scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior.

Teun Terpstra
- 01 Oct 2011 - 
- Vol. 31, Iss: 10, pp 1658-1675
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The results indicate that both cognitive and affective mechanisms influence citizens' preparedness intentions, and that levels of dread were especially influenced by citizens' negative and positive emotions related to their previous flood hazard experiences.
Abstract
Despite the prognoses of the effects of global warming (e.g., rising sea levels, increasing river discharges), few international studies have addressed how flood preparedness should be stimulated among private citizens. This article aims to predict Dutch citizens' flood preparedness intentions by testing a path model, including previous flood hazard experiences, trust in public flood protection, and flood risk perceptions (both affective and cognitive components). Data were collected through questionnaire surveys in two coastal communities (n= 169, n= 244) and in one river area community (n= 658). Causal relations were tested by means of structural equation modeling (SEM). Overall, the results indicate that both cognitive and affective mechanisms influence citizens' preparedness intentions. First, a higher level of trust reduces citizens' perceptions of flood likelihood, which in turn hampers their flood preparedness intentions (cognitive route). Second, trust also lessens the amount of dread evoked by flood risk, which in turn impedes flood preparedness intentions (affective route). Moreover, the affective route showed that levels of dread were especially influenced by citizens' negative and positive emotions related to their previous flood hazard experiences. Negative emotions most often reflected fear and powerlessness, while positive emotions most frequently reflected feelings of solidarity. The results are consistent with the affect heuristic and the historical context of Dutch flood risk management. The great challenge for flood risk management is the accommodation of both cognitive and affective mechanisms in risk communications, especially when most people lack an emotional basis stemming from previous flood hazard events.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Risk Perception Paradox—Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards

TL;DR: A risk perception paradox exists in that it is assumed that high risk perception will lead to personal preparedness and, in the next step, to risk mitigation behavior, but this is not necessarily true, and three explanations are offered suggesting why this paradox might occur.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of risk perceptions and other factors that influence flood mitigation behavior.

TL;DR: It is concluded that the current focus on risk perceptions as a means to explain and promote private flood mitigation behavior is not supported on either theoretical or empirical grounds.
Journal ArticleDOI

Perception and communication of flood risks: a systematic review of empirical research.

TL;DR: This review comprises 57 empirically based peer-reviewed articles on flood risk perception and communication from the Web of Science and Scopus databases and concludes with a summary on methodological issues in the fields of flood-risk perception and flood- risk communication.
Journal ArticleDOI

Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards

TL;DR: In this article, the authors stress that risks in the context of natural hazards always involve interactions between natural (physical) and human (behavioural) factors, and that access to information and capacity for self-protection are typically distributed unevenly within populations.
References
More filters
Book

Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling

TL;DR: The book aims to provide the skills necessary to begin to use SEM in research and to interpret and critique the use of method by others.
Book

Structural Equation Modeling With Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, And Programming

TL;DR: Structural Equation Models: The Basics using the EQS Program and testing for Construct Validity: The Multitrait-Multimethod Model and Change Over Time: The Latent Growth Curve Model.
Book Chapter

Summary for Policymakers

TL;DR: The Global Energy Assessment (GEA) as mentioned in this paper identifies strategies that could help resolve the multiple challenges simultaneously and bring multiple benefits, including sustainable economic and social development, poverty eradication, adequate food production and food security, health for all, climate protection, conservation of ecosystems, and security.
Journal ArticleDOI

Perception of risk.

Paul Slovic
- 17 Apr 1987 - 
TL;DR: This research aims to aid risk analysis and policy-making by providing a basis for understanding and anticipating public responses to hazards and improving the communication of risk information among lay people, technical experts, and decision-makers.
Related Papers (5)