scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Estrogens and Androgens in Skeletal Physiology and Pathophysiology.

TL;DR: A comprehensive review of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of estrogens and androgens on bone, their influences on skeletal homeostasis during growth and adulthood, the pathogenetic mechanisms of the adverse effects of their deficiency on the female and male skeleton, as well as the role of natural and synthetic estrogenic or androgenic compounds in the pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis is provided.
Abstract: Estrogens and androgens influence the growth and maintenance of the mammalian skeleton and are responsible for its sexual dimorphism. Estrogen deficiency at menopause or loss of both estrogens and androgens in elderly men contribute to the development of osteoporosis, one of the most common and impactful metabolic diseases of old age. In the last 20 years, basic and clinical research advances, genetic insights from humans and rodents, and newer imaging technologies have changed considerably the landscape of our understanding of bone biology as well as the relationship between sex steroids and the physiology and pathophysiology of bone metabolism. Together with the appreciation of the side effects of estrogen-related therapies on breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases, these advances have also drastically altered the treatment of osteoporosis. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of action of estrogens and androgens on bone, their influences on skeletal homeostasis during growth and adulthood, the pathogenetic mechanisms of the adverse effects of their deficiency on the female and male skeleton, as well as the role of natural and synthetic estrogenic or androgenic compounds in the pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis. We highlight latest advances on the crosstalk between hormonal and mechanical signals, the relevance of the antioxidant properties of estrogens and androgens, the difference of their cellular targets in different bone envelopes, the role of estrogen deficiency in male osteoporosis, and the contribution of estrogen or androgen deficiency to the monomorphic effects of aging on skeletal involution.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
13 Dec 2018-Cell
TL;DR: Irisin is secreted by muscle, increases with exercise, and mediates certain favorable effects of physical activity as discussed by the authors, however, the skeletal response to exercise is less clear, and the receptor for irisin has not been identified.

