scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Exercise and Sports Science Australia (ESSA) position statement on exercise prescription for the prevention and management of osteoporosis

TL;DR: Evidence from animal and human trials indicates that bone responds positively to impact activities and high intensity progressive resistance training, and the optimisation of muscle strength, balance and mobility minimises the risk of falls.
About: This article is published in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport.The article was published on 2017-05-01 and is currently open access. It has received 208 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Exercise prescription & Osteoporosis.

Summary (2 min read)

Introduction

  • Osteoporotic fractures are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, also known as Objective.
  • The aim of the current position statement is to provide health practitioners with specific, evidence-based guidelines for safe and effective exercise prescription for the prevention or management of osteoporosis, accommodating a range of potential comorbidities.
  • Evidence from animal and human trials indicates that bone responds positively to impact activities and high intensity progressive resistance training, also known as Results.
  • It is important that all exercise programs be accompanied by sufficient calcium and vitamin D, and address issues of comorbidity and safety.
  • Loaded spine flexion is not recommended, and impact activities may require modification in the presence of osteoarthritis or frailty.

Background

  • According to the WHO, a DXAderived BMD T-score (standard deviation, SD) of 2.5 or more below the mean for young adult Caucasian women constitutes a diagnosis of osteoporosis.
  • While the precise dose of exercise to promote positive skeletal adaptations throughout life remains to be determined, current evidence indicates that the effects of exercise on bone are modality-, dose- and intensity-dependent.
  • The goal of the current position statement is to provide specific exercise recommendations for the prevention and/or management of osteoporosis and fragility/low trauma fractures, within the limits of existing evidence.
  • In older women, the skeletal response to high impact activities is less consistent, with some but not all trials reporting positive effects 45, 46 .
  • Human data are confounded by an inability to control many variables that exert profound influence on bone; including genes, certain diseases, medications, diet and exercise history.

Exercise prescription – Recommendations (Summarised in Table 1)

  • An exercise program of moderate to high-impact weight-bearing activities, high intensity PRT and balance training forms the basis of the current recommendations.
  • While frail individuals would theoretically benefit from a similar program of osteogenic exercise, limitations in clinical or functional capacity may necessitate a more conservative approach, with a particular focus on optimising muscle function and enhancing balance to reduce the risk of falling 13, 53 .
  • Thus, an exercise prescription should take account of an individual’s BMD and functional and clinical risk factors for falls and fracture.
  • For some, a period of moderate advancing to high-intensity PRT may also be required to condition the musculoskeletal system before introducing impact exercises.
  • The authors define “high risk” of low trauma fracture as having osteoporosis (T- score less than -2.5 SD), previous fracture, and/or multiple risk factors for fracture.

Special considerations

  • Individuals with the lowest bone mass and/or the lowest levels of previous exercise exposure are likely to exhibit the greatest response to increased exercise loading 71 .
  • Increasing muscle strength and balance will reduce fall risk and are therefore recommended for such individuals.
  • Table 2 provides specific modifications to exercise recommendations for persons with common comorbidities, including osteoarthritis, frailty/neuromuscular impairment, and/or cardiopulmonary disease.
  • The clinical community has traditionally discouraged repetitive impact exercise for individuals with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA).
  • A recent study has shown that progressive high impact exercise training can benefit bone without adversely affecting knee joint cartilage of mildly osteoarthritic postmenopausal women 72 .

Contraindications to exercise

  • As with any exercise recommendation, certain caveats apply.
  • Individuals with known vertebral osteoporosis/kyphosis should avoid deep forward flexion activities, particularly when lifting a load or carrying an object (e.g. rowing, lifting weights with a flexed spine, yoga, Pilates, bowling, sit-ups, house and yard work), in order to avoid vertebral wedge fractures.
  • High-risk individuals should receive training in safe lifting and postural techniques to avoid dangerous or excessive loading during common daily tasks or recreational activities.
  • Exercise prescription for individuals with pain, kyphosis and/or poor balance must be individualised and supervised.
  • Finally, exercise recommendations for the prevention or management of osteoporosis must be undertaken within the boundaries of exercise restrictions for comorbid conditions.

