scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Book

Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions

01 Aug 2013-
About: The article was published on 2013-08-01 and is currently open access. It has received 245 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Agrarian society.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors argues for the centrality of historical thinking in coming to grips with capitalism's planetary crises of the twenty-first century, arguing that historical thinking is essential to the understanding of the Anthropocene.
Abstract: This essay, in two parts, argues for the centrality of historical thinking in coming to grips with capitalism’s planetary crises of the twenty-first century. Against the Anthropocene’s shallow hist...

751 citations


Cites background from "Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions..."

  • ...…in the era of fossil capital, do we not also live in the era of agrarian capitalism – characterized by punctuated revolutions in class struggle, nature, and the productive forces, so necessary to the expanded reproduction of labor power (e.g. Bernstein 2010; McMichael 2013; Moore 2015a, ch. 10)?...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors traces the evolution of food sovereignty from the initial stages of the food sovereignty countermovement to the present, arguing that food sovereignty politics have not only traveled from countryside to city as consumers/citizens anticipate ecological constraints and compensate for unequal food distributions, but also they have been confronted with transitions in the food regime following the recent food crisis.
Abstract: To historicize food sovereignty is not simply to recognize its multiple forms and circumstances across time and space, but also to recognize its relation to the politics of capital in a crisis conjuncture. This paper traces the evolution of the food sovereignty vision from the initial stages of the food sovereignty countermovement to the present, arguing that food sovereignty politics have not only traveled from countryside to city as consumers/citizens anticipate ecological constraints and compensate for unequal food distributions, but also they have been confronted with transitions in the food regime following the recent food crisis. New enclosures, in the forms of land grabs and value-chains, administered by public-private ‘governance’ partnerships, have contradictory effects: threatening the peasant base of the food sovereignty countermovement, but also threatening to exacerbate the food crisis, as evidenced in recent food riot politics animated by the food sovereignty vision. As the food regime restr...

186 citations


Cites background from "Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions..."

  • ...It contributes to a general process of relocation of food production to the global South, combining cost saving and state-sponsored ‘agro-security mercantilism’ (McMichael 2013a)....

    [...]

  • ...Contrary to the classical agrarian question problematic, the movement privileges peasant agency in a programmatic approach to restoring the viability of the countryside for farming and addressing domestic food security – as governed by national democratic principles (McMichael 2013c)....

    [...]

  • ...Indirectly, there are the more seductive methods of tenuous chaining of smallholders to new value circuits controlled by agribusiness and subsidized with public monies (McMichael 2013b)....

    [...]

  • ...…this does not alter the WTO trade regime, since the limited peace clause applies essentially to low-income (rather than global) consumers residing in the relevant countries. for food supplies call the trade regime into question, triggering a process of restructuring (McMichael 2012, 2013a)....

    [...]

  • ...Arguably, the twenty-first-century agrarian question inverts the classical agrarian question’s theoretical focus on proletarian political opportunity, converting the question of capital’s reproduction to a question of the reproduction of the food producer (McMichael 2013c)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article provided a selective survey of food regimes and food regime analysis since the seminal article by Harriet Friedmann and Philip McMichael in 1989, and further traced through their subsequent (individual) work.
Abstract: This paper provides a selective survey of food regimes and food regime analysis since the seminal article by Harriet Friedmann and Philip McMichael in 1989, and further traced through their subsequent (individual) work. It identifies eight key elements or dimensions of food regime analysis, namely the international state system; international divisions of labour and patterns of trade; the ‘rules’ and discursive (ideological) legitimations of different food regimes; relations between agriculture and industry, including technical and environmental change in farming; dominant forms of capital and their modalities of accumulation; social forces (other than capitals and states); the tensions and contradictions of specific food regimes; and transitions between food regimes. These are used to summarise three food regimes in the history of world capitalism to date: a first regime from 1870 to 1914, a second regime from 1945 to 1973, and a third corporate food regime from the 1980s proposed by McMichael within the...

140 citations


Cites background or methods from "Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions..."

  • ...…with different purposes, with McMichael focussing on ‘social movements from the global South as the key hinge in a current food regime dynamic’ (146–47).36 Later, he observed that his difference with Friedmann ‘raises the issue of what constitutes a regime’ (McMichael 2013, 42), a basic issue then....

    [...]

  • ...The achievements of ‘high farming’ and their conditions were stressed in the work of Colin Duncan (1996, 1999), referred to by Friedmann (2000, 489–91) and McMichael (2013, 70–71). broad agricultural crisis in Europe resulting from cheap overseas grains, resulted in widespread protectionism....

    [...]

  • ...Can this problem be made to vanish by asserting that ‘“peasantness” is a political rather than an analytical category’ (McMichael 2013, 59, emphasis added)?...

    [...]

  • ...This is not inevitable, however: the ‘value relation analytic’ can reveal ‘how capital’s food regime exploits labour-power and nature together’ (McMichael 2013, 135)....

    [...]

  • ...(McMichael 2009, 153) A major instance of this process is the ‘neoliberalization of nature’ (McMichael 2013, 130) beyond the mechanisation and ‘chemicalisation’ historically associated with industrial agriculture and intensified today; that is to say, the pursuit by corporations of private property…...

    [...]

01 Jan 2016

135 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2017-Antipode
TL;DR: In this paper, three interlinked strategies for action are presented: enhancing the reflexivity and cohesion of the urban food movement by articulating a challenge to neoliberal urbanism; converging urban and agrarian food justice struggles by shaping urban agroecology; and regaining control over social reproduction by engaging with food commoning.
Abstract: Recent literature has pointed to the role of urban agriculture in self-empowerment and learning, and in constituting ways to achieve food justice. Building on this work the paper looks at the potential and constraints for overcoming the residual and contingent status of urban agriculture. The first part of the paper aims to expand traditional class/race/ethnicity discussions and to reflect on global, cultural, procedural, capability, distributional and socio-environmental forms of injustice that unfold in the different stages of urban food production. The second part reflects on how to bring forward food justice and build a politics of engagement, capability and empowerment. Three interlinked strategies for action are presented: (1) enhancing the reflexivity and cohesion of the urban food movement by articulating a challenge to neoliberal urbanism; (2) converging urban and agrarian food justice struggles by shaping urban agroecology; and (3) regaining control over social reproduction by engaging with food commoning.

115 citations


Cites background from "Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions..."

  • ...Given the structure – and structuring power - of the food ‘regime’ (McMichael 2013), and the limited space and diffusion of short food chains, for a number of products the choice may well just be ‘grow-your-own’....

    [...]