Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey
Citations
7 citations
7 citations
7 citations
7 citations
7 citations
Cites background from "Energy efficiency and consumption —..."
...Greening et al. (2000) state that the size of rebound effects can be insignificant – depending on the definition of rebound being used – or can at the other extreme result in an overall increase in consumption. Discussed simply, homeowners may, via a range of possible mechanisms, benefit financially from improved energy efficiency measures and then ‘rebound’ by using the rewards of these benefits to instigate behaviour that increases electricity use through other means or increased intensity or repetition of the original behaviour. Sorrell and Dimitripoulos (2008) make the economic case for rebound effects, presenting the idea that replacing appliances with more energy-efficient models could be expected to reduce overall electricity consumption....
[...]
...Greening et al. (2000) state that the size of rebound effects can be insignificant – depending on the definition of rebound being used – or can at the other extreme result in an overall increase in consumption. Discussed simply, homeowners may, via a range of possible mechanisms, benefit financially from improved energy efficiency measures and then ‘rebound’ by using the rewards of these benefits to instigate behaviour that increases electricity use through other means or increased intensity or repetition of the original behaviour. Sorrell and Dimitripoulos (2008) make the economic case for rebound effects, presenting the idea that replacing appliances with more energy-efficient models could be expected to reduce overall electricity consumption. However, by drawing on Greening et al.’s (2000) direct and indirect rebound effects they explain how responses counteract this reduction. Direct effects may occur for example when efficient appliances effectively become cheaper to run, which could lead to the appliance being used more often, therefore reducing the energy savings achieved through efficiency improvements. Indirect effects may result from financial savings accrued through efficiency improvements being used to invest in other consumption-intensive activities or products. This can be demonstrated, for example, by cost savings gained through insulation or heating system improvements, which may then be used to buy newer, more energy-intensive appliances for the home. However, others suggest that this rebound effect is oversimplified, particularly if the investigation of electricity consumption stems from an industrial ecological approach. Hertwich (2005) suggests that additional mechanisms have an impact, and that a more accurate and neutral description – that avoids the negative attention sometimes afforded to what can be positive...
[...]
...Greening et al. (2000) state that the size of rebound effects can be insignificant – depending on the definition of rebound being used – or can at the other extreme result in an overall increase in consumption. Discussed simply, homeowners may, via a range of possible mechanisms, benefit financially from improved energy efficiency measures and then ‘rebound’ by using the rewards of these benefits to instigate behaviour that increases electricity use through other means or increased intensity or repetition of the original behaviour. Sorrell and Dimitripoulos (2008) make the economic case for rebound effects, presenting the idea that replacing appliances with more energy-efficient models could be expected to reduce overall electricity consumption. However, by drawing on Greening et al.’s (2000) direct and indirect rebound effects they explain how responses counteract this reduction....
[...]
...Greening et al. (2000) state that the size of rebound effects can be insignificant – depending on the definition of rebound being used – or can at the other extreme result in an overall increase in consumption....
[...]
References
3,952 citations
1,422 citations
1,361 citations
802 citations
726 citations