323 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
Eli Coleman, Asa Radix, Walter Pierre Bouman, George R. Brown, Annelou L. C. de Vries, Madeline B. Deutsch, Randi Ettner, Lin Fraser, Michael Goodman, J.A Green, Adrienne B. Hancock, Thomas W. Johnson, Dan H. Karasic, Gail Knudson, Scott Leibowitz, H.F.L. Meyer-Bahlburg, Stan Monstrey, Joz Motmans, Leena Nahata, Timo O. Nieder, Sari L. Reisner, C Richards, Loren S. Schechter, Vin Tangpricha, Amy C. Tishelman, Mick van Trotsenburg, Stephen Winter, Kelly Ducheny, Noah Adams, Thays Adrián, Luke Allen, David Azul, Harjit Bagga, Kazi Mohammad Nurul Basar, David S. Bathory, Javier Belinky, David R. Berg, Jens U. Berli, R. Bluebond-Langner, Mark-Bram Bouman, M. Bowers, Patricia Brassard, Jack L. Byrne, Luis Capitán, C. Cargill, Jeremi Carswell, S. Chang, Gaya Chelvakumar, Trevor Corneil, Katharine Baratz Dalke, Griet De Cuypere, Elma de Vries, Martin den Heijer, Aaron Devor, Cecilia Dhejne, A. D’Marco, E. Kale Edmiston, Laura Edwards-Leeper, R. Ehrbar, Diane Ehrensaft, Justus Eisfeld, Els Elaut, Laura Erickson-Schroth, Jamie L Feldman, Alessandra D. Fisher, M. M. Garcia, Luk Gijs, Susan E. Green, B. P. Hall, Teresa L. D. Hardy, Michael S. Irwig, Laura A. Jacobs, A. C. Janssen, Katherine Johnson, D. Klink, Bpc Kreukels, Laura E. Kuper, Elizabeth Kvach, Matthew A. Malouf, R Massey, T. Mazur, C McLachlan, Shane D. Morrison, Scott W. Mosser, Paula M. Neira, Ulrika Nygren, James Oates, Juno Obedin-Maliver, Georgios Pagkalos, Jessie Patton, Nittaya Phanuphak, Katherine Rachlin, Terry Reed, G. Nic Rider, J. Ristori, Sally Ann Robbins-Cherry, Stephanie A. Roberts, Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg, Susan Rosenthal, Kenny Sabir, Joshua D. Safer, Ayden I. Scheim, L. J. Seal, T. J. Sehoole, Katherine G. Spencer, Colton M St. Amand, Thomas D. Steensma, John Strang, Guy B. Taylor, Kinzie Tilleman, Guy T'Sjoen, L. Vála, Norah M. van Mello, Jaimie F. Veale, Jennifer A. Vencill, B. Vincent, Linda Wesp, Michael West, Jon Arcelus 
TL;DR: The SOC-8 guidelines are intended to be flexible to meet the diverse health care needs of TGD people globally and offer standards for promoting optimal health care and guidance for the treatment of people experiencing gender incongruence.
Abstract: Abstract Background: Transgender healthcare is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field. In the last decade, there has been an unprecedented increase in the number and visibility of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people seeking support and gender-affirming medical treatment in parallel with a significant rise in the scientific literature in this area. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) is an international, multidisciplinary, professional association whose mission is to promote evidence-based care, education, research, public policy, and respect in transgender health. One of the main functions of WPATH is to promote the highest standards of health care for TGD people through the Standards of Care (SOC). The SOC was initially developed in 1979 and the last version (SOC-7) was published in 2012. In view of the increasing scientific evidence, WPATH commissioned a new version of the Standards of Care, the SOC-8. Aim: The overall goal of SOC-8 is to provide health care professionals (HCPs) with clinical guidance to assist TGD people in accessing safe and effective pathways to achieving lasting personal comfort with their gendered selves with the aim of optimizing their overall physical health, psychological well-being, and self-fulfillment. Methods: The SOC-8 is based on the best available science and expert professional consensus in transgender health. International professionals and stakeholders were selected to serve on the SOC-8 committee. Recommendation statements were developed based on data derived from independent systematic literature reviews, where available, background reviews and expert opinions. Grading of recommendations was based on the available evidence supporting interventions, a discussion of risks and harms, as well as the feasibility and acceptability within different contexts and country settings. Results: A total of 18 chapters were developed as part of the SOC-8. They contain recommendations for health care professionals who provide care and treatment for TGD people. Each of the recommendations is followed by explanatory text with relevant references. General areas related to transgender health are covered in the chapters Terminology, Global Applicability, Population Estimates, and Education. The chapters developed for the diverse population of TGD people include Assessment of Adults, Adolescents, Children, Nonbinary, Eunuchs, and Intersex Individuals, and people living in Institutional Environments. Finally, the chapters related to gender-affirming treatment are Hormone Therapy, Surgery and Postoperative Care, Voice and Communication, Primary Care, Reproductive Health, Sexual Health, and Mental Health. Conclusions: The SOC-8 guidelines are intended to be flexible to meet the diverse health care needs of TGD people globally. While adaptable, they offer standards for promoting optimal health care and guidance for the treatment of people experiencing gender incongruence. As in all previous versions of the SOC, the criteria set forth in this document for gender-affirming medical interventions are clinical guidelines; individual health care professionals and programs may modify these in consultation with the TGD person.

272 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on the nonoverlapping, bimodal distribution of circulating testosterone concentration (measured by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry)—and making an allowance for women with mild hyperandrogenism, notably women with polycystic ovary syndrome)—the appropriate eligibility criterion for female athletic events should be a circulating testosterone of <5.0 nmol/L.
Abstract: Elite athletic competitions have separate male and female events due to men's physical advantages in strength, speed, and endurance so that a protected female category with objective entry criteria is required. Prior to puberty, there is no sex difference in circulating testosterone concentrations or athletic performance, but from puberty onward a clear sex difference in athletic performance emerges as circulating testosterone concentrations rise in men because testes produce 30 times more testosterone than before puberty with circulating testosterone exceeding 15-fold that of women at any age. There is a wide sex difference in circulating testosterone concentrations and a reproducible dose-response relationship between circulating testosterone and muscle mass and strength as well as circulating hemoglobin in both men and women. These dichotomies largely account for the sex differences in muscle mass and strength and circulating hemoglobin levels that result in at least an 8% to 12% ergogenic advantage in men. Suppression of elevated circulating testosterone of hyperandrogenic athletes results in negative effects on performance, which are reversed when suppression ceases. Based on the nonoverlapping, bimodal distribution of circulating testosterone concentration (measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry)-and making an allowance for women with mild hyperandrogenism, notably women with polycystic ovary syndrome (who are overrepresented in elite athletics)-the appropriate eligibility criterion for female athletic events should be a circulating testosterone of <5.0 nmol/L. This would include all women other than those with untreated hyperandrogenic disorders of sexual development and noncompliant male-to-female transgender as well as testosterone-treated female-to-male transgender or androgen dopers.