Gaps in the literature

  • There are two main gaps in the literature.
  • It is not possible to provide definitive guidelines for the precise amount, intensity and duration of every exercise that will stimulate optimal gains in bone for every individual.
  • It has been estimated that to power the definitive exercise intervention trial for a hip fracture endpoint in women, a sample size of over 7000 individuals at high risk of low trauma fracture would be required, which would take many years to recruit at a prohibitive financial cost 76 .
  • The number would be far greater for a sample of men.
  • Nevertheless, insufficient direct experimental evidence limits the ability to draw definitive conclusions with regards to the influence of exercise on fracture incidence.

Summary

  • For the healthy individual whose goal is to prevent osteoporosis, lifelong exercise including regular, brief, weight-bearing, high-impact exercise and high intensity PRT is recommended.
  • Adequate calcium and vitamin D will complement exercise programs for musculoskeletal health and function.
  • For the high-risk individual with established osteoporosis and increased risk of fracture, falls prevention programs with a focus on balance and mobility training and high intensity PRT are essential.
  • Ongoing supervision is required for individuals at high risk of low trauma fracture and those unaccustomed to high intensity exercise.
  • Correct technique, particularly for exercises loading the spine, is imperative to avoid increasing the risk of vertebral fracture.

Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Evidence is provided to support recommendations for successful resistance training in older adults related to 4 parts: program design variables, physiological adaptations, functional benefits, and considerations for frailty, sarcopenia, and other chronic conditions.
Abstract: Fragala, MS, Cadore, EL, Dorgo, S, Izquierdo, M, Kraemer, WJ, Peterson, MD, and Ryan, ED. Resistance training for older adults: position statement from the national strength and conditioning association. J Strength Cond Res 33(8): 2019-2052, 2019-Aging, even in the absence of chronic disease, is associated with a variety of biological changes that can contribute to decreases in skeletal muscle mass, strength, and function. Such losses decrease physiologic resilience and increase vulnerability to catastrophic events. As such, strategies for both prevention and treatment are necessary for the health and well-being of older adults. The purpose of this Position Statement is to provide an overview of the current and relevant literature and provide evidence-based recommendations for resistance training for older adults. As presented in this Position Statement, current research has demonstrated that countering muscle disuse through resistance training is a powerful intervention to combat the loss of muscle strength and muscle mass, physiological vulnerability, and their debilitating consequences on physical functioning, mobility, independence, chronic disease management, psychological well-being, quality of life, and healthy life expectancy. This Position Statement provides evidence to support recommendations for successful resistance training in older adults related to 4 parts: (a) program design variables, (b) physiological adaptations, (c) functional benefits, and (d) considerations for frailty, sarcopenia, and other chronic conditions. The goal of this Position Statement is to a) help foster a more unified and holistic approach to resistance training for older adults, b) promote the health and functional benefits of resistance training for older adults, and c) prevent or minimize fears and other barriers to implementation of resistance training programs for older adults.

505 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is proposed that physical inactivity could be considered a behavior selected by evolution for resting, and also selected to be reinforcing in life-threatening situations in which exercise would be dangerous.
Abstract: This review proposes that physical inactivity could be considered a behavior selected by evolution for resting, and also selected to be reinforcing in life-threatening situations in which exercise would be dangerous. Underlying the notion are human twin studies and animal selective breeding studies, both of which provide indirect evidence for the existence of genes for physical inactivity. Approximately 86% of the 325 million in the United States (U.S.) population achieve less than the U.S. Government and World Health Organization guidelines for daily physical activity for health. Although underappreciated, physical inactivity is an actual contributing cause to at least 35 unhealthy conditions, including the majority of the 10 leading causes of death in the U.S. First, we introduce nine physical inactivity-related themes. Next, characteristics and models of physical inactivity are presented. Following next are individual examples of phenotypes, organ systems, and diseases that are impacted by physical inactivity, including behavior, central nervous system, cardiorespiratory fitness, metabolism, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, bone, immunity, digestion, and cancer. Importantly, physical inactivity, itself, often plays an independent role as a direct cause of speeding the losses of cardiovascular and strength fitness, shortening of healthspan, and lowering of the age for the onset of the first chronic disease, which in turn decreases quality of life, increases health care costs, and accelerates mortality risk.

