Female journalists under attack? Explaining gender differences in reactions to audiences’ attacks:
Summary (3 min read)
Introduction
- In today’s media-permeated societies, public figures are regularly harassed by their audiences, but not all of them seem to be equally impacted.
- They are attacked through letters, face-toface, and these days overwhelmingly online, such as on social networking sites, in emails, and in comment sections.
- Thus, the present study examines why female journalists might show different avoidance behavior from male journalists as a reaction to attacks.
- This theoretical framework is particularly suitable because it contrasts two possible explanations for gendered behavior.
Coping with attacks
- When individuals are confronted with attacks and hate speech, whether offline or online, they cope with it by adapting their attitudes and their behaviors (e.g. Leets, 2002).
- Commonly, men and women are expected to behave in accordance with dominant beliefs about gender roles (Berger et al., 1980; Webster et al., 2018).
- If people apply emotion-focused adaptations, they avoid the threat that reduces stress and anxiety (Roth and Cohen, 1986).
- In contexts where journalists cope with attacks against them personally or against their colleagues, avoidance strategies are of specific concern.
- Here, the authors use the proposed mechanisms of sanction severity and of stress resulting from gender role socialization as a basic framework to predict why female journalists are more likely than male journalists to apply avoidance strategies as a response to attacks.
Data and method
- This study uses data from an online survey of journalists in Switzerland conducted between July and October 2017.
- Some survey questions were inspired by similar surveys by Preuss et al. (2017) and Nilsson and Örnebring (2016).
- The authors used two contact channels to maximize the reach of the survey.
- The authors explicitly motivated journalists who had never been attacked to participate to minimize a nonresponse bias, because attacked journalists may more likely self-select into the survey.
- The final sample can be considered representative for journalists in Switzerland (see Table I in the Supplementary Material for a socio-demographic comparison with an extensive study on journalists in Switzerland by Dingerkus et al. (2018)).
Measurements
- The three outcome variables represent the three strategies journalists used to avoid future attacks (last 24 months).
- Journalists were asked relatively how often they, as a reaction to attacks, (1) had avoided reading readers’ comments to their publications, (2) had avoided contacting their audience by limiting social media activities or keeping their contact information hidden, and (3) had limited or closed the possibility of comments to their publications.
- This variable is dichotomous, although in the survey the authors offered a third option (“other”) besides these two gender options.
- The authors measured the migration background of the journalists with two dichotomous variables.
- Frequency of publishing indicates how often journalists published journalistic content.
Mediation model.
- The authors recommend a bootstrap test of the indirect effect and reporting the coefficients and the 95% confidence intervals of this test.
- Furthermore, the authors report the unstandardized regression coefficients of the two regression steps in Figure 2 to allow a more detailed interpretation of the results.
- The authors used a multiple imputation method to deal with questions some journalists had not answered (on average less than 7% observations of a variable were missing).
- For the first regression step, the authors treated the mediator variables as quasi-metric and applied standard ordinary least square (OLS) regressions.
- Across all models, the main results remain robust.
Results
- Overall, their results do not support the hypotheses on sanction severity but fully support the hypothesis on stress by gender socialization: as shown in Table 1, the coefficients of the indirect effect of sexually attacked and physically–materially threatened are not significant, while the indirect effect of the stress mediation is significant for all three outcomes.
- For the coefficients of the regression steps, see Figure 2 (and, for more details, see Tables III and IV in the Supplementary Material).
Sexually attacked
- The first regression step in calculating the indirect effect shows that women are more likely to be sexually attacked.
- The coefficient of gender in the sexually attacked regression is significant.
- Nevertheless, there is no overall mediation effect for being sexually attacked, because the mean indirect effect from the bootstrap analysis is not significant for any of the outcome variables (accordingly, the 95% confidence interval includes zero in all three outcome variables).
- Therefore, being sexually attacked does not mediate gender differences in avoiding strategies.
- In the first regression step, the gender coefficient is not significant, indicating that there is no difference between men and women in the likelihood of being physically–materially threatened.
Stress due to gender socialization
- For stress, the mean indirect effect of the bootstrap analysis is positive and significant, with a 95% confidence interval excluding zero for all three outcomes: limiting engagement with audience, adapting reporting behavior, and considering quitting journalism.
- The coefficients for the three outcome variables regressed on stress are positive.
- The size of the indirect effect that is mediated by stress relative to the total effect for limiting engagement with audience is 0.31/0.705 = 0.443; for adapting reporting behavior 0.736; and for considering quitting journalism 1.740.
- The direct effect of gender on all three outcomes is not significant when mediators are included.
- Therefore, the authors have an indirect-only mediation (Zhao et al., 2010), meaning that gender affects the outcomes only via the indirect path through stress.
Discussion
- In today’s media-permeated societies, many public figures such as journalists are regularly harassed, particularly online.
- The mediation results explain this gendered avoidance by a gender difference in feeling stressed from attacks.
- More importantly, however, female journalists are not more likely than males to apply avoidance strategies because they are more likely to be sexually attacked or physically–materially threatened.
- First, although the inclusion of diverse control variables and the theoretical foundation minimize confounding factors, the survey design does not allow causal inferences to be drawn.
Adams C (2018) “They Go for Gender First”. Journalism Practice 12(7): 850–869.
- Almeida DM and Kessler RC (1998) Everyday stressors and gender differences in daily distress.
