scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of electro-coagulation-flocculation for harvesting marine and freshwater microalgae.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Electro‐coagulation–flocculation (ECF) was shown to be more efficient using an aluminum anode than using an iron anode and is a particularly attractive method for harvesting marine microalgae because of the lower power consumption in seawater.
Abstract
Although microalgae are considered as a promising feedstock for biofuels, the energy efficiency of the production process needs to be significantly improved. Due to their small size and low concentration in the culture medium, cost-efficient harvesting of microalgae is a major challenge. In this study, the use of electro-coagulation–flocculation (ECF) as a method for harvesting a freshwater (Chlorella vulgaris) and a marine (Phaeodactylum tricornutum) microalgal species is evaluated. ECF was shown to be more efficient using an aluminum anode than using an iron anode. Furthermore, it could be concluded that the efficiency of the ECF process can be substantially improved by reducing the initial pH and by increasing the turbulence in the microalgal suspension. Although higher current densities resulted in a more rapid flocculation of the microalgal suspension, power consumption, expressed per kg of microalgae harvested, and release of aluminum were lower when a lower current density was used. The aluminum content of the harvested microalgal biomass was less than 1% while the aluminum concentration in the process water was below 2 mg L−1. Under optimal conditions, power consumption of the ECF process was around 2 kWh kg−1 of microalgal biomass harvested for Chlorella vulgaris and ca. 0.3 kWh kg−1 for Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Compared to centrifugation, ECF is thus more energy efficient. Because of the lower power consumption of ECF in seawater, ECF is a particularly attractive method for harvesting marine microalgae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011;108: 2320–2329. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citation
Vandamme D., Pontes SCV, Goiris K, Foubert I, Pinoy LJJ, Muylaert K.
Evaluation of electro-coagulation-flocculation for harvesting marine and
freshwater microalgae
Biotechnology and bioengineering, vol 108 (10), 2320-2329.
Archived version
Author manuscript: the content is identical to the content of the published
paper, but without the final typesetting by the publisher
Published version
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bit.23199/abstract
Journal homepage
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0290
Author contact
Dries.vandamme@kuleuven-kulak.be
your phone number + 32 (0)56 6041
IR
https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/306325
(article begins on next page)

Evaluation of electro-coagulation-flocculation for harvesting
marine and freshwater microalgae
Dries Vandamme
1*
, Sandra Cláudia Vieira Pontes
2
, Koen Goiris
3
, Imogen Foubert
1
, Luc Jozef
Jan Pinoy
2,4
, Koenraad Muylaert
1
.
1
Laboratory Aquatic Biology, K.U.Leuven Campus Kortrijk,
E. Sabbelaan 53,
8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
2
Department of Industrial Engineering, Laboratory for Chemical Process Technology, KaHo
St.-Lieven, Associated to K.U.Leuven, as Faculty of Industrial Sciences, Technologie
campus, Gebroeders Desmetstraat 1, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
3
Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M2S), Leuven Food Science and
Nutrition Research Centre (LFoRCe), Laboratory of Enzyme, Fermentation and Brewing
Technology, KaHo St.-Lieven, Associated to K.U.Leuven as Faculty of Industrial Sciences,
Technologie campus, Gebroeders Desmetstraat 1, B-9000 Gent, Belgium
4
Department of Chemical Engineering, K.U.Leuven, Willem de Croylaan 46, B-3001
Leuven, Belgium
*Corresponding author: Email: Dries.Vandamme@kuleuven-kortrijk.be
Tel: +32 56 246257
Fax: +32 56 246999
Keywords
coagulation / microalgae / dewatering / aluminum / electrodes / electrolytic flocculation
Running Title
Evaluation of ECF for harvesting microalgae