408 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There is no set prescription and total weekly dosage that would be considered evidence-based for all cancer patients, so targeted exercise prescription is needed to ensure greatest benefit in the short and longer term, with low risk of harm.

253 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide evidence-based rationale for using exercise and physical activity (PA) for health promotion and disease prevention and treatment in older adults, and discuss the specific modalities and doses that have been studied in randomised controlled trials for their effectiveness in attenuating physiological changes of ageing, disease prevention, and/or improvement of older adults with chronic disease and disability.
Abstract: The human ageing process is universal, ubiquitous and inevitable. Every physiological function is being continuously diminished. There is a range between two distinct phenotypes of ageing, shaped by patterns of living - experiences and behaviours, and in particular by the presence or absence of physical activity (PA) and structured exercise (i.e., a sedentary lifestyle). Ageing and a sedentary lifestyle are associated with declines in muscle function and cardiorespiratory fitness, resulting in an impaired capacity to perform daily activities and maintain independent functioning. However, in the presence of adequate exercise/PA these changes in muscular and aerobic capacity with age are substantially attenuated. Additionally, both structured exercise and overall PA play important roles as preventive strategies for many chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes, osteoporosis, and obesity; improvement of mobility, mental health, and quality of life; and reduction in mortality, among other benefits. Notably, exercise intervention programmes improve the hallmarks of frailty (low body mass, strength, mobility, PA level, energy) and cognition, thus optimising functional capacity during ageing. In these pathological conditions exercise is used as a therapeutic agent and follows the precepts of identifying the cause of a disease and then using an agent in an evidence-based dose to eliminate or moderate the disease. Prescription of PA/structured exercise should therefore be based on the intended outcome (e.g., primary prevention, improvement in fitness or functional status or disease treatment), and individualised, adjusted and controlled like any other medical treatment. In addition, in line with other therapeutic agents, exercise shows a dose-response effect and can be individualised using different modalities, volumes and/or intensities as appropriate to the health state or medical condition. Importantly, exercise therapy is often directed at several physiological systems simultaneously, rather than targeted to a single outcome as is generally the case with pharmacological approaches to disease management. There are diseases for which exercise is an alternative to pharmacological treatment (such as depression), thus contributing to the goal of deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMS). There are other conditions where no effective drug therapy is currently available (such as sarcopenia or dementia), where it may serve a primary role in prevention and treatment. Therefore, this consensus statement provides an evidence-based rationale for using exercise and PA for health promotion and disease prevention and treatment in older adults. Exercise prescription is discussed in terms of the specific modalities and doses that have been studied in randomised controlled trials for their effectiveness in attenuating physiological changes of ageing, disease prevention, and/or improvement of older adults with chronic disease and disability. Recommendations are proposed to bridge gaps in the current literature and to optimise the use of exercise/PA both as a preventative medicine and as a therapeutic agent.

218 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Guidance is provided in an international setting on the assessment and specific treatment of postmenopausal women at low, high and very high risk of fragility fractures as mentioned in this paper, taking additional account of further categorisation of increased risk of fracture.
Abstract: Guidance is provided in an international setting on the assessment and specific treatment of postmenopausal women at low, high and very high risk of fragility fractures. The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2019. This manuscript seeks to apply this in an international setting, taking additional account of further categorisation of increased risk of fracture, which may inform choice of therapeutic approach. Clinical perspective and updated literature search. The following areas are reviewed: categorisation of fracture risk and general pharmacological management of osteoporosis. A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use to characterise fracture risk and direct interventions.

