scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

From Morality to Virtue

01 Jul 1994-Social Theory and Practice-Vol. 20, Iss: 2, pp 221-244
About: This article is published in Social Theory and Practice.The article was published on 1994-07-01. It has received 74 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Virtue & Morality.
Citations
More filters
Reference BookDOI
01 Jan 2001
TL;DR: A companion to bioethics, A companion to Bioethics as mentioned in this paper, a companion to the bioethic, and a companion of the humanist movement in the 21st century.
Abstract: A companion to bioethics , A companion to bioethics , کتابخانه مرکزی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران

271 citations


Cites background from "From Morality to Virtue"

  • ...Michael Tooley...

    [...]

  • ...Michael Slote describes his view as “moral sentimentalism,” and it is an agent-based view: morality is understood entirely in terms of the motives of ideally benevolent agents....

    [...]

  • ...Michael J. Selgelid...

    [...]

  • ...As Michael Selgelid points out in his contribution to this volume (chapter 36), 90 percent of medical research resources are spent on diseases that account for only 10 percent of the global burden of disease – the diseases that people in rich countries are likely to suffer from....

    [...]

  • ...John D. Arras, University of Virginia Margaret Pabst Battin, University of Utah Joseph Boyle, University of Toronto Peter Braude, King’s College London Dan W. Brock, Harvard Medical School, Boston Alexander Morgan Capron, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Ruth Chadwick, Cardiff University, Wales James F. Childress, University of Virginia Angus Clarke, Cardiff University, Wales Jan Crosthwaite, University of Auckland, New Zealand Norman Daniels, Harvard University, Boston Govert den Hartogh, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Carl Elliott, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Segun Gbadegesin, Howard University, Washington, DC Lynn Gillam, University of Melbourne Raanan Gillon, Imperial College London Eric Gregory, Princeton University R. M. Hare, Deceased John Harris, University of Manchester Roger Higgs, King’s College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London Nils Holtug, University of Copenhagen Eike-Henner W. Kluge, University of Victoria, Canada xi contributors Michael Kottow, University of Chile, Santiago Donald W. Light, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey Christopher Lowry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong Florencia Luna, University of Buenos Aires Ruth Macklin, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York Jeff McMahan, Rutgers University, New Brunswick Paul Ulhas Macneill, University of Sydney Rita C. Manning, San José State University, California Sarah Marchand, St Paul, Minnesota Jonathan D. Moreno, University of Pennsylvania Justin Oakley, Monash University, Australia Kevin Outterson, Boston University, Boston Gregory Pence, University of Alabama at Birmingham Laura M. Purdy, Wells College, Aurora, New York James Rachels, Deceased Janet Radcliffe Richards, University of Oxford Bernard E. Rollin, Colorado State University Julian Savulescu, University of Oxford Udo Schüklenk, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario Michael J. Selgelid, The Australian National University, Canberra Daniel K. Sokol, Imperial College London Bonnie Steinbock, State University of New York Brian Stoffell, Flinders University, South Australia Janet L. Storch, University of Victoria, Canada Peter A. Sy, University of the Philippines, Quezon City Michael Tooley, University of Colorado at Boulder Verena Tschudin, University of Surrey, UK Wibren van der Burg, Erasmus University, Rotterdam Mary Warnock, Axford, Wiltshire, UK Mary Anne Warren, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California Daniel Wikler, Harvard University, Boston Dr Robert Young, La Trobe University, Melbourne xii xiii...

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
Lynn Clouder1
TL;DR: The authors argue that caring is a "threshold concept" by virtue of the "troublesome knowledge" with which students are confronted on meeting patients in practice, and suggest a number of ways in which students can be helped to move forward towards or through the threshold to a more cogent understanding of caring.
Abstract: This paper explores the ways in which student health professionals undergo a transformation in their sense of identity as they engage with caring discourses that underpin healthcare. I argue that caring is a ‘threshold concept’ by virtue of the ‘troublesome knowledge’ with which students are confronted on meeting patients in practice. When superimposed on commonsense understandings of caring, medical connotations of care and moral and ethical dilemmas challenge students to develop their own personal framework within which to operate. I suggest a number of ways in which students can be helped to move forward towards or through the threshold to a more cogent understanding of caring. Subsequent positioning in terms of caring discourses forms a facet of the students’ developing identities as healthcare professionals and therefore is a fundamental aspect of professional socialization.

