Abstract: This paper explores cataloging in the Age of Google. It considers what the technologies now being adopted mean for cataloging in the future. The author begins by exploring how digital-era students do research--they find using Google easier than using libraries. Mass digitization projects now are bringing into question the role that library cataloging has traditionally performed. The author asks readers to consider if the detailed attention librarians have been paying to descriptive cataloging can still be justified, and if cost-effective means for access should be considered. ********** My career in librarianship has included work in cataloging, which I have always understood to be a major part of library functioning. But I did not fully realize how major until I made a discovery when I became associate librarian of the Library of Congress. The discovery was--financial the Library of Congress is investing in cataloging at the rate of $44 million a year! You can well appreciate that a cost of that magnitude really got my attention. If such an expenditure produces great benefits for the Library of Congress, libraries across the country, and others around the world, then we can justifiably argue that the $44 million is well spent. But in the age of digital information, Internet access, and electronic key word searching, just how much do we need to continue to spend on carefully constructed catalogs? That is the question I have come here this evening to pose--how should we think about cataloging in the Age of Google? I have not come to say that we no longer need the cataloger-produced bibliographic entry. I recognize that my own institution, the Library of Congress, created the bibliographic structure that is used by nearly every library in this country and by many around the world. Before starting any revolution against that structure, I want to take care to consider the potential consequences. But I have many questions about cataloging, and I believe we must face them together and begin answering collectively. I therefore welcome the invitation to speak here as an opportunity to begin that discussion. I need your advice, your judgment, and that of others in the library and research communities to consider what the technologies that all of us are now adopting mean for cataloging in the future. I ask you to think of this evening as the first step in a longer exploration of a difficult issue. Using the Library versus Googling Let me begin with a practical demonstration of the question's importance--an example of how digital-era students work. Let us suppose that you are a librarian at a small college near the middle of the continental United States. Let us even suppose that yours is the library whose Web site I recently picked at random to see what digital resources it was offering. I am pleased to tell you that I was impressed. In addition to an electronically searchable catalog of your own physical holdings, I found that you offer fourteen EBSCOHost online databases, thirteen online databases from OCLC FirstSearch, eleven InfoTrac online databases, five Lexis Nexis online databases, three Proquest online databases, and at least nine other online resources, including encyclopedias, dictionaries, electronic books, and materials for research on current issues. Consequently, users of your library have online access to literally hundreds of scholarly journals and other resources on all kinds of topics in a wide range of academic fields. Now let us suppose that I am one of your college's students with a term paper coming due. Let us also suppose that I have been assigned to write about the foreign policy of President Fillmore. In the old days, I might have walked to your library, looked in an encyclopedia there for "Fillmore," searched your paper card catalog to identify books on Fillmore, located these books by call number on a shelf, and looked through their tables of contents and maybe indexes to find what they contained on foreign policy. …