage relations (Piliavsky, 2014), organized and channeled by party systems (Yadav, 1999; Corbridge and Harriss, 2000), pacified with welfare schemes (de Wit, 1997; Chatterjee, 2008; Thachil, 2014), subjugated with physical or structural violence (Hansen, 2001; Gupta, 2012), governed and governmentalized with technologies to appease and discipline subject populations (Chatterjee, 2008; Gupta, 2012), or negotiated and bargained through ‘instrumental’ uses of the political rights of franchise (Chatterjee, 2006: 40–41)––and have debated the extent to which these myriad forms of political mediation exhibit both continuity and departure from longstanding patterns and relations of socio-economic, structural and ritual authority....
[...]
References
78 citations
66 citations
57 citations
32 citations
32 citations