Foundation analysis and design
Citations
2 citations
Cites background from "Foundation analysis and design"
...General conditions of Mohr’s circle to derive the Rankine earth pressure equations (modified after Bowles 2001) ........................................................................... 31 Figure 3.10....
[...]
...Bowles (2001) summarized the major assumptions made in Rankine’s theory as listed below: (a) Soil is isotropic and homogeneous and has internal friction but no cohesion....
[...]
...Soil structure system for the Rankine solution for = 90° (modified after Bowles 2001) .......................................................................................................................
[...]
2 citations
Cites background or methods from "Foundation analysis and design"
...c) is applied mostly outside of the US (Bowles, 1996; Robertson., 2006; Coduto, 2001)....
[...]
...It can affect the SPT blow count, and hence the bearing capacity which can be calculated using one of the formulae suggested in literature (Bowles 1996; Das 2011; Budhu 2008)....
[...]
...…stressing that later Karol (1960) approximated the value of cohesion and friction angle corresponding to the type of soil and the number of blows, however, at that time over burden correction was not defined as it is presented in Table 3.2 (Bowles, 1996; Coduto, 2001; Budhu, 2008; Rogers, 2006)....
[...]
...Hammer (Figure 3.2. c) is applied mostly outside of the US (Bowles, 1996; Robertson., 2006; Coduto, 2001)....
[...]
...For instance AASHTO (1996), Bowles (1996) ,Bowles and Denver(1982), D’Appolonia et al. (1970), Ghahramani and Behpoor (1989) for saturated clays, Kulhawy and Mayne (1990), Mezenbach (1961), Papadopoulos (1992), Schultz and Muhs (1967), Skempton (1986), Stroud (1988) and Tan et al. (1991) could…...
[...]
2 citations
2 citations
2 citations
Cites background from "Foundation analysis and design"
...The test is applicable for all fine-grained soils and may be done even where a trace of gravel is present (Bowles 1997)....
[...]