Explaining Dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
482 citations
59 citations
41 citations
Cites background from "Explaining Dissent on the Supreme C..."
...…et al. (1997) and Eisenberg et al. (2011) for the case of Israel, Henderson (2007) for the case of the U.S. Supreme Court, Eisenberg and Miller (2009) for U.S. state supreme courts, Smyth and Narayan (2004) for the Australian High Court, and Songer et al. (2011) for the Canadian Supreme Court....
[...]
...9On Canada, see Tate and Sittiwong (1989), Alarie and Green (2008), Green and Alarie (2009), and Songer et al. (2011)....
[...]
25 citations
21 citations
Cites background from "Explaining Dissent on the Supreme C..."
...In Poland, the nominations to the Court are exclusively vested 3 On Canada, see Tate and Sittiwong (1989), Alarie and Green (2008), Green and Alarie (2009), and Songer et al. (2011)....
[...]
References
11 citations
9 citations
"Explaining Dissent on the Supreme C..." refers background in this paper
...In particular, state courts with diversity in the political party background of their judges were found to have higher rates of dissent than states whose judges shared a common party background ~Jaros and Canon, 1971; Patterson and Rathjen, 1976!....
[...]
8 citations
"Explaining Dissent on the Supreme C..." refers background in this paper
...Known to many as the “Great Dissenter,” in an analysis of opinion writing patterns during the Lamer Court, L’Heureux-Dubé was found to have authored dissenting opinions at a rate of 61 per cent ~Ostberg et al., 2004!....
[...]
7 citations