scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy : A tutorial paper

Sacha Epskamp, +2 more
- 01 Feb 2018 - 
- Vol. 50, Iss: 1, pp 195-212
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors introduce the current state-of-the-art of network estimation and propose two novel statistical methods: the correlation stability coefficient and the bootstrapped difference test for edge-weights and centrality indices.
Abstract
The usage of psychological networks that conceptualize behavior as a complex interplay of psychological and other components has gained increasing popularity in various research fields. While prior publications have tackled the topics of estimating and interpreting such networks, little work has been conducted to check how accurate (i.e., prone to sampling variation) networks are estimated, and how stable (i.e., interpretation remains similar with less observations) inferences from the network structure (such as centrality indices) are. In this tutorial paper, we aim to introduce the reader to this field and tackle the problem of accuracy under sampling variation. We first introduce the current state-of-the-art of network estimation. Second, we provide a rationale why researchers should investigate the accuracy of psychological networks. Third, we describe how bootstrap routines can be used to (A) assess the accuracy of estimated network connections, (B) investigate the stability of centrality indices, and (C) test whether network connections and centrality estimates for different variables differ from each other. We introduce two novel statistical methods: for (B) the correlation stability coefficient, and for (C) the bootstrapped difference test for edge-weights and centrality indices. We conducted and present simulation studies to assess the performance of both methods. Finally, we developed the free R-package bootnet that allows for estimating psychological networks in a generalized framework in addition to the proposed bootstrap methods. We showcase bootnet in a tutorial, accompanied by R syntax, in which we analyze a dataset of 359 women with posttraumatic stress disorder available online.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights

TL;DR: A review of all empirical network studies published between 2010 and 2016 concludes that network analysis has yielded important insights and may provide an important inroad towards personalized medicine by investigating the network structures of individual patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Moving Forward: Challenges and Directions for Psychopathological Network Theory and Methodology:

TL;DR: Challenges to network theory may propel the network approach from its adolescence into adulthood and promises advances in understanding psychopathology both at the nomothetic and idiographic level.
Journal ArticleDOI

A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks.

TL;DR: This tutorial introduces the reader to estimating the most popular network model for psychological data: the partial correlation network and describes how regularization techniques can be used to efficiently estimate a parsimonious and interpretable network structure in psychological data.
Journal ArticleDOI

COVID stress syndrome: Concept, structure, and correlates.

TL;DR: Worry about the dangerousness of COVID‐19 is the central feature of the syndrome, and latent class analysis indicated that the syndrome is quasi‐dimensional, comprising five classes differing in syndrome severity.
Journal ArticleDOI

What Do Centrality Measures Measure in Psychological Networks

TL;DR: Critically examine several issues with the use of the most popular centrality indices in psychological networks: degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality, and conclude that betweenness and closness centrality seem especially unsuitable as measures of node importance.
References
More filters
Book

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

TL;DR: The concepts of power analysis are discussed in this paper, where Chi-square Tests for Goodness of Fit and Contingency Tables, t-Test for Means, and Sign Test are used.
Journal ArticleDOI

Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso

TL;DR: A new method for estimation in linear models called the lasso, which minimizes the residual sum of squares subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a constant, is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Collective dynamics of small-world networks

TL;DR: Simple models of networks that can be tuned through this middle ground: regular networks ‘rewired’ to introduce increasing amounts of disorder are explored, finding that these systems can be highly clustered, like regular lattices, yet have small characteristic path lengths, like random graphs.
Book

Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications

TL;DR: This paper presents mathematical representation of social networks in the social and behavioral sciences through the lens of Dyadic and Triadic Interaction Models, which describes the relationships between actor and group measures and the structure of networks.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the problem of estimating the sampling distribution of a pre-specified random variable R(X, F) on the basis of the observed data x.
Related Papers (5)