Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective
TL;DR: Wang et al. as discussed by the authors presented a comprehensive review of detecting fake news on social media, including fake news characterizations on psychology and social theories, existing algorithms from a data mining perspective, evaluation metrics and representative datasets.
Abstract: Social media for news consumption is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, its low cost, easy access, and rapid dissemination of information lead people to seek out and consume news from social media. On the other hand, it enables the wide spread of \fake news", i.e., low quality news with intentionally false information. The extensive spread of fake news has the potential for extremely negative impacts on individuals and society. Therefore, fake news detection on social media has recently become an emerging research that is attracting tremendous attention. Fake news detection on social media presents unique characteristics and challenges that make existing detection algorithms from traditional news media ine ective or not applicable. First, fake news is intentionally written to mislead readers to believe false information, which makes it difficult and nontrivial to detect based on news content; therefore, we need to include auxiliary information, such as user social engagements on social media, to help make a determination. Second, exploiting this auxiliary information is challenging in and of itself as users' social engagements with fake news produce data that is big, incomplete, unstructured, and noisy. Because the issue of fake news detection on social media is both challenging and relevant, we conducted this survey to further facilitate research on the problem. In this survey, we present a comprehensive review of detecting fake news on social media, including fake news characterizations on psychology and social theories, existing algorithms from a data mining perspective, evaluation metrics and representative datasets. We also discuss related research areas, open problems, and future research directions for fake news detection on social media.
Citations
More filters
TL;DR: FauxWard as discussed by the authors is a graph convolutional neural network framework that explicitly explores the complex information extracted from a user comment network of a social media post to effectively identify fauxtography.
Abstract: Online social media has been a popular source for people to consume and share news content. More recently, the spread of misinformation online has caused widespread concerns. In this work, we focus on a critical task of detecting fauxtography on social media where the image and associated text together convey misleading information. Many efforts have been made to mitigate misinformation online, but we found that the fauxtography problem has not been fully addressed by existing work. Solutions focusing on detecting fake images or misinformed texts alone on social media often fail to identify the misinformation delivered together by the image and the associated text of a fauxtography post. In this paper, we develop FauxWard, a novel graph convolutional neural network framework that explicitly explores the complex information extracted from a user comment network of a social media post to effectively identify fauxtography. FauxWard is content-free in the sense that it does not analyze the visual or textual contents of the post itself, which makes it robust against sophisticated fauxtography uploaders who intentionally craft image-centric posts by editing either the text or image content. We evaluate FauxWard on two real-world datasets collected from mainstream social media platforms (i.e., Reddit and Twitter). The results show that FauxWard is both effective and efficient in identifying fauxtography posts on social media.
6 citations
TL;DR: In this paper , the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) and the classifier vote ensemble (SCLAVOEM) method were proposed for predicting COVID-19 infodemic tweets.
Abstract: Fake COVID-19 tweets are dangerous since they are misinformative, completely inaccurate, as threatening the efforts for flattening the pandemic curve. Thus, aside the COVID-19 pandemic, dealing with fake news and myths about the virus constitute an infodemic issue, which must be tackled by ensuring only valid information. In this context, this study proposed the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) and the classifier vote ensemble (SCLAVOEM) method as a fake news classifier and a hyper parameter optimization approach for predictive modelling of COVID-19 infodemic tweets. Hyper parameter optimization variables were deployed across specific points of the proposed model and a minority oversampling of training sets was applied within imbalanced class representations. Experimental applications by the SCLAVOEM for COVID-19 infodemic prediction returned 0.999 and 1.000 weighted averages for F-measure and area under curve (AUC), respectively. Thanks to the SMOTE, the performance increases of 3.74 and 1.11%; 5.05 and 0.29%; 4.59 and 8.05% was seen in three different data sets. Eventually, the SCLAVOEM provided a framework for predictive detecting 'fake tweets' and three classifiers: 'positive', 'negative' and 'click-trap' (piège à clics). It is thought that the model will automatically flag fake information on Twitter, hence protecting the public from inaccurate and information overload.
