scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Forecasting Americans’ long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, a simulation-based fleet evolution framework is proposed to forecast Americans' long-term adoption levels of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) under eight different scenarios based on 5% and 10% annual drops in technology prices; 0, 5, and 10 percent annual increments in Americans' willingness to pay (WTP); and changes in government regulations (e.g., mandatory adoption of connectivity on new vehicles).
Abstract
Automobile manufacturers, transportation researchers, and policymakers are interested in knowing the future of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs). To this end, this study proposes a new simulation-based fleet evolution framework to forecast Americans’ long-term (year 2015–2045) adoption levels of CAV technologies under eight different scenarios based on 5% and 10% annual drops in technology prices; 0%, 5%, and 10% annual increments in Americans’ willingness to pay (WTP); and changes in government regulations (e.g., mandatory adoption of connectivity on new vehicles). This simulation was calibrated with data obtained from a survey of 2167 Americans, regarding their preferences for CAV technologies (e.g., WTP) and their household’s annual vehicle transaction decisions. Long-term fleet evolution suggests that the privately held light-duty-vehicle fleet will have 24.8% Level 4 AV penetration by 2045 if one assumes an annual 5% price drop and constant WTP values (from 2015 forward). This share jumps to 87.2% if one uses a 10% annual rate of decline in prices and a 10% annual rise in WTP values. Overall, simulations suggest that, without a rise in most people’s WTP, or policies that promote or require technologies, or unusually rapid reductions in technology costs, it is unlikely that the U.S. light-duty vehicle fleet’s technology mix will be anywhere near homogeneous by the year 2045.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Autonomous vehicles: challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the challenges and opportunities pertaining to transportation policies that may arise as a result of emerging autonomous vehicle (AV) technologies and propose a conceptual navigation model based on a fleet of AVs that are centrally dispatched over a network.
Journal ArticleDOI

What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment

TL;DR: In this paper, the influence of direct experience of an automated vehicle (AV, Level 3) and explaining and predicting public acceptance of AVs through a psychological model was analyzed. But the authors considered the last two determinants, namely perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), trust related to SDVs, and perceived safety (PS) while riding in our AV.
Journal ArticleDOI

Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a literature review on surveys regarding automated vehicles with the intention to investigate the various methods currently being applied and the conclusions they lead to and identify research gaps that can be addressed in future experiments.
Journal ArticleDOI

A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed an analytical capacity model for highway mixed traffic based on a Markov chain representation of spatial distribution of heterogeneous and stochastic headways, which captures not only the full spectrum of connected and autonomous vehicle market penetration rates but also all possible values of CAV platooning intensities.
Journal ArticleDOI

Are we ready to embrace connected and self-driving vehicles? A case study of Texans

TL;DR: In this article, the authors surveyed 1088 respondents across Texas to understand their opinions about smart vehicle technologies and related decisions and found that Texans are willing to pay (WTP) $2910, $4607, $7589, and $127 for Level 2, Level 3, and Level 4 automation and connectivity, respectively.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations

TL;DR: In this article, the authors proposed a nationally recognized licensing framework for AVs, determining appropriate standards for liability, security, and data privacy, which can be used to improve vehicle safety, congestion, and travel behavior.

BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models

TL;DR: Reference TRANSP-OR-CONF-2006-048 URL: http://transp-or.epfl.ch/documents/proceedings/Bier03.pdf
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective

TL;DR: A recent internet-based survey of 347 Austinites found that respondents perceive fewer crashes to be the primary benefit of autonomous vehicles (AVs), with equipment failure being their top concern as mentioned in this paper, and their average willingness to pay (WTP) for adding full (Level 4) automation ($7253) appears to be much higher than that for adding partial (Level 3) automation (3300) to their current vehicles.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles

TL;DR: In this paper, a stated choice survey was conducted and analyzed, using a mixed logit model, showing that service attributes including travel cost, travel time and waiting time may be critical determinants of the use of SAVs and the acceptance of DRS.

A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia

TL;DR: In this paper, a survey examined public opinion regarding self-driving-vehicle technology in three major English-speaking countries (the U.S., the U.K., and Australia) and yielded usable responses from 1,533 persons 18 years and older.
Related Papers (5)