scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Fluorine Substituted Conjugated Polymer of Medium Band Gap Yields 7% Efficiency in Polymer-Fullerene Solar Cells

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The resulting fluorinated polymer PBnDT-FTAZ outperforms poly(3-hexylthiophene), the current medium band gap polymer of choice, and thus is a viable candidate for use in highly efficient tandem cells.
Abstract
Recent research advances on conjugated polymers for photovoltaic devices have focused on creating low band gap materials, but a suitable band gap is only one of many performance criteria required for a successful conjugated polymer. This work focuses on the design of two medium band gap (∼2.0 eV) copolymers for use in photovoltaic cells which are designed to possess a high hole mobility and low highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy levels. The resulting fluorinated polymer PBnDT−FTAZ exhibits efficiencies above 7% when blended with [6,6]-phenyl C61-butyric acid methyl ester in a typical bulk heterojunction, and efficiencies above 6% are still maintained at an active layer thicknesses of 1 μm. PBnDT−FTAZ outperforms poly(3-hexylthiophene), the current medium band gap polymer of choice, and thus is a viable candidate for use in highly efficient tandem cells. PBnDT−FTAZ also highlights other performance criteria which contribute to high photovoltaic efficiency, bes...

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Supporting Information
Fluorine Substituted Conjugated Polymer of Medium Band Gap Yields
7% Efficiency in Polymer-Fullerene Solar Cells
Samuel C. Price
1
, Andrew C. Stuart
1
, Liqiang Yang
2
, Huaxing Zhou
1
, and Wei You
1,2, *
1. Department of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North
Carolina 27599-3290
2. Curriculum in Applied Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3287
*
To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: wyou@email.unc.edu.
S1

Table of Contents
1. Experimental section (S3-S8).
2. NMR Spectra (S9-S18).
3. Photographs of polymer solutions (S19).
4. Supplemental Cyclic Voltammetry, Reduction Curves (S20).
5. SCLC Hole Mobility Measurement Graph (S20).
6. X-Ray Diffraction Spectroscopy (S21).
7. Atomic Force Microscopy Film Characterization (S22).
8. Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (S23).
9. Film Thickness Measurements via SEM (S24-25).
10. Reference (S26)
S2

Reagents. All solvents are ACS grade unless otherwise noted. Anhydrous THF was obtained
by distillation from sodium/benzophenone prior to use. Diisopropylamine was distilled from
potassium hydroxide prior to use. 4,7-dibromo-2-(2-butyloctyl)-2H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole,
1,2
2,6-Bis(trimethyltin)-4,8-(3-butylnonyl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b’]dithiophene,
3
2-butyloctylbromide,
4
and 5,6-difluoro-1H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole
5
were prepared according to modified literature
procedures. All reagents were purchased from VWR, Fisher Scientific, Dynamic Absorbents,
Silicycle, Accela ChemBio Inc., and were used without further purification.
4,7-bis(5-bromothiophen-2-yl)-2-(2-butyloctyl)-2H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (HTAZ).
Thiophene (3.01 g, 2.5 eq) was dissolved in dry THF (40 mL) in a flame dried flask under argon.
The mixture was cooled to 0°C in an ice bath, and 1.6M n-BuLi in hexanes (22.8 mL, 2.55 eq)
was added dropwise over 3 minutes. The solution was stirred for 35 min maintaining the
temperature at 0°C, and then anhydrous ZnCl
2
(5.07 g, 2.6 eq) was added as a solution in 40 mL
dry THF. The reaction was stirred for 5 min at 0°C, and then Pd(PPh
3
)
2
Cl
2
(602 mg, 6 mol %)
was added in one portion. 4,7-dibromo-2-(2-butyloctyl)-2H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (6.39 g, 1.0
eq) was then added via cannula as a solution in 20 mL of dry THF. The reaction mixture was
then heated to reflux, and stirred for 16 h. The reaction mixture was then poured into water and
extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was then washed with water (3x), dried (MgSO
4
),
filtered, concentrated in vacuo, and purified by column chromatography on silica gel using 4:1
hexanes:CH
2
Cl
2
as the eluent. The resulting fluorescent yellow solid was then dissolved into
THF (80 mL), and N-bromosuccinimide (2.89 g, 2.0 eq) was added in one portion. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 3.5 h, and then poured into saturated NaHCO
3
solution and extracted with
ethyl acetate. The organic phase was then washed with water (3 ×), dried (MgSO
4
), filtered, and
S3

