scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Food allergy–related quality of life after double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in adults, adolescents, and children

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
HRQL scores improved after a DBPCFC, with greater improvements in HRQL scores after a negative outcome than a positive outcome (food allergy confirmed), demonstrating responsiveness of the FAQLQs.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Food allergy: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment

TL;DR: Advances and updates in the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of food allergy over the past 3 years are focused on, with incorporation of extensively heated forms of milk and egg into the diets of children who tolerate these foods represents a significant shift in clinical approach.
Journal ArticleDOI

Long-term clinical and immunological effects of probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy after treatment cessation: 4-year follow-up of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

TL;DR: Long-term outcomes in participants who completed a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of combined probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT), which was previously shown to induce desensitisation and 2-week sustained unresponsiveness, are assessed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality of Life Among Food Allergic Patients and Their Caregivers

TL;DR: This review summarizes progress made studying relationships between food allergy and quality of life (QOL) with an emphasis on recent work in the field, and suggests that undergoing oral food challenge to confirmFood allergy and oral immunotherapy to treat food allergy may each improve FAQOL among both patients and their caregivers.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation

TL;DR: In most circumstances, the threshold of discrimination for changes in health-related quality of life for chronic diseases appears to be approximately half a SD, which research in psychology has shown is approximately 1 part in 7.
Journal ArticleDOI

Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire

TL;DR: The observation that the minimal important difference is consistent across domains and for both improvement and deterioration will facilitate interpretation of results of studies examining quality of life.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

TL;DR: It is recommended that the MID is based primarily on relevant patient-based and clinical anchors, with clinical trial experience used to further inform understanding of MID.
Journal ArticleDOI

Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation.

TL;DR: Using data from a clinical trial of therapy for back pain, it is shown that reproducibility should generally be quantified with the intraclass correlation coefficient rather than the more common Pearson r.r. coefficient, and that reproduction by retest at one-to-two week intervals may result in more realistic estimates of the variability to be observed among control subjects in a longitudinal study.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures.

TL;DR: One can classify ways to establish the interpretability of quality-of-life measures as anchor based or distribution based, which relies on an independent standard or anchor that is itself interpretable and at least moderately correlated with the instrument being explored.
Related Papers (5)