1
SAND77-1035
Unlimited
Release
This
report
was
pre
:.:ICE--
--
-
sponsored by the
Uni~cd
S as
an
aecount
of
work
the United States nor
thllt~
~vernment.
Neither
Reaearch and Oevel e mted States EncrJY
theft
employea
:rnent
Adrnirustl'ltion, nor any
of
aubcontnctors,
~r
1
~e:'"Yem
0
~
theit
co
nt
ractors,
warranty,
upreu
or implied P oycea, nllkes
1ny
liability
or
rcsporu;ibilit· •
or
••ume.s any
lep]
or utefulne•
of
any i
{for
t~c
ICClltlcy, completeness
pro~
disclosed,
or
~e;::~~~~n~p::'ttll,
product
or
mfnnge PriVItely owned r.ighu. I use would not
ENERGY
LOSS
BY
THERMAL
CONDUCTION
AND
NATURAL
CONVECTION
IN
ANNULAR
SOLAR
RECEIVERsl
by
1
. k d
1'
2
A.
C.
Ratze
,
C.
E.
H1c
ox,
an
D.
K.
Gart
1ng
Fluid
and
Thermal
Sciences
Department
Sandia
Laboratories
Albuquerque,
NM
87115
USA
presented
at
Fifteenth
International
Thermal
Conductivity
Conference
Ottawa,
Ontario,
Canada
The
work
discussed
in
this
paper
was
supported
by
the
United
States
Energy
Research
and
Development
Administion.
Member~
u[
Llu.:!
Technicu.l
St.:1ff
~
ASTE
R
OIS
T
RIBhJT.IO
.N
OF
THIS
DOCU
ME C b
.
NT
IS
UNLJMIT£0
DISCLAIMER
This report was prepared as an
account
of
work
sponsored
by
an
agency
of
the United States Government. Neither the United States
Government
nor
any
agency Thereof,
nor
any
of
their
employees,
makes
any
warranty, express
or
implied,
or
assumes
any
legal
liability
or
responsibility
for
the accuracy, completeness,
or
usefulness
of
any
information, apparatus, product,
or
process
disclosed,
or
represents
that
its
use
would
not
infringe
privately
owned rights. Reference herein
to
any
specific
commercial product,
process,
or
service
by
trade name, trademark, manufacturer,
or
otherwise does
not
necessarily
constitute
or
imply
its
endorsement,
recommendation,
or
favoring
by
the United States Government
or
any
agency
thereof. The views and
opinions
of
authors expressed herein
do
not
necessarily state
or
reflect those
of
the United States
Government
or
any
agency
thereof.
DISCLAIMER
Portions
of
this
document
may
be
illegible
in
electronic
image
products.
Images
are
produced
from
the
best
available
original
document.
INTRODUCTION
An
effective
device
for
the
collection
of
solar
energy
is
the
so
called
parabolic-cylindrical
solar
collector.
In
this
device,
a
circular
r.eceiver
tube,
with
a
suitable
selective
coating,
is
en-
closed
by
a
concentric
glass
envelope
and
situated
along
the
focal
line
of
a
parabolic
trough
reflector.
The
heat
transfer
processes
which
occur
in
the
annular
space
between
the
receiver
tube
and
the
glass
envelope
are
important
in
determining
the
overall
heat
loss
from
the
receiver
tube.
In
typical
high
temperature
receiver
tube
designs
the
rate
of
energy
loss
by
combined
thermal
conduction
and
natural
convection
is
of
the
same
order
of
magnitude
as
that
due
to
thermal
radiation,
and
can
amount
to
approximately
6%
of
the
total
rate
at
which
energy
is
absorbed
by
the
solar
collector.
The
elimination
of
conduction
and
natural
convection
losses
can
signifi-
c·antly
improve
the
performance
of
a
large
collector
field.
In
this
paper,
several
techniques
useful
for
the
reduction
of
energy
loss
by
thermal
conduction
and
natural
convection
are
considered.
'.lhe
receiver
configuration
chosen
for
study
is
typical
of
those
used
in
the
Solar
Total
Energy
System
at
Sandia
Laboratories.
The
receiver
tube
has
a
"black
chrome"
selective
coating
and
is
2.54
em
in
outside
diameter.
The
inside
diameter
of
the
glass
envelope
is
approximately
4.4
em.
Typical
operating
temperatures
of
the
receiver
tube
and
glass
envelope
are
approximateli
573
K
and
373
K,
respectively.
CONDUCTION
HEAT
LOSS
Of
the
three
modes
of
heat
transfer,
the
most
significant
heat
loss
savings
for
an
annular
receiver
can
be
accomplished
by
limiting
..
-2-
conduction
losse~.
Convection
losses
are
negligible
so
long
as
the
annular
space
is
properly
sized.
Radiation
losses,
being_
pri-
marily
fixed
by
the
receiver
tube
selective
surface
properties,
are
more
difficult
to
reduce.
Variations
in
electroplating
parameters
to
reduce
the
receiver
thermal
emittance
properties
may
result
in
lower
solar
absorptivity
and
perhaps
poor
durability
_properties.
Attempts
to
limit
heat
transfer
through
the
annular
space
will
:be
discussed
in
the
f6llowing
sections.
Techniques
studied
include
{1)
evacuation
of
the
annulus
gas,
(2)
oversizing
the
arinular
space,
.and
(3)
using
gases
other
than
air
for
the
heat
transfer
medium.
·Effect
of
Vacuum
A
revie\v
of
the
literature
on
vacuum
technology
indicates
that
the
thermal
conductivity
of
a
gas
i~
a
function
of
the;
mean
free
p·ath
of
the
gas
molecule~
[1,
2,
3].
An
expression
relating
the
mean
free
path
of
a
gas
to
the
enclosure
pressure
and
gas
temperature
is
where
T,
P,
and
o
are
given
in
deg
K,
mm
Hg,
and
em,
respectively.
For
a
given
gas,
the
relative
magnitudes
of
the
molecular
mean
free
path
and
the
annulus
gap
determines
whether
the
effective
heat·
transfer
coefficient
for
thermal
conduction
is
(1)
.independent
of
annulus
pressure,
(2)
a
function
of
the
annulus
pressure,
or
(3)
negligible.
The
governing
equation
for
the
effective
heat
transfer
coefficient
for
the
annular
space
is
[1]
k
kef~
r.Ln(r
/r.)
+.bA(r./r
+
lf
~
0
~ ~
0
(2)