190 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
18 May 1996-BMJ
TL;DR: Measurements of bone mineral density can predict fracture risk but cannot identify individuals who will have a fracture, and a programme of screening menopausal women for osteoporosis by measuring bone density cannot be recommended.
Abstract: Objective: To determine the ability of measurements of bone density in women to predict later fractures. Design: Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies published between 1985 and end of 1994 with a baseline measurement of bone density in women and subsequent follow up for fractures. For comparative purposes, we also reviewed case control studies of hip fractures published between 1990 and 1994. Subjects: Eleven separate study populations with about 90000 person years of observation time and over 2000 fractures. Main outcome measures: Relative risk of fracture for a decrease in bone mineral density of one standard deviation below age adjusted mean. Results: All measuring sites had similar predictive abilities (relative risk 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 1.6)) for decrease in bone mineral density except for measurement at spine for predicting vertebral fractures (relative risk 2.3 (1.9 to 2.8)) and measurement at hip for hip fractures (2.6 (2.0 to 3.5)). These results are in accordance with results of case-control studies. Predictive ability of decrease in bone mass was roughly similar to (or, for hip or spine measurements, better than) that of a 1 SD increase in blood pressure for stroke and better than a 1 SD increase in serum cholesterol concentration for cardiovascular disease. Conclusions: Measurements of bone mineral density can predict fracture risk but cannot identify individuals who will have a fracture. We do not recommend a programme of screening menopausal women for osteoporosis by measuring bone density. Key messages Measuring bone mineral density has been suggested as a method of identifying individuals at high risk of fracture in a preventive context Our meta-analysis of prospective studies showed that all studies measuring bone density at any site had similar predictive ability for a decrease of 1 SD in bone density except for measurements at hip and spine, which have better predictive ability for fractures in hip and spine respectively Predictive ability of decrease in bone mass was roughly similar to (or, for hip or spine measurements, better than) that of a 1 SD increase in blood pressure for stroke and better than a 1 SD increase in serum cholesterol concentration for cardiovascular disease Although bone mineral density measurements can predict fracture risk, they cannot identify individuals who will have a fracture, and a screening programme for osteoporosis cannot be recommended

3,466 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: These interventions were more effective in people at higher risk of falling, including those with severe visual impairment, and home safety interventions appear to be more effective when delivered by an occupational therapist.
Abstract: As people get older, they may fall more often for a variety of reasons including problems with balance, poor vision, and dementia. Up to 30% may fall in a year. Although one in five falls may require medical attention, less than one in 10 results in a fracture. This review looked at the healthcare literature to establish which fall prevention interventions are effective for older people living in the community, and included 159 randomised controlled trials with 79,193 participants. Group and home-based exercise programmes, usually containing some balance and strength training exercises, effectively reduced falls, as did Tai Chi. Overall, exercise programmes aimed at reducing falls appear to reduce fractures. Multifactorial interventions assess an individual's risk of falling, and then carry out treatment or arrange referrals to reduce the identified risks. Overall, current evidence shows that this type of intervention reduces the number of falls in older people living in the community but not the number of people falling during follow-up. These are complex interventions, and their effectiveness may be dependent on factors yet to be determined. Interventions to improve home safety appear to be effective, especially in people at higher risk of falling and when carried out by occupational therapists. An anti-slip shoe device worn in icy conditions can also reduce falls. Taking vitamin D supplements does not appear to reduce falls in most community-dwelling older people, but may do so in those who have lower vitamin D levels in the blood before treatment. Some medications increase the risk of falling. Three trials in this review failed to reduce the number of falls by reviewing and adjusting medications. A fourth trial involving family physicians and their patients in medication review was effective in reducing falls. Gradual withdrawal of a particular type of drug for improving sleep, reducing anxiety, and treating depression (psychotropic medication) has been shown to reduce falls. Cataract surgery reduces falls in women having the operation on the first affected eye. Insertion of a pacemaker can reduce falls in people with frequent falls associated with carotid sinus hypersensitivity, a condition which causes sudden changes in heart rate and blood pressure. In people with disabling foot pain, the addition of footwear assessment, customised insoles, and foot and ankle exercises to regular podiatry reduced the number of falls but not the number of people falling. The evidence relating to the provision of educational materials alone for preventing falls is inconclusive.

