scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Book

Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen

About: The article was published on 2010-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 664 citations till now.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore and discuss the possibilities of applying qualitative content analysis as a (text) interpretation method in case study research, and argue in favor of both case-study research as a research strategy and qualitative content analyses as a method of examination of data material.
Abstract: This paper aims at exploring and discussing the possibilities of applying qualitative content analysis as a (text) interpretation method in case study research. First, case study research as a research strategy within qualitative social research is briefly presented. Then, a basic introduction to (qualitative) content analysis as an interpretation method for qualitative interviews and other data material is given. Finally the use of qualitative content analysis for developing case studies is examined and evaluated. The author argues in favor of both case study research as a research strategy and qualitative content analysis as a method of examination of data material and seeks to encourage the integration of qualitative content analysis into the data analysis in case study research.

1,017 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explore the utilization of two methods, namely coding and qualitative content analysis, for the first steps in the data analysis process, namely "cleaning" and organizing qualitative data.
Abstract: Qualitative research aimed at "mechanismic" explanations poses specific challenges to qualitative data analysis because it must integrate existing theory with patterns identified in the data. We explore the utilization of two methods—coding and qualitative content analysis—for the first steps in the data analysis process, namely "cleaning" and organizing qualitative data. Both methods produce an information base that is structured by categories and can be used in the subsequent search for patterns in the data and integration of these patterns into a systematic, theoretically embedded explanation. Used as a stand-alone method outside the grounded theory approach, coding leads to an indexed text, i.e. both the original text and the index (the system of codes describing the content of text segments) are subjected to further analysis. Qualitative content analysis extracts the relevant information, i.e. separates it from the original text, and processes only this information. We suggest that qualitative content analysis has advantages compared to coding whenever the research question is embedded in prior theory and can be answered without processing knowledge about the form of statements and their position in the text, which usually is the case in the search for "mechanismic" explanations. Coding outperforms qualitative content analysis in research that needs this information in later stages of the analysis, e.g. the exploration of meaning or the study of the construction of narratives.

402 citations


Cites background or methods from "Experteninterviews und qualitative ..."

  • ...…is to work with a system of categories that is derived from theoretical consideration but can be changed and extended during the whole process of data analysis in a way that enables the preservation of theoretical considerations without forcing them onto the data (GLÄSER & LAUDEL, 2010 [2004])....

    [...]

  • ...Our own approach (GLÄSER & LAUDEL, 2010 [2004]) does not aim at constructing a final version of a set of categories that remains unchanged when applied to the texts....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It can be concluded that as a result of a ‘market failure’ of the university system, the transition from dependent to independent research is currently being relocated to a phase between the PhD and the first academic position.
Abstract: While the studies of Early Career Researchers (ECRs) have contributed politically important insights into factors hindering ECRs, they have not yet achieved a theoretical understanding of the causal mechanisms that are at work in the transition from dependent to independent research. This paper positions the early career phase in a theoretical framework that combines approaches from the sociology of science and organisational sociology and emphasises the transitional process. In this framework, the early career phase is considered as containing a status passage from the apprentice to the colleague state of their career in their scientific communities. In order to capture the mechanisms underlying this transition, it is important to analyse the interactions of these careers as they unfold over time. The usefulness of this approach is demonstrated with a pilot study of Australian ECRs. We show (a) that misalignments of the three careers stretch the transition phase; (b) that the two major factors affecting the transition are a successful PhD and a research-intensive phase prior to normal academic employment; and (c) that the most important condition hindering the transition is the lack of time for research. It can be concluded that as a result of a ‘market failure’ of the university system, the transition from dependent to independent research is currently being relocated to a phase between the PhD and the first academic position.

267 citations


Cites methods from "Experteninterviews und qualitative ..."

  • ...Data analysis The interviews were tape-recorded, fully transcribed and analysed using a method of qualitative content analysis (Gläser and Laudel 2006)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A comparative interview-based study of experimental physicists working at Australian and German universities found that strategies differ between scientists in the two countries because of different funding conditions; and they differ between top scientists and others.
Abstract: Shrinking university budgets make university researchers more and more dependent on external funds. As a response, they develop specific strategies for selecting external funds and for adapting their research. In a comparative interview-based study of experimental physicists working at Australian and German universities, connections between their funding conditions and adaptation strategies were analysed. Strategies differ between scientists in the two countries because of different funding conditions; and they differ between top scientists and others. The adaptation affects the content of research, for instance, its quality and innovativeness. The findings can be generalised to resource-intensive fields that underwent a shift from recurrent to external funding. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

230 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the current state-of-the-art for lifetime extension of onshore wind turbines in Germany, Spain, Denmark, and the UK through a literature review and 24 guideline-based interviews with key market players.
Abstract: A significant number of wind turbines will reach the end of their planned service life in the near future. A decision on lifetime extension is complex and experiences to date are limited. This review presents the current state-of-the-art for lifetime extension of onshore wind turbines in Germany, Spain, Denmark, and the UK. Information was gathered through a literature review and 24 guideline-based interviews with key market players. Technical, economic and legal aspects are discussed. Results indicate that end-of-life solutions will develop a significant market over the next five years. The application of updated load simulation and inspections for technical lifetime extension assessment differs between countries. A major concern is the uncertainty about future electricity spot market prices, which determine if lifetime extension is economically feasible.

222 citations