234 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Personal perspectives on how they became involved in the discovery and/or advancement of GPER research are presented, highlighting the roles of GP ER and GPER-selective compounds in diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cancer and the obligatory role of GPERN in propagating cardiovascular aging, arterial hypertension and heart failure through the stimulation of Nox expression.

162 citations


Cites background from "Estrogens and Androgens in Skeletal..."

  • ...They are also important in pathophysiology, playing an important role in breast cancer and protection from numerous diseases in premenopausal women [1-10]....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The current knowledge of sex steroid action on bone based on human and mouse studies is summarized, both agreements and potential discrepancies between these studies are identified, and directions for future research in this important area are suggested.
Abstract: Osteoporosis is a significant public health problem, and a major cause of the disease is estrogen deficiency following menopause in women. In addition, considerable evidence now shows that estrogen is also a major regulator of bone metabolism in men. Since the original description of the effects of estrogen deficiency on bone by Fuller Albright more than 70 years ago, there has been enormous progress in understanding the mechanisms of estrogen and testosterone action on bone using human and mouse models. Although we understand more about the effects of estrogen on bone as compared with testosterone, both sex steroids do play important roles, perhaps in a somewhat compartment-specific (i.e., cancellous vs. cortical bone) manner. This review summarizes our current knowledge of sex steroid action on bone based on human and mouse studies, identifies both agreements and potential discrepancies between these studies, and suggests directions for future research in this important area.

157 citations


Cites background from "Estrogens and Androgens in Skeletal..."

  • ...This compartment-specific effect of ERb deletion (i.e., an increase in cancellous but not cortical bone mass) is of interest, as previous studies in human (Bord et al. 2001) and mouse (Modder et al. 2004) bone have found that both ERa and ERb are expressed in cancellous bone, whereas cortical bone mainly contains ERa....

    [...]

  • ...The effects of estrogen on bone are mediated by two related, but distinct, receptors, ERa and ERb (Almeida et al. 2017)....

    [...]

  • ...However, testosterone likely does play an important role during growth and, directly or indirectly (via the growth hormone/insulinlike growth factor [IGF] system) (Almeida et al. 2017), contributes to the periosteal apposition that results in larger bones in men as compared with women....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
17 Jul 2002-JAMA
TL;DR: Overall health risks exceeded benefits from use of combined estrogen plus progestin for an average 5.2-year follow-up among healthy postmenopausal US women, and the results indicate that this regimen should not be initiated or continued for primary prevention of CHD.
Abstract: Context Despite decades of accumulated observational evidence, the balance of risks and benefits for hormone use in healthy postmenopausal women remains uncertain Objective To assess the major health benefits and risks of the most commonly used combined hormone preparation in the United States Design Estrogen plus progestin component of the Women's Health Initiative, a randomized controlled primary prevention trial (planned duration, 85 years) in which 16608 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years with an intact uterus at baseline were recruited by 40 US clinical centers in 1993-1998 Interventions Participants received conjugated equine estrogens, 0625 mg/d, plus medroxyprogesterone acetate, 25 mg/d, in 1 tablet (n = 8506) or placebo (n = 8102) Main outcomes measures The primary outcome was coronary heart disease (CHD) (nonfatal myocardial infarction and CHD death), with invasive breast cancer as the primary adverse outcome A global index summarizing the balance of risks and benefits included the 2 primary outcomes plus stroke, pulmonary embolism (PE), endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, hip fracture, and death due to other causes Results On May 31, 2002, after a mean of 52 years of follow-up, the data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping the trial of estrogen plus progestin vs placebo because the test statistic for invasive breast cancer exceeded the stopping boundary for this adverse effect and the global index statistic supported risks exceeding benefits This report includes data on the major clinical outcomes through April 30, 2002 Estimated hazard ratios (HRs) (nominal 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were as follows: CHD, 129 (102-163) with 286 cases; breast cancer, 126 (100-159) with 290 cases; stroke, 141 (107-185) with 212 cases; PE, 213 (139-325) with 101 cases; colorectal cancer, 063 (043-092) with 112 cases; endometrial cancer, 083 (047-147) with 47 cases; hip fracture, 066 (045-098) with 106 cases; and death due to other causes, 092 (074-114) with 331 cases Corresponding HRs (nominal 95% CIs) for composite outcomes were 122 (109-136) for total cardiovascular disease (arterial and venous disease), 103 (090-117) for total cancer, 076 (069-085) for combined fractures, 098 (082-118) for total mortality, and 115 (103-128) for the global index Absolute excess risks per 10 000 person-years attributable to estrogen plus progestin were 7 more CHD events, 8 more strokes, 8 more PEs, and 8 more invasive breast cancers, while absolute risk reductions per 10 000 person-years were 6 fewer colorectal cancers and 5 fewer hip fractures The absolute excess risk of events included in the global index was 19 per 10 000 person-years Conclusions Overall health risks exceeded benefits from use of combined estrogen plus progestin for an average 52-year follow-up among healthy postmenopausal US women All-cause mortality was not affected during the trial The risk-benefit profile found in this trial is not consistent with the requirements for a viable intervention for primary prevention of chronic diseases, and the results indicate that this regimen should not be initiated or continued for primary prevention of CHD