3,124 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The combination of frequency, intensity, and duration of exercise is found to be the most important factor in determining the intensity and quality of exercise a person receives.
Abstract: SUMMARYACSM Position Stand on The Recommended Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness, and Flexibility in Adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 975-991, 1998. The combination of frequency, intensity, and duration of chr

3,095 citations

01 Jan 1994
TL;DR: There is little evidence that osteoporosis can usefully be tackled by a public health policy to influence risk factors such as smoking, exercise and nutrition, so the selective use of screening techniques will improve the cost-benefit ratio of intervention.

3,008 citations

Frequently Asked Questions (16)
Q1. What are the main causes of falls?

As falls are a major cause of fracture, gait, balance, mobility, transfer ability, range of motion, muscle strength (particularly of the trunk, elbow, hip and knee extensors) and vision should also be considered. 

Progressively challenging balance, posture and mobility exercises should be a greater focus than for low-risk individuals, to prevent falls. 

As kyphotic posture is associated with impaired balance in the elderly with osteoporosis 57 , back extension exercise may indirectly reduce falls risk. 

In light of the strong association between falls and osteoporotic fractures, any exercise programdesigned to prevent fractures in the elderly, particularly those with known risk factors for falling, should include activities to optimise muscle function, balance and gait stability. 

As bone is a dynamic tissue with the capacity to adapt to changing load requirements, exercise iswidely recognised as a vital physical stimulus for the development and maintenance of optimal bone strength throughout life. 

It has been estimated that to power the definitive exercise intervention trial for a hip fracture endpoint in women, a sample size of over 7000 individuals at high risk of low trauma fracture would be required, which would take many years to recruit at a prohibitive financial cost 76 . 

Osteoporotic fracture can occur at virtually any skeletal site; however, the bones most frequently affected are the spine, hip, wrist, humerus and pelvis. 

Some exercise programs that have combined both high intensity PRT and moderate-to-high impact activities such as running, jumping, skipping and high impact aerobics have improved multiple musculoskeletal outcomes for both older women and men, including BMD, and muscle mass, strength and function 48, 49 . 

Many trials have reported relatively modest benefits of exercise to BMD in adulthood - preventing loss or promoting gains in the order of only 1-3% following exerciseinterventions of between 24 and 104 weeks 32 . 

RCTs and meta-analyses indicate that exercise training involving certain forms of weight-bearing impact exercise, such as hopping and jumping, and/or progressive resistance training (PRT), alone or in combination (multi-modal programs), can improve the bone health of children and adolescents 28 , pre29 and postmenopausal women 30 , and older men 31 . 

Individuals with known vertebralosteoporosis/kyphosis should avoid deep forward flexion activities, particularly when lifting a load or carrying an object (e.g. rowing, lifting weights with a flexed spine, yoga, Pilates, bowling, sit-ups, house and yard work), in order to avoid vertebral wedge fractures. 

high-impact activities and exercises that require rapid and/or loaded twisting, and explosive or abrupt actions (e.g., golf, racquet sports) may be contraindicated for some individuals at high risk of low trauma fracture, particularly those with vertebral osteoporosis, poor balance, or osteoarthritis. 

There is also evidence that the inclusion of walking in an exercise program can expose previously sedentary or frail older adults to an increased risk of falling, thereby increasing the risk of fracture 13 . 

More feasible activities to optimise bone health at different stages of life have been examined in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) designed to employ the principles of optimal loading from animal studies. 

In most cases, falls prevention programs that are focused on balance and mobility, including Tai Chi or the well-known Otago Home Exercise Program, do not induce the necessary bone strain to stimulate adaptive skeletal benefits in older people 51, 52 , but may play a vital role in neuromuscular conditioning 53 . 

Relatively few impacts (10-50/day, 3 times/week) 42 are required to stimulate the response in premenopausal women, but added benefit may be derived from more frequent exposure (4-7 days/week) 43 .