Abstract
Although microalgae are considered as a promising feedstock for biofuels, the energy
efficiency of the production process needs to be significantly improved. Due to their small
size and low concentration in the culture medium, cost efficient harvesting of microalgae is a
major challenge. In this study, the use of electro-coagulation-flocculation (ECF) as a method
for harvesting a freshwater (Chlorella vulgaris) and a marine (Phaeodactylum tricornutum)
microalgal species is evaluated. ECF was shown to be more efficient using an aluminum
anode than using an iron anode. Furthermore it could be concluded that the efficiency of the
ECF process can be substantially improved by reducing the initial pH and by increasing the
turbulence in the microalgal suspension. Although higher current densities resulted in a more
rapid flocculation of the microalgal suspension, power consumption, expressed per kg of
microalgae harvested, and release of aluminum were lower when a lower current density was
used. The aluminum content of the harvested microalgal biomass was less than 1 % while the
aluminum concentration in the process water was below 2 mg l
-1
. Under optimal conditions,
power consumption of the ECF process was around 2 kWh kg
-1
of microalgal biomass
harvested for Chlorella vulgaris and ca. 0.3 kWh kg
-1
for Phaeodactylum tricornutum.
Compared to centrifugation, ECF is thus more energy efficient. Because of the lower power
consumption of ECF in seawater, ECF is a particularly attractive method for harvesting
marine microalgae.

Introduction
Due to the combination of a high areal productivity, a high lipid content and limited
competition with food crops for arable land, microalgal biomass is an attractive feedstock for
the production of biofuels. At present, however, microalgae are only produced on a limited
scale for high-value products such as food supplements, natural pigments and poly-
unsaturated fatty acids (Cardozo et al., 2007; Raja et al., 2008; Spolaore et al., 2006). Energy
inputs during the production of microalgal biomass are very high and often exceed the energy
content of the microalgal biomass (Pienkos and Darzins, 2009; Wijffels and Barbosa, 2010).
To use microalgal biomass as a feedstock for biofuels, the cost and energy efficiency of the
process needs to be improved dramatically (Greenwell et al., 2010; Tredici, 2010).
Because of their small size (typically a few micrometer) and low concentration in the culture
medium (0.5 2 g/l), harvesting microalgal biomass is a major challenge. Most existing
microalgal production systems use energy intensive centrifuges to harvest microalgae
(Heasman et al., 2000). Consequently, harvesting represents a major fraction of the total
energy demand of the production process (Grima et al., 2003; Uduman et al., 2010). If the
microalgae could be preconcentrated 30-50 times by coagulation-flocculation and gravity
sedimentation prior to centrifugation, the energy demand for harvesting could be strongly
reduced (Harun et al., 2010; Tredici, 2010; Uduman et al., 2010).
Microalgae can easily be flocculated using metal coagulants such as Fe
3+
or Al
3+
salts (Ahmad
et al., 2006; Bernhardt and Clasen, 1991; Papazi et al., 2009). In wastewater treatment,
electro-coagulation-flocculation (ECF) has been proposed as an alternative for chemical
coagulants (Mollah et al., 2001; Mollah et al., 2004). In ECF, iron or aluminum ions are

released from a sacrificial anode through electrolytic oxidation. Compared to coagulation-
flocculation with Fe
3+
or Al
3+
salts, ECF has the advantage that no anions such as chlorine and
sulphate are introduced in the process water. The electrolytic oxidation of the sacrificial
anode, however, requires electricity.
During ECF, the following reactions occur at the anode:
Using an aluminum anode :
Al Al
3+
+ 3 e
-
x Al
3+
+ y OH
-
Al
x
(OH)
y
z+
The speciation of the aluminum hydroxides formed during ECF is highly variable and is
strongly influenced by pH (Mouedhen et al., 2008).
Using an iron anode :
Fe Fe
2+
+ 2 e
-
Fe
2+
+ 2 OH
-
Fe(OH)
2
or
Fe Fe
3+
+ 3 e
-
Fe
3+
+ 3 OH
-
Fe(OH)
3
It is not clear whether ferrous or ferric ions are formed during ECF (Sasson et al., 2009).
Moreover, Fe
2+
can be rapidly oxidized in solution to Fe
3+
in the presence of oxygen. Release
of Fe
2+
during ECF leads to green hydroxide precipitates, while Fe
3+
ions results in yellow
hydroxide precipitates.

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Dewatering of microalgal cultures : a major bottleneck to algae-based fuels

TL;DR: In this paper, various technologies currently used for dewatering microalgal cultures along with a comparative study of the performances of the different technologies are reviewed and compared, as well as a comparison of the performance of different technologies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Flocculation as a low-cost method for harvesting microalgae for bulk biomass production.