concentrated in vacuo. The material was then purified by column chromatography on silica gel,
using 3:1 hexanes:chloroform as the eluent. The resulting yellow solid (HTAZ) was then
recrystallized twice from isopropanol to yield a yellow powder. Yield (2 steps): 2.79 g (32%).
Fluorescent yellow solid; mp 70°C.
1
H NMR (CDCl
3
, 400 MHz, δ): 7.76 (d,
3
J
HH
= 3.6 Hz, 2H),
7.46 (s, 2H), 7.10 (d,
3
J
HH
= 4 Hz, 2H), 4.71 (d,
3
J
HH
= 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.27 (m, 1H), 1.26 (m, 16H),
0.90 (t,
3
J
HH
= 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (t,
3
J
HH
= 6 Hz, 3H).
13
C NMR (CDCl
3
, 100 MHz, δ): 141.55,
141.24, 130.80, 126.81, 122.90, 122.01, 113.16, 59.88, 39.09, 31.82, 31.38, 31.15, 29.56, 28.45,
26.17, 22.96, 22.65, 14.09. Anal. Calcd for C
26
H
31
Br
2
N
3
S
2
: C, 51.24; H, 5.13; N, 6.89. Found: C,
51.52; H, 4.95; N, 6.88.
Polymerization of PBnDT-HTAZ. 2,6-Bis(trimethyltin)-4,8-(3-butylnonyl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-
b’]dithiophene (132 mg, 1.0 eq), HTAZ (91.4 mg, 1.0 eq), Pd
2
(dba)
3
(2.8 mg, 0.02 eq), and
tri(o-tolyl)phosphine (7.2 mg, 0.16 eq) were combined in a dry microwave vial. The vial was
sealed with a septum cap, and then evacuated and refilled with argon three times. Dry, oxygen
free o-xylene (0.75 mL) was added. The mixture was then reacted in a microwave reactor for 20
min, at 200°C (at 300W), and then cooled to room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted
with chlorobenzene (3 mL), and then the polymer solution was precipitated into methanol (100
mL) at room temperature. The resulting purple-black solid was filtered into a Soxhlet thimble,
and extracted with methanol, ethyl acetate, hexanes, and chloroform until the wash from each
extraction was colorless. When there was no solid remaining in the thimble, the chloroform
fraction was concentrated, and chlorobenzene was added (5 mL). The polymer solution was then
precipitated into methanol at room temperature, filtered, and dried under vacuum at 0.5 mmHg.
Yield: 143 mg (95%). Purple metallic solid.
1
H NMR @ 400K (C
2
D
2
Cl
4
, 400 MHz, δ): 7.86,
S4

7.23, 4.87, 3.14, 2.41, 1.87, 1.50, 1.08. GPC (1,2,4-trichlorobenzene at 135°C): M
n
= 47.6
kg/mol, M
w
= 133.4 kg/mol, PDI = 2.57.
2-(2-butyloctyl)-5,6-difluoro-2H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (2). 5,6-difluoro-1H-
benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (8.04 g, 1.0 eq), potassium tert-butoxide (5.87 g, 1.01 eq), and 2-
butyloctylbromide (13.04 g, 1.01 eq) were dissolved in 130 mL of methanol. The reaction was
heated to reflux for 17 h. The reaction mixture was then poured into saturated NH
4
Cl solution,
and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with water (2x), dried (Na
2
SO
4
),
filtered, concentrated in vacuo, and purified by column chromatography on silica gel using 10:1
hexanes:ethyl acetate as the eluent. Yield: 2.88 g (17%). Colorless oil.
1
H NMR (CDCl
3
, 400
MHz, δ): 7.59 (t,
3
J
HF
= 8.4 Hz, 2H), 4.58 (d,
3
J
HH
= 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.22 (m, 1H), 1.28 (m, 16H),
0.86 (t,
3
J
HH
= 5.6 Hz, 6H).
4,7-dibromo-2-(2-butyloctyl)-5,6-difluoro-2H-benzo[d][1,2,3]triazole (3). 1.6M n-BuLi in
hexanes (12.5 mL, 2.25 eq) was added dropwise over 3 min to a solution of diisopropylamine
(3.10 mL, 2.5 eq) and dry THF (90 mL) under argon at -78°C. The solution was stirred for 15
min, and then a solution of Compound 2 (2.88 g, 1.0 eq) and trimethylsilyl chloride (3.1 mL,
2.75 eq) in dry THF (35 mL) was added dropwise over 10 minutes at -78°C. -78°C was
maintained while the reaction was stirred for 3 h, and then the reaction was quenched with 10
mL of saturated NH
4
Cl. The reaction was warmed to room temperature and poured into saturated
NH
4
Cl. The mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate, washed with water (3x), dried (MgSO
4
),
and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was then dissolved into CHCl
3
(30 mL), and bromine
(3.6 mL, 8.0 eq) was added in one portion, and the reaction was stirred for 16 h at room
temperature, shielded from light. The reaction was then poured into a mixture of 10% NaOH and
ice, and extracted with methylene chloride. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried
S5

