Explaining Dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada
Citations
482 citations
59 citations
41 citations
Cites background from "Explaining Dissent on the Supreme C..."
...…et al. (1997) and Eisenberg et al. (2011) for the case of Israel, Henderson (2007) for the case of the U.S. Supreme Court, Eisenberg and Miller (2009) for U.S. state supreme courts, Smyth and Narayan (2004) for the Australian High Court, and Songer et al. (2011) for the Canadian Supreme Court....
[...]
...9On Canada, see Tate and Sittiwong (1989), Alarie and Green (2008), Green and Alarie (2009), and Songer et al. (2011)....
[...]
25 citations
21 citations
Cites background from "Explaining Dissent on the Supreme C..."
...In Poland, the nominations to the Court are exclusively vested 3 On Canada, see Tate and Sittiwong (1989), Alarie and Green (2008), Green and Alarie (2009), and Songer et al. (2011)....
[...]
References
45 citations
44 citations
39 citations
"Explaining Dissent on the Supreme C..." refers result in this paper
...This conclusion is particularly strong in studies of the US Supreme Court; both the most vocal advocates of the attitudinal model ~see Brenner and Spaeth, 1988; Segal and Spaeth, 2002! as well as scholars usually associated with strategic approaches to decision making ~such as Maltzman et al.,…...
[...]
37 citations
36 citations