14,646 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It seems possible that one factor in aging may be related to deleterious side attacks of free radicals (which are normally produced in the course of cellular metabolism) on cell constituents.
Abstract: The phenomenon of growth, decline and death—aging—has been the source of considerable speculation (1, 8, 10). This cycle seems to be a more or less direct function of the metabolic rate and this in turn depends on the species (animal or plant) on which are superimposed the factors of heredity and the effects of the stresses and strains of life—which alter the metabolic activity. The universality of this phenomenon suggests that the reactions which cause it are basically the same in all living things. Viewing this process in the light of present day free radical and radiation chemistry and of radiobiology, it seems possible that one factor in aging may be related to deleterious side attacks of free radicals (which are normally produced in the course of cellular metabolism) on cell constituents.* Irradiation of living things induces mutation, cancer, and aging (9). Inasmuch as these also arise spontaneously in nature, it is natural to inquire if the processes might not be similar. It is believed that one mechanism of irradiation effect is through liberation of OH and HO 2 radicals (12). There is evidence, although indirect, that these two highly active free radicals are produced normally in living systems. In the first place, free radicals are present in living cells; this was recently demonstrated in vivo by a paramagnetic resonance absorption method (3). Further, it was shown that the concentration of free radicals increased with increasing metabolic activity in conformity with the postulates set forth some years ago that free radicals were involved in biologic oxidation-reduction reactions (11, 13). Are some of these free radicals OH and/or HO2, or radicals of a similar high order of reactivity, and where might they arise in the cell? The most likely source of OH and HO2 radicals, at least in the animal cell, would be the interaction of the respiratory enzymes involved

7,917 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
15 May 2003-Nature
TL;DR: Discovery of the RANK signalling pathway in the osteoclast has provided insight into the mechanisms of osteoporosis and activation of bone resorption, and how hormonal signals impact bone structure and mass.
Abstract: Osteoclasts are specialized cells derived from the monocyte/macrophage haematopoietic lineage that develop and adhere to bone matrix, then secrete acid and lytic enzymes that degrade it in a specialized, extracellular compartment. Discovery of the RANK signalling pathway in the osteoclast has provided insight into the mechanisms of osteoclastogenesis and activation of bone resorption, and how hormonal signals impact bone structure and mass. Further study of this pathway is providing the molecular basis for developing therapeutics to treat osteoporosis and other diseases of bone loss.

5,760 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
17 Apr 1998-Cell
TL;DR: The effects of OPGL are blocked in vitro and in vivo by OPG, suggesting that OPGl and OPG are key extracellular regulators of osteoclast development.

5,334 citations