Empathetic Repair after Mass Trauma : When Vengeance is Arrested
Citations
129 citations
Cites background from "Empathetic Repair after Mass Trauma..."
...In particular, this interpretation emphasizes the link between the process of rehumanization of the other and empathy (Halpern and Weinstein 2004), that is, the process which sees the other in human terms (Gobodo-Madikizela 2008)....
[...]
...…as sufferer too, as an emotional human being; to empathize with one who wronged someone is to struggle to get over resentment, anger, and hatred (Gobodo-Madikizela 2008).1 To put this more directly, teachers and students need to actively create a reconciliatory empathetic space for this to…...
[...]
...being; to empathize with one who wronged someone is to struggle to get over resentment, anger, and hatred (Gobodo-Madikizela 2008)....
[...]
...‘Woundedness’, writes Gobodo-Madikizela (2008), ‘is a sign of ethical responsibility towards the other....
[...]
82 citations
References
[...]
7,650 citations
4,285 citations
2,986 citations
"Empathetic Repair after Mass Trauma..." refers background or methods in this paper
...There exists a tension within political theory about the ‘touchy-feely’ concept of emotions, which has been variously referred to as ‘anti-political’ (Arendt, 1998) or a ‘swampy’ issue that contributes to ‘semantic confusion’ (Fletcher, 1966: 15). This is surprising, especially since some of the critics of the place of psychology in forgiveness themselves allude to the primacy of emotions in their formulations of the concept of forgiveness. Arendt (1998), for example, refers to the process of forgiveness as the opposite of vengeance, a reaction to trauma and putting an end to the effects of the original trauma....
[...]
...It invites too, victims and villains to share in the common idiom of humanity, to re-‘discover’ the other’s human face, which is consistent with the Arendtian idea of pursuing political action by beginning anew. This woundedness, and the remorse that animates it, draw perpetrators into relationship with victims. Interestingly, Jankélévitch (2005) distinguishes between relational forgiveness (‘Forgiveness is a dialogue’) and the ‘soliloquy’ of remorse....
[...]
...Hannah Arendt (1998) argues that ‘action’ is the essence of value in human life; human beings have the freedom and capacity for action....
[...]
...In The Human Condition, Hannah Arendt (1998) writes that those offences we call ‘“radical evil” . . . transcend the realm of human affairs’ and are therefore neither punishable nor forgivable....
[...]
...After exploring the process of forgiveness and explaining some of its challenges, I will argue, first, that the notion of the ‘unforgivable’ is no longer tenable in light of what we have witnessed in the work of South Africa’s TRC and in reconciliation efforts in other countries such as in post-genocide Rwanda; Arendt’s (1998) ideas and worldview were shaped and inspired by her observations and reactions to the events of World War II, particularly the Holocaust, at a time before alternative notions of justice, for instance, restorative justice, came into popular use in Western culture....
[...]
2,171 citations