6 citations
TL;DR: Zhang et al. as mentioned in this paper proposed an end-to-end model called deepMONITOR that is based on deep neural networks and allows quite accurate automated rumor verification by utilizing all three characteristics: post textual and image contents, as well as sentiment.
Abstract: Reputed by their low-cost, easy-access, real-time and valuable information, social media also wildly spread unverified or fake news. Rumors can notably cause severe damage on individuals and the society. Therefore, rumor detection on social media has recently attracted tremendous attention. Most rumor detection approaches focus on rumor feature analysis and social features, i.e., metadata in social media. Unfortunately, these features are data-specific and may not always be available, e.g., when the rumor has just popped up and not yet propagated. In contrast, post contents (including images or videos) play an important role and can indicate the diffusion purpose of a rumor. Furthermore, rumor classification is also closely related to opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, exploiting images and sentiments is little investigated.Considering the available multimodal features from microblogs, notably, we propose in this paper an end-to-end model called deepMONITOR that is based on deep neural networks and allows quite accurate automated rumor verification, by utilizing all three characteristics: post textual and image contents, as well as sentiment. deepMONITOR concatenates image features with the joint text and sentiment features to produce a reliable, fused classification. We conduct extensive experiments on two large-scale, real-world datasets. The results show that deepMONITOR achieves a higher accuracy than state-of-the-art methods.
6 citations
6 citations
Posted Content•
TL;DR: A framework to characterize leaders in Twitter based on the analysis of the social graph derived from the activity in this social network, which is proposed as the basis for a constructive application to empower users with a positive influence in the collective behaviour of the network and the propagation of information.
Abstract: Information is key during a crisis such as the current COVID-19 pandemic as it greatly shapes people opinion, behaviour and even their psychological state. It has been acknowledged from the Secretary-General of the United Nations that the infodemic of misinformation is an important secondary crisis produced by the pandemic. Infodemics can amplify the real negative consequences of the pandemic in different dimensions: social, economic and even sanitary. For instance, infodemics can lead to hatred between population groups that fragment the society influencing its response or result in negative habits that help the pandemic propagate. On the contrary, reliable and trustful information along with messages of hope and solidarity can be used to control the pandemic, build safety nets and help promote resilience and antifragility. We propose a framework to characterize leaders in Twitter based on the analysis of the social graph derived from the activity in this social network. Centrality metrics are used to identify relevant nodes that are further characterized in terms of users parameters managed by Twitter. We then assess the resulting topology of clusters of leaders. Although this tool may be used for surveillance of individuals, we propose it as the basis for a constructive application to empower users with a positive influence in the collective behaviour of the network and the propagation of information.
6 citations
References
More filters
[...]
TL;DR: Deep learning is making major advances in solving problems that have resisted the best attempts of the artificial intelligence community for many years, and will have many more successes in the near future because it requires very little engineering by hand and can easily take advantage of increases in the amount of available computation and data.
Abstract: Deep learning allows computational models that are composed of multiple processing layers to learn representations of data with multiple levels of abstraction. These methods have dramatically improved the state-of-the-art in speech recognition, visual object recognition, object detection and many other domains such as drug discovery and genomics. Deep learning discovers intricate structure in large data sets by using the backpropagation algorithm to indicate how a machine should change its internal parameters that are used to compute the representation in each layer from the representation in the previous layer. Deep convolutional nets have brought about breakthroughs in processing images, video, speech and audio, whereas recurrent nets have shone light on sequential data such as text and speech.
46,982 citations
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develop an alternative model, called prospect theory, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights.
