ESPEN endorsed recommendations: Nutritional therapy in major burns
Citations
2,947 citations
Cites background or result from "ESPEN endorsed recommendations: Nut..."
...In a subset of patients from the EPaNiC study for whom there was an absolute contraindication to the use of EN (such as bowel in discontinuity), Casaer et al showed that those patients for whom use of PN was started on ICU day 3 had worse infectious morbidity and were less likely to be discharged alive than those patients for whom PN was started instead on day 8.240 In a large RCT involving critically ill patients with a perceived contraindication to EN, use of PN within 24 hours of admission showed minimal benefit over STD where no nutrition therapy was provided (shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, WMD = −0.47 days; 95% CI, −0.82 to −0.11; P = .01), with no difference between groups with regard to infection, organ failure, total complications, or mortality.242 Because of the wide variation of nutrition risk in these populations, clinical judgment should be used to determine those less likely to benefit from PN....
[...]
...Although refeeding syndrome can occur with EN, the risk is higher with initiation of PN....
[...]
...5–2 g of protein/kg/d for patients with burn injury.(389,396)...
[...]
...Trauma patients provided IVFE-free PN over the first 10 days of hospitalization had a significant reduction in infectious morbidity (pneumonia, P = .05; catheter-related sepsis, P = .04) (Figure 10),266,268 decreased hospital and ICU LOS (P = .03 and P = .02), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .01) compared with those receiving SO-based IVFE-containing PN.268 However, the IVFE-free PN formulation was hypocaloric (21 kcal/kg/d vs 28 kcal/kg/d) as a result of leaving off the fat.268 A similar study comparing a hypocaloric IVFE-free regimen (1000 total kcal/d and 70 g of protein/d) versus an SO-based IVFE standard admixture (25 kcal/kg/d and 1.5 g of protein/d) found no significant differences in infectious complications, hospital LOS, or mortality.266 This finding was confirmed by a large observational study that reviewed outcomes in patients who received PN for ≥5 days in multi-international ICUs....
[...]
...When these alternative IVFEs (SMOF [soybean oil, MCT, olive oil, and fish oil emulsion], MCT, OO, and FO) become available in the United States, based on expert opinion, we suggest that their use be considered in the critically ill patient who is an appropriate candidate for PN. Rationale: In the United States at the present time, the choice of IVFE for PN is limited to a soy-based 18-carbon omega-6 fatty acid preparation....
[...]
1,734 citations
Cites background or result from "ESPEN endorsed recommendations: Nut..."
...In a subset of patients from the EPaNiC study for whom there was an absolute contraindication to the use of EN (such as bowel in discontinuity), Casaer et al showed that those patients for whom use of PN was started on ICU day 3 had worse infectious morbidity and were less likely to be discharged alive than those patients for whom PN was started instead on day 8.240 In a large RCT involving critically ill patients with a perceived contraindication to EN, use of PN within 24 hours of admission showed minimal benefit over STD where no nutrition therapy was provided (shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, WMD = −0.47 days; 95% CI, −0.82 to −0.11; P = .01), with no difference between groups with regard to infection, organ failure, total complications, or mortality.242 Because of the wide variation of nutrition risk in these populations, clinical judgment should be used to determine those less likely to benefit from PN....
[...]
...Although refeeding syndrome can occur with EN, the risk is higher with initiation of PN....
[...]
...5–2 g of protein/kg/d for patients with burn injury.(389,396)...
[...]
...Trauma patients provided IVFE-free PN over the first 10 days of hospitalization had a significant reduction in infectious morbidity (pneumonia, P = .05; catheter-related sepsis, P = .04) (Figure 10),266,268 decreased hospital and ICU LOS (P = .03 and P = .02), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (P = .01) compared with those receiving SO-based IVFE-containing PN.268 However, the IVFE-free PN formulation was hypocaloric (21 kcal/kg/d vs 28 kcal/kg/d) as a result of leaving off the fat.268 A similar study comparing a hypocaloric IVFE-free regimen (1000 total kcal/d and 70 g of protein/d) versus an SO-based IVFE standard admixture (25 kcal/kg/d and 1.5 g of protein/d) found no significant differences in infectious complications, hospital LOS, or mortality.266 This finding was confirmed by a large observational study that reviewed outcomes in patients who received PN for ≥5 days in multi-international ICUs....
[...]
...When these alternative IVFEs (SMOF [soybean oil, MCT, olive oil, and fish oil emulsion], MCT, OO, and FO) become available in the United States, based on expert opinion, we suggest that their use be considered in the critically ill patient who is an appropriate candidate for PN. Rationale: In the United States at the present time, the choice of IVFE for PN is limited to a soy-based 18-carbon omega-6 fatty acid preparation....
[...]
1,474 citations
Cites result from "ESPEN endorsed recommendations: Nut..."
...This has been confirmed in the latest meta-analysis [210,211], and is included in the specific ESPEN burn guidelines [212]....
[...]
204 citations
121 citations
Cites background from "ESPEN endorsed recommendations: Nut..."
...The metabolic rate of these patients can be greater than twice the normal rate, and this response can last for more than a year after the injury [1, 2]....
[...]
...severely burned patients (Table 2) [2, 75, 86, 87]....
[...]
...Because of this, nutritional support should ideally be initiated within 24 h of injury via an enteral route [2, 19]....
[...]
References
1,698 citations
1,085 citations
1,034 citations
760 citations
569 citations