TL;DR: The challenges and possible solutions for flocculation are overviewed, which are seen as a promising low-cost harvesting method for flocculating microalgae.
Journal ArticleDOI

A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production

TL;DR: There appears to be no one method or combination of harvesting methods suited to all micro-algae and harvesting method will have a considerable influence on the design and operation of both upstream and downstream processes in an overall micro-algal biofuel production process.
Journal ArticleDOI

Integrated CO2 capture, wastewater treatment and biofuel production by microalgae culturing—A review

TL;DR: This article presents a critical review, focusing on various microalgae species that consume CO2 and nutrients from wastewater, and provide high quality biofuel.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methods of downstream processing for the production of biodiesel from microalgae

TL;DR: A substantial amount of previous work in microalgal harvesting and lipid extraction is surveyed to highlight recent progress in these areas and propose possible future directions for technological or process improvements that will directly affect the final production costs of microAlgal biomass-based biofuels.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Commercial applications of microalgae

TL;DR: The first use of microalgae by humans dates back 2000 years to the Chinese, who used Nostoc to survive during famine, while future research should focus on the improvement of production systems and the genetic modification of strains.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics

TL;DR: Economics of monoseptic production of microalgae in photobioreactors and the downstream recovery of metabolites are discussed using eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) recovery as a representative case study.
Journal ArticleDOI

An outlook on microalgal biofuels.

TL;DR: Although microalgae are not yet produced at large scale for bulk applications, recent advances—particularly in the methods of systems biology, genetic engineering, and biorefining—present opportunities to develop this process in a sustainable and economical way within the next 10 to 15 years.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts

TL;DR: In this paper, a detailed understanding of the sweep flocculation mechanism is provided, especially with regard to the role of charge neutralization and hydroxide precipitation. But the results can be reasonably well explained in terms of established ideas, and there are also some uncertainties regarding the action of pre-hydrolysed coagulants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Electrocoagulation (EC)--science and applications.

TL;DR: The objective of this review through a survey of the literature is to bring the chemistry and physical processes involved into perspective and to focus attention on those areas critically needing research.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Evaluation of electro-coagulation-flocculation for harvesting marine and freshwater microalgae" ?

In this study, the use of electro-coagulation-flocculation ( ECF ) as a method for harvesting a freshwater ( Chlorella vulgaris ) and a marine ( Phaeodactylum tricornutum ) microalgal species is evaluated. Furthermore it could be concluded that the efficiency of the ECF process can be substantially improved by reducing the initial pH and by increasing the turbulence in the microalgal suspension. 

To reach an a of 95% for Chlorella vulgaris, 50 min ECF was required using 1.5 mA cm -2 , while only 10 min ECF was required using 12 mA cm -2 . 

Because of the lower power consumption of ECF in seawater, ECF is a particularly attractive method for harvesting marine microalgae. 

It is relevant to evaluate the use of ECF as a harvesting method for marine microalgae because marine microalgae are attractive as a source of biofuels due to their limited dependence on freshwater resources. 

Stirring improves the recovery efficiency by enhancing contact rates between the coagulants and the microalgal cells (Mollah et al., 2004). 

Because of their small size (typically a few micrometer) and low concentration in the culture medium (0.5 – 2 g/l), harvesting microalgal biomass is a major challenge. 

Phaeodactylum tricornutum was cultured in WC medium prepared in deionised water to which 30 g L -1 synthetic sea salt (Homarsel, Zoutman, Belgium) was added. 

As electricity is the driving force for the reactions occurring at the anode, current density is an important variable in the ECF process (Fig. 2). 

Magnesium concentrations in the biomass did not increase during the experiment, most likely because magnesium was precipitated on the cathode. 

In their study on the use of ECF for removal of microalgae from eutrophic surface waters, Goa et al. (2010a) also noted that a low pH had a positive effect on the recovery efficiency of microalgae during ECF. 

Due to their small size and low concentration in the culture medium, cost efficient harvesting of microalgae is a major challenge. 

To avoid accumulation of excess aluminum in either the liquid phase, the biomass or both, ECFshould not be continued beyond the point where a reaches the saturation phase. 

Both in the marine and the freshwater medium, it is clear that the aluminum content in both the water and the microalgal biomass can be minimized by using a lower current density. 

Because the time needed to achieve a maximal a was shortest for a stirring speed of 150 rpm, this stirring speed was used in subsequent experiments. 

These analyses clearly indicated that the minimal power consumption per unit of microalgal biomass recovered is much lower if lower current densities are used than when higher current densities are used. 

These sulphate anions are known to facilitate precipitation of aluminum hydroxides (Duan and Gregory, 2003; Gregory and Duan, 2001).