scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Fixed-b Inference in the Presence of Time-Varying Volatility

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors employ the wild bootstrap (Cavaliere and Taylor, 2008, ET), resort to time transformations and select test statistics and asymptotics according to the outcome of a heteroscedasticity test.
Abstract
The fixed-b asymptotic framework provides refinements in the use of heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent variance estimators. The resulting limiting distributions of t-statistics are, however, not pivotal when the unconditional variance changes over time. Such time-varying volatility is an important issue for many financial and macroeconomic time series. To regain pivotal fixed-b inference under time-varying volatility, we discuss three alternative approaches. We (i) employ the wild bootstrap (Cavaliere and Taylor, 2008, ET), (ii) resort to time transformations (Cavaliere and Taylor, 2008, JTSA) and (iii) consider to select test statistics and asymptotics according to the outcome of a heteroscedasticity test, since small-b asymptotics deliver standard limiting distributions irrespective of the socalled variance profile of the series. We quantify the degree of size distortions from using the standard fixed-b approach assuming homoskedasticity and compare the effectiveness of the corrections via simulations. It turns out that the wild bootstrap approach is highly recommendable in terms of size and power. An application to testing for equal predictive ability using the Survey of Professional Forecasters illustrates the usefulness of the proposed corrections.

read more

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

Unit root tests under time-varying variances

TL;DR: In this paper, a general framework for investigating the effects of permanent changes in the variance of the errors of an autoregressive process on unit root tests is provided. But it is not shown that under permanent variance shifts, the conventional critical values can lead both to oversized and undersized tests.
Journal ArticleDOI

Modeling and forecasting (un)reliable realized covariances for more reliable financial decisions

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a new framework for modeling and forecasting common financial risks based on (un)reliable realized covariance measures constructed from high-frequency intraday data.
Journal ArticleDOI

Modeling and Forecasting (Un)Reliable Realized Covariances for More Reliable Financial Decisions

TL;DR: This work proposes a new framework for modeling and forecasting common financial risks based on (un)reliable realized covariance measures constructed from high-frequency intraday data that explicitly incorporates the effect of measurement errors and time-varying attenuation biases into the covariance forecasts.
Posted Content

Long Memory, Fractional Integration, and Cross-Sectional Aggregation

TL;DR: In this article, it is shown that the autocorrelation function is summable and hence the fractionally differenced process satisfy the conditions for being I(0), it still exhibits hyperbolic decay.
Journal ArticleDOI

System Estimation of Panel Data Models Under Long-Range Dependence

TL;DR: In this paper, a general dynamic panel data model is considered that incorporates individual and interactive fixed effects allowing for contemporaneous correlation in model innovations, removing the necessity to perform a priori unit-root or stationarity testing.
References
More filters
ReportDOI

A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix

Whitney K. Newey, +1 more
- 01 May 1987 - 
TL;DR: In this article, a simple method of calculating a heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix that is positive semi-definite by construction is described.
Posted Content

Comparing Predictive Accuracy

TL;DR: The authors describes the advantages of these studies and suggests how they can be improved and also provides aids in judging the validity of inferences they draw, such as multiple treatment and comparison groups and multiple pre- or post-intervention observations.
ReportDOI

Comparing Predictive Accuracy

TL;DR: In this article, explicit tests of the null hypothesis of no difference in the accuracy of two competing forecasts are proposed and evaluated, and asymptotic and exact finite-sample tests are proposed, evaluated and illustrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation

Donald W.K. Andrews
- 01 May 1991 - 
TL;DR: Using these results, data-dependent automatic bandwidth/lag truncation parameters are introduced and asymptotically optimal kernel/weighting scheme and bandwidth/agreement parameters are obtained.
Related Papers (5)