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Polymer solar cells

TL;DR: In this article, a review summarizes recent progress in the development of polymer solar cells and provides a synopsis of major achievements in the field over the past few years, while potential future developments and the applications of this technology are also briefly discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency

TL;DR: The development of a high-performance low bandgap polymer that enables a solution processed tandem solar cell with certified 10.6% power conversion efficiency under standard reporting conditions, which is the first certified polymer solar cell efficiency over 10%.
Journal ArticleDOI

Molecular design of photovoltaic materials for polymer solar cells: toward suitable electronic energy levels and broad absorption.

TL;DR: This Account discusses the basic requirements and scientific issues in the molecular design of high efficiency photovoltaic molecules, and summarizes recent progress in electronic energy level engineering and absorption spectral broadening of the donor and acceptor photvoltaic materials by my research group and others.
Journal ArticleDOI

Small molecule semiconductors for high-efficiency organic photovoltaics

TL;DR: This review summarizes the developments in small molecular donors, acceptors, and donor-acceptor dyad systems for high-performance multilayer, bulk heterojunction, and single-component OPVs and focuses on correlations of molecular chemical structures with properties, such as absorption, energy levels, charge mobilities, and photovoltaic performances.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p‐n Junction Solar Cells

TL;DR: In this article, an upper theoretical limit for the efficiency of p−n junction solar energy converters, called the detailed balance limit of efficiency, has been calculated for an ideal case in which the only recombination mechanism of holeelectron pairs is radiative as required by the principle of detailed balance.
Journal ArticleDOI

High-efficiency solution processable polymer photovoltaic cells by self-organization of polymer blends

TL;DR: In this article, the authors report highly efficient polymer solar cells based on a bulk heterojunction of polymer poly(3-hexylthiophene) and methanofullerene.
Journal ArticleDOI

Design Rules for Donors in Bulk‐Heterojunction Solar Cells—Towards 10 % Energy‐Conversion Efficiency

TL;DR: In this article, the authors presented a review of several organic photovoltaics (OPV) technologies, including conjugated polymers with high-electron-affinity molecules like C60 (as in the bulk-heterojunction solar cell).
Journal ArticleDOI

Thermally stable, efficient polymer solar cells with nanoscale control of the interpenetrating network morphology

TL;DR: By applying specific fabrication conditions summarized in the Experimental section and post-production annealing at 150°C, polymer solar cells with power-conversion efficiency approaching 5% were demonstrated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bulk heterojunction solar cells with internal quantum efficiency approaching 100

TL;DR: In this paper, a polymer solar cell based on a bulk hetereojunction design with an internal quantum efficiency of over 90% across the visible spectrum (425 nm to 575 nm) is reported.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (4)
Q1. What have the authors contributed in "Supporting information" ?

Price et al. this paper showed that fluorine substituted conjugated polymer of medium band gap yields 7 % efficiency in polymer-fullerene solar cells. 

When there was no solid remaining in the Soxhlet thimble, the chloroform fraction was then concentrated, and chlorobenzene was added (5 mL). 

1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz, δ): 7.97 (d, 3JHH = 4 Hz, 2H), 7.13 (d, 3JHH =4 Hz, 2H), 4.68 (d, 3JHH = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.23 (m, 1H), 1.40 (m, 4H), 1.27 (m, 12H), 0.91 (t, 3JHH = 7.2 Hz, 3H), 0.86 (t, 3JHH = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 

13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz, δ): 146.89 (dd, 1JCF = 252 Hz, 2JCF = 19 Hz), 137.01 (t, 3,4JCF = 4.2 Hz), 133.76, 130.26 (m), 130.19, 115.92 (m), 109.29 (dd, 3JCF = 9.5 Hz, 4JCF = 4.4 Hz), 59.84, 39.10, 31.84, 31.41, 31.17, 29.57, 28.47, 26.20, 22.97, 22.66, 14.09.