Open AccessBook
EU Law and the Harmonization of Takeovers in the Internal Market
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors present a legal base for the Harmonization of Company Law and Capital Markets Law on EU Level, as well as the Permissible Limits of Harmonization: Subsidiarity issues.Abstract:
Foreword. Acknowledgements. Preface. 1. The Fundamental Freedom of Establishment of Companies. 2. Legal Bases for the Harmonization of Company Law and Capital Markets Law on EU Level. 3. Aspects of EU Company Law Harmonization. 4. The Permissible Limits of Harmonization: Subsidiarity Issues. 5. Weaknesses and Difficulties in Harmonization Efforts in the Field of EU Company Law. 6. Establishing an Internal Market for Companies: Market Integration in the Area of EU Company Law. 7. The Relationship between the Treaty Provisions on Freedom of Establishment of Companies and Takeover Bids. 8. The Significance of the Corporate Mobility Case Law for the Takeover Process. 9. The EU Takeover Bid Directive: An EU Company Law Instrument with Strong Links to EU Capital Markets Law. 10. Market in Corporate Control: Essential Definitions. 11. An Overview of the Takeover Bid Directive in the Context of the Internal Market. 12. Direct Effect of the Fundamental Freedoms in EU Law. 13. Horizontality after Viking and Mangold. 14. The Extent to which Conduct of the Board and Articles in the Corporate Constitution Might Be Said to Constitute Restrictions on the Freedom of Establishment and on the Free Movement of Capital. 15. Conclusion. Bibliography. Appendix: Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on Takeover Bids (Text with EEA relevance).read more
Citations
More filters
DissertationDOI
Le gouvernement d'entreprise en droit européen et brésilien comparé
TL;DR: Notre et. al. as discussed by the authors analyse depasse le cœur du gouvernement d’entreprise et inclut des parties who relevent du droit des marches de capitaux and du des environnement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Varieties of Capitalism and the Limits of European Economic Integration
TL;DR: In this article, the authors consider European economic integration from the perspective of different types of capitalism and assess the likelihood of damage to the different models following the Lisbon Treaty, and argue descriptively that both types of markets can continue to coexist in the European Union, and normatively that it is vital that the integration project is managed in a way that does not fundamentally endanger them.
Journal ArticleDOI
Making sense of the legal and judicial architectures of regional trade agreements worldwide
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared 10 of the most established regional trade agreements in the world and document three types of responses to the challenge of regulatory misalignments among the member states.
The relationship between ownership structure and hostile takeovers in Sweden with an interntational perspective
Henrik Johnson,Daniel Josefsson +1 more
TL;DR: This presentation explains how mergers and acquisitions have been categorized by changes in the global economy and how changes in legislations have brought forward so called wave ...
Book ChapterDOI
Une vue outre-atlantique de la Cour et de sa jurisprudence
TL;DR: In this article, a vue of the Cour de justice of l'Union europeenne de l'autre cote de l’Atlantique is presented.