Foundation analysis and design
Citations
6 citations
Cites background from "Foundation analysis and design"
...Likewise, Bowles (1996) states that in his opinion, the relative density test is not of much value because it is difficult to obtain maximum and minimum unit weight values within a range of about 0.5 kN/m3: Herein, the authors will review the limitations and the unreliability of the concept of…...
[...]
...Likewise, Bowles (1996) states that in his opinion, the relative density test is not of much value because it is difficult to obtain maximum and minimum unit weight values within a range of about 0....
[...]
6 citations
Cites background or methods from "Foundation analysis and design"
...Qu = single pile capacity (kN) Qb = end bearing capacity of pile (kN) Qs = skin friction capacity of pile (kN) Various methods had been proposed to estimate the ultimate capacity of single piles, such as Reese and O’Neill (1989 in Das[2], Terzaghi and Peck, Meyerhof (1976 in [2] and [6]), etc....
[...]
...Meyerhof (1976 in [2] and [6]), Reese and Wright (1977), and Briaud et al....
[...]
6 citations
Cites background from "Foundation analysis and design"
...A Poisson’s ratio of 0.4 falls at the low end of the range reported by Baracos et al. (1983) and Bowles (1997), although it is not clear whether they are reporting a value for drained or undrained conditions....
[...]
6 citations
6 citations
Cites background from "Foundation analysis and design"
...5 kip/ft2] for dense gravel) to the force per unit area of the weir’s weight must be greater than one so as to make sure that the ground can withstand the force of the weir’s weight (Bowles 1996; British Standards Institute 1986)....
[...]
...…states that the ratio of the gravel bearing capacity (600 kPa [12.5 kip/ft2] for dense gravel) to the force per unit area of the weir’s weight must be greater than one so as to make sure that the ground can withstand the force of the weir’s weight (Bowles 1996; British Standards Institute 1986)....
[...]