- Chen GM, Pain P, Chen VY, et al. (2018) ‘You really have to have a thick skin’: a cross-cultural perspective on how online harassment influences female journalists.
- Tittle CR and Logan CH (1973) Sanctions and deviance: evidence and remaining questions.
Did you find this useful? Give us your feedback
Citations
[...]
393 citations
70 citations
Cites background or methods from "Female journalists under attack? Ex..."
...These findings echo concerns raised by Stahel and Schoen (2019) that “unequal gender reactions to attacks can systematically disadvantage women.”...
[...]
...Women generally report a higher incidence of online harassment than men (Eckert, 2018; Mijatović, 2016; Stahel & Schoen, 2019)....
[...]
...In the end, “the original idea of involving the audience in news production, aimed at strengthening democratic structures and weakening exclusive gatekeeping ones ... might boomerang; it may promote inequality within the journalistic profession” (Stahel & Schoen, 2019, p. 16)....
[...]
...…that one gender is more often placed in situations (such as audience-facing roles) that elicit greater possibilities for harassment, a difference that could account for much of their greater reported rates of harassment (see also Löfgren Nilsson & Örnebring, 2016; Stahel & Schoen, 2019)....
[...]
...This led them to conclude that their study, at least in Switzerland, “contradicts the image of women as the main target of particularly severe attacks” (cf. Binns, 2017; Stahel & Schoen, 2019, p. 15)....
[...]
25 citations
22 citations
19 citations
Cites background from "Female journalists under attack? Ex..."
...This is evident in the way newsrooms control comments section as much as in the tactics that journalists choose to manage public access to their contact information and privacy, as well as their social media activity (Bossio and Holton 2019; Stahel and Schoen 2019; Xia et al. 2020)....
[...]
References
1,178 citations
897 citations
"Female journalists under attack? Ex..." refers background or methods in this paper
...Drawing on the reasoning of sanction severity (Garoupa, 2001; Tittle and Logan, 1973; Wenzel, 2004), gender roles (Berger et al., 1980; Eagly and Wood, 2011) and the status incongruity hypothesis (Rudman et al....
[...]
...Drawing on the reasoning of sanction severity (Garoupa, 2001; Tittle and Logan, 1973; Wenzel, 2004), gender roles (Berger et al., 1980; Eagly and Wood, 2011) and the status incongruity hypothesis (Rudman et al., 2012), we expect journalists who do not conform to gender role expectations to be more…...
[...]
...Commonly, men and women are expected to behave in accordance with dominant beliefs about gender roles (Berger et al., 1980; Webster et al., 2018)....
[...]
751 citations
"Female journalists under attack? Ex..." refers background in this paper
...These women undermine the presumed gender differences, and “discredit the system in which men have more access to power and resources for ostensibly legitimate reasons” (Rudman et al., 2012: 166)....
[...]
...…the main target of particularly severe attacks (e.g. Chen et al., 2018; Ferrier and GarudPatkar, 2018; Friedersdorf, 2014; Tofalvy, 2017) and specifically of women in journalism being particularly severely sanctioned for any perceived status incongruency (Eagly and Wood, 2011; Rudman et al., 2012)....
[...]
...Consequently, the journalistic position is linked to power or pursuing power, but power as a masculine, high-status attribute is proscribed from female journalists (Rudman et al., 2012)....
[...]
...This will lead women to be more likely than men to avoid positions of power by attenuating their status (Rudman et al., 2012)....
[...]
...…2001; Tittle and Logan, 1973; Wenzel, 2004), gender roles (Berger et al., 1980; Eagly and Wood, 2011) and the status incongruity hypothesis (Rudman et al., 2012), we expect journalists who do not conform to gender role expectations to be more likely to be severely attacked than those who…...
[...]
[...]
708 citations
"Female journalists under attack? Ex..." refers background or methods in this paper
...People tend to infer innate and stable attributes of the sexes from these behaviors (Eagly and Wood, 2011)....
[...]
...Consistent with the theoretical reasoning on gender-typed self-concepts and the empirical evidence on gendered stress (Dedovic et al., 2009; Eagly and Wood, 2011; Kenski et al., 2017; Rudolph and Hammen, 1999), we expect that the gender difference in the response to attacks is a result of gender…...
[...]
...Correspondingly, due to their gender, women tend to be ascribed a low status and men a high one (Eagly and Wood, 2011)....
[...]
...Early socialization and parental gender role models form boys’ and girls’ gender-typed self-concepts, which emphasize to each what is important to their sense of self and self-worth (Dedovic et al., 2009; Eagly and Wood, 2011)....
[...]
...Gender role beliefs are stereotypes about the social roles of men and women and their associated behaviors and attributes (Eagly and Wood, 2011; Prentice and Carranza, 2002)....
[...]
643 citations
"Female journalists under attack? Ex..." refers background in this paper
...…the theoretical reasoning on gender-typed self-concepts and the empirical evidence on gendered stress (Dedovic et al., 2009; Eagly and Wood, 2011; Kenski et al., 2017; Rudolph and Hammen, 1999), we expect that the gender difference in the response to attacks is a result of gender socialization....
[...]
...…empirical studies suggest that women are on average more stressed than men by significant events, such as births and deaths occurring in their own lives or their close social network; this is especially true of interpersonal events (Almeida and Kessler, 1998; Matud, 2004; Rudolph and Hammen, 1999)....
[...]