scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference

01 Jun 1970-British Journal of Sociology-Vol. 21, Iss: 2, pp 231
About: This article is published in British Journal of Sociology.The article was published on 1970-06-01. It has received 4205 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Social organization & Ethnic group.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of recent anthropological perspectives on ethnic groups and their boundaries, emphasizing the role of state formation in their creation and maintenance, is presented in this paper, which discusses current questions facing archaeological research on these topics.
Abstract: It is often difficult to identify ethnic groups in the archaeological record, yet archaeology has much to contribute to understanding the long-term social and political dynamics of ethnicity. This review considers recent anthropological perspectives on ethnic groups and their boundaries, emphasizing the role of state formation in their creation and maintenance. It then reviews recent archaeological studies of ethnicity in complex societies and discusses current questions facing archaeological research on these topics.

238 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The new ecological anthropology as mentioned in this paper is located at the intersection of global, national, regional, and local systems, studying the outcome of the interaction of multiple levels and multiple factors, and it is otherwise attuned to the political aspects and implications of ecological processes.
Abstract: Older ecologies have been remiss in the narrowness of their spatial and temporal horizons, their functionalist assumptions, and their apolitical character. Suspending functionalist assumptions and an emphasis upon (homeo)stasis, “the new ecological anthropology” is located at the intersection of global, national, regional, and local systems, studying the outcome of the interaction of multiple levels and multiple factors. It blends theoretical and empirical research with applied, policy-directed, and critical work in what Rappaport called an “engaged” anthropology; and it is otherwise attuned to the political aspects and implications of ecological processes. Carefully laying out a critique of previous ecologies by way of announcing newer approaches, the article insists on the need to recognize the importance of culture mediations in ecological processes rather than treating culture as epiphenomenal and as a mere adaptive tool. It closes with a discussion of the methodologies appropriate to the new ecological anthropology. [“the new ecology,” political ecology, applied or engaged anthropology, linkages methodology]

234 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article found that relatively darker-skinned Latino immigrants experience skin-color-based discrimination in the realm of annual income, and that those who are most integrated into the United States are the most likely to opt out of the existing U.S. racial categorization scheme.
Abstract: How do Latino immigrants in the United States understand existing racial categories? And how does the existing U.S. racial order influence this understanding? Using data from the New Immigrant Survey (NIS), our analysis points to changes in how the U.S. racial order might operate in the future. We find that most Latino immigrants recognize the advantages of a White racial designation when asked to self-identify, but wider society is not often accepting of this White expansion. Our findings suggest that relatively darker-skinned Latino immigrants experience skin-color-based discrimination in the realm of annual income. Furthermore, Latinos who are most integrated into the United States are the most likely to opt out of the existing U.S. racial categorization scheme. We predict that a racial boundary is forming around some Latino immigrants: those with darker skin and those who have more experience in the U.S. racial stratification system.

227 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors provide an overview of foundational climate and culture studies in anthropology and track developments in this area to date to include anthropological engagements with contemporary global climate change, arguing that anthropologists need to adopt cross-scale, multistakeholder and interdisciplinary approaches in research and practice.
Abstract: This review provides an overview of foundational climate and culture studies in anthropology; it then tracks developments in this area to date to include anthropological engagements with contemporary global climate change. Although early climate and culture studies were mainly founded in archaeology and environmental anthropology, with the advent of climate change, anthropology's roles have expanded to engage local to global contexts. Considering both the unprecedented urgency and the new level of reflexivity that climate change ushers in, anthropologists need to adopt cross-scale, multistakeholder, and interdisciplinary approaches in research and practice. I argue for one mode that anthropologists should pursue—the development of critical collaborative, multisited ethnography, which I term “climate ethnography.”

225 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The study of politics in Africa has been extensively studied in the literature as discussed by the authors, with the focus on the economy of affection, gender, ethnicity, and the external dimension of Africa.
Abstract: Acknowledgements 1. The study of politics in Africa 2. The movement legacy 3. The problematic state 4. The economy of affection 5. Big man rule 6. The policy factor 7. The agrarian question 8. Gender and politics 9. Ethnicity and conflict 10. The external dimension 11. So what do we know? 12. Quo vadis Africa? References Index.

221 citations