Book•
Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity
01 Jan 1997-
TL;DR: The nature and expression of ethnicity: an anthropological view 3. The discursive dimension of ethnic identity 4. Ethnicity and genealogy: an Argolic case-study as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: 1. Phrasing the problem 2. The nature and expression of ethnicity: an anthropological view 3. The discursive dimension of ethnic identity 4. Ethnography and genealogy: an Argolic case-study 5. Ethnicity and archaeology 6. Ethnicity and linguistics 7. Conclusion.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: The psychology of intercultural adaptation was first discussed by Plato as discussed by the authors, and many modern enculturation theories claim that ethnic minorities (including aboriginal natives, immigrants, refugees, and soj...
Abstract: The psychology of intercultural adaptation was first discussed by Plato. Many modern enculturation theories claim that ethnic minorities (including aboriginal natives, immigrants, refugees, and soj...
826 citations
Cites background from "Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity"
...(Tacitus, 1909, p. 32) Indeed, the Greeks were ambivalent about foreigners and their influence on the customs of the nation (ethnos) and on the rationality of civic law (polis) (E. Cohen, 2000; J. M. Hall, 1997)....
[...]
Book•
01 Jan 2005TL;DR: Yoffee as discussed by the authors argues that early states were not uniformly constituted bureaucratic and regional entities, but had slaves and soldiers, priests and priestesses, peasants and prostitutes, merchants and craftsmen.
Abstract: In this ground-breaking work, Norman Yoffee shatters the prevailing myths underpinning our understanding of the evolution of early civilisations. He counters the emphasis in traditional scholarship on the rule of 'godly' and despotic male leaders and challenges the conventional view that early states were uniformly constituted bureaucratic and regional entities. Instead, by illuminating the role of slaves and soldiers, priests and priestesses, peasants and prostitutes, merchants and craftsmen, Yoffee depicts an evolutionary process centred on the concerns of everyday life. Drawing on evidence from ancient Mesopotamia, Egypt, China and Mesoamerica, the author explores the variety of trajectories followed by ancient states, from birth to collapse, and explores the social processes that shape any account of the human past. This book offers a bold new interpretation of social evolutionary theory, and as such it is essential reading for any student or scholar with an interest in the emergence of complex society.
314 citations
TL;DR: Yoffee as mentioned in this paper argues that the focus on the origins of the state has stifled rather than stimulated our understanding of early state development, and stresses the diversity of the early Mesopotamian state.
Abstract: For more than a century, archaeologists have frequently been drawn to understand the human past in broadly evolutionary terms, applying Darwinian thinking to the development of human societies. The unilinear models of human development that often result typically regard the state as the culmination of human progress, the end-point of a journey through intervening stages of bands, tribes and chiefdoms. Neo-evolutionary thinking was especially prevalent from the 1940s onwards, in the work of Julian Steward and others writing on the origins of the state. In the volume reviewed, Norman Yoffee challenges the former dominance of the neo-evolutionary approach, arguing that over the past half century it has stifled rather than stimulated our understanding of early state development.Yoffee contests the idea that states develop through a series of programmatic stages from less complex kinds of society. Instead, he stresses the diversity of the archaic state, drawing heavily on his specialist knowledge (drawn from texts as well as archaeology) of early Mesopotamia. Here we see city-state societies in which heterarchies play a role alongside hierarchies, and in which the varieties of lived experience varied considerably from place to place, even though all may at some level be considered to have been part of a shared Mesopotamian civilization.Yoffee's book is not, however, concerned solely with Mesopotamia; far from it, he draws comparative evidence from Egypt, South and East Asia and Central and South America to demonstrate the diversity and fluidity of the entities he is describing. Few of them conform to models that might be drawn from ethnography, and each state may in many ways be considered unique. Yet in a broader perspective, all states arise through a widespread pattern of change that has taken place in human society since the end of the Pleistocene in which individuals and groups have competed for control of resources.Yoffee concludes that ‘The central myth about the study of the earliest states ... is that there was something that could be called the archaic state, and that all of the earliest states were simply variations on this model’. The methodological alternative is to consider each society (of whatever type) as individual and unique, and constantly in a state of flux. In this review feature we invite a series of archaeologists specializing in the study of early states to address this and other issues raised by this important book. We begin, however, with an opening statement from the author himself.
264 citations
01 Dec 2016
248 citations
References
More filters
Book•
01 Jan 1992
68 citations
63 citations
Book•
01 May 1992TL;DR: In this article, the conceptualization of ethnicities is discussed in terms of metaphors, realities, and discourse in the context of political and social imagination and practice in the United Kingdom.
Abstract: Introduction Ethnicity Metaphors, Realities, Discourses PART ONE: THE TERRAIN OF IDEAS The Conceptualization of Ethnicity PART TWO: REALITIES The Myth of the Tribe The Poverty of Development PART THREE: THE POLITICAL TERRAIN The Tradition of Protest The Experience of Unity Social Imagination and Practice PART FOUR: THE DYNAMICS OF CULTURAL STRUGGLE Culture of Oppression and Culture of Protest Conclusion Ethnicity, Culture and the Anthropological Quest
61 citations
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the eablissement du sanctuaire d'Hera sur la limite orientale de la plaine d'Argolide a la periode Geometrique a servi a delimiter le territoire de la cite naissante d' Argos, and d'etablir la domination argienne sur l'Argolis, and revoie les temoins archeologiques, historiques, linguistiques, and mythologiques of l'Haraion.
Abstract: Il est generalement admis que l'etablissement du sanctuaire d'Hera sur la limite orientale de la plaine d'Argolide a la periode Geometrique a servi a delimiter le territoire de la cite naissante d'Argos, et d'etablir la domination argienne sur l'Argolide. Cet article revoie les temoins archeologiques, historiques, linguistiques et mythologiques de l'Heraion et de sa position dans la plaine, afin de demontrer que le territoire d'Argos ne couvrait pas l'enemble de la plaine, qu'il existait des differences culturelles entre l'est et l'ouest, et que l'Heraion est plus proche des traditions religieuses et culturelle de la partie est
59 citations