Abstract: This paper presents a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develops an alternative model, called prospect theory. Choices among risky prospects exhibit several pervasive effects that are inconsistent with the basic tenets of utility theory. In particular, people underweight outcomes that are merely probable in comparison with outcomes that are obtained with certainty. This tendency, called the certainty effect, contributes to risk aversion in choices involving sure gains and to risk seeking in choices involving sure losses. In addition, people generally discard components that are shared by all prospects under consideration. This tendency, called the isolation effect, leads to inconsistent preferences when the same choice is presented in different forms. An alternative theory of choice is developed, in which value is assigned to gains and losses rather than to final assets and in which probabilities are replaced by decision weights. The value function is normally concave for gains, commonly convex for losses, and is generally steeper for losses than for gains. Decision weights are generally lower than the corresponding probabilities, except in the range of low prob- abilities. Overweighting of low probabilities may contribute to the attractiveness of both insurance and gambling. EXPECTED UTILITY THEORY has dominated the analysis of decision making under risk. It has been generally accepted as a normative model of rational choice (24), and widely applied as a descriptive model of economic behavior, e.g. (15, 4). Thus, it is assumed that all reasonable people would wish to obey the axioms of the theory (47, 36), and that most people actually do, most of the time. The present paper describes several classes of choice problems in which preferences systematically violate the axioms of expected utility theory. In the light of these observations we argue that utility theory, as it is commonly interpreted and applied, is not an adequate descriptive model and we propose an alternative account of choice under risk. 2. CRITIQUE
35,067 citations
27,773 citations
09 Jan 2004
TL;DR: A theory of intergroup conflict and some preliminary data relating to the theory is presented in this article. But the analysis is limited to the case where the salient dimensions of the intergroup differentiation are those involving scarce resources.
Abstract: This chapter presents an outline of a theory of intergroup conflict and some preliminary data relating to the theory. Much of the work on the social psychology of intergroup relations has focused on patterns of individual prejudices and discrimination and on the motivational sequences of interpersonal interaction. The intensity of explicit intergroup conflicts of interests is closely related in human cultures to the degree of opprobrium attached to the notion of "renegade" or "traitor." The basic and highly reliable finding is that the trivial, ad hoc intergroup categorization leads to in-group favoritism and discrimination against the out-group. Many orthodox definitions of "social groups" are unduly restrictive when applied to the context of intergroup relations. The equation of social competition and intergroup conflict rests on the assumptions concerning an "ideal type" of social stratification in which the salient dimensions of intergroup differentiation are those involving scarce resources.
14,812 citations
TL;DR: Cumulative prospect theory as discussed by the authors applies to uncertain as well as to risky prospects with any number of outcomes, and it allows different weighting functions for gains and for losses, and two principles, diminishing sensitivity and loss aversion, are invoked to explain the characteristic curvature of the value function and the weighting function.
Abstract: We develop a new version of prospect theory that employs cumulative rather than separable decision weights and extends the theory in several respects. This version, called cumulative prospect theory, applies to uncertain as well as to risky prospects with any number of outcomes, and it allows different weighting functions for gains and for losses. Two principles, diminishing sensitivity and loss aversion, are invoked to explain the characteristic curvature of the value function and the weighting functions. A review of the experimental evidence and the results of a new experiment confirm a distinctive fourfold pattern of risk attitudes: risk aversion for gains and risk seeking for losses of high probability; risk seeking for gains and risk aversion for losses of low probability. Expected utility theory reigned for several decades as the dominant normative and descriptive model of decision making under uncertainty, but it has come under serious question in recent years. There is now general agreement that the theory does not provide an adequate description of individual choice: a substantial body of evidence shows that decision makers systematically violate its basic tenets. Many alternative models have been proposed in response to this empirical challenge (for reviews, see Camerer, 1989; Fishburn, 1988; Machina, 1987). Some time ago we presented a model of choice, called prospect theory, which explained the major violations of expected utility theory in choices between risky prospects with a small number of outcomes (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979; Tversky and Kahneman, 1986). The key elements of this theory are 1) a value function that is concave for gains, convex for losses, and steeper for losses than for gains,
13,433 citations