169 citations


Cites background from "From Morality to Virtue"

  • ...To be described as ‘caring’ is praise in that it attributes admirable traits, definitive of the discourse of virtue (Slote, 1992)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that in a complex socio-political world, social work ethics needs to re-cast the moral identity of the social worker in terms of virtue ethics, the acquired inner qualities of humans, the possession of which, if applied in due measure, will typically contribute to the realization of the good life or "eudaimonia".
Abstract: Summary This article argues that in a complex socio-political world, social work ethics needs to re-cast the moral identity of the social worker in terms of virtue ethics. We review virtue theory’s Aristotelian foundations and criticisms of Kantian and utilitarian theory and show how they apply to social work. Subsequently we offer an account of a virtuebased social work that questions the validity of several models of practice currently fashionable. Virtue theory emphasizes the priority of the individual moral agent who has acquired virtues commensurate with the pursuit of a revisable conception of the good life—the well-being of all in a defined community. The virtues are the acquired inner qualities of humans—character—the possession of which, if applied in due measure, will typically contribute to the realization of the good life or ‘eudaimonia’. The role of the virtuous social worker is shown to be one that necessitates appropriate application of intellectual and practical virtues such as justice, reflection, perception, judgement, bravery, prudence, liberality and temperance. This ‘self-flourishing’ worker,

159 citations


Cites background from "From Morality to Virtue"

  • ...With similar implications, Slote runs the argument that if duties have a reference point, it is that of the person for whom a duty is performed and not the performer (Slote, 1997)....

    [...]

  • ...However, in the last few years a virtue literature has been circulating (Crisp and Slote, 1997; Statman, 1997a) as has a post-Thatcherite political lan- guage of citizenship, individual responsibility and the idea of a public ethics....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, a quantitative analysis of authors, schools, themes, and publications of virtue ethics in business and management literature is presented, with a focus on the most prolific authors, most cited authors, the most cited articles, and journals with the most virtue ethics publications.
Abstract: Virtue ethics is generally recognized as one of the three major schools of ethics, but is often waylaid by utilitarianism and deontology in business and management literature. EBSCO and ABI databases were used to look for articles in the Journal of Citation Reports publications between 1980 and 2011 containing the keywords ‘virtue ethics’, ‘virtue theory’, or ‘virtuousness’ in the abstract and ‘business’ or ‘management’ in the text. The search was refined to draw lists of the most prolific authors, the most cited authors, the most cited articles, and the journals with the most virtue ethics publications. This information allows one to chart how virtue ethics articles have evolved through the decades and to establish ‘schools’ or clusters of authors as well as clusters of themes. The results of this quantitative analysis of authors, ‘schools’, themes, and publications provide a foundation for the future study of virtue ethics in business and management, identifying its achievements and potentials.

135 citations


Cites background from "From Morality to Virtue"

  • ...Only passing references to Von Wright (1993), Slote (1992), Hursthouse (1999), and Swanton (2003) were found....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that the strategy of role-modeling, as explicated by the character education movement, is beset with three unsolved problems: an empirical problem of why this method is needed, a methodological problem of how students are to be inspired to emulate, and a substantive moral problem of what precisely should be taught.
Abstract: This article is about (1) the ancient (Aristotelian) emotional virtue of emulation, (2) some current character‐education inspired accounts of the use of role models in moral education and, most importantly, (3) the potential relevance of (1) for (2). The author argues that the strategy of role‐modelling, as explicated by the character‐education movement, is beset with three unsolved problems: an empirical problem of why this method is needed; a methodological problem of how students are to be inspired to emulation; and a substantive moral problem of what precisely should be taught. While the first of these three problems may perhaps be overlooked with impunity, the second and third problems stand in urgent need of rectification if role‐modelling is to retain its moral and educational import. After exploring Aristotle's notion of emulation, the author suggests that this rich and nuanced notion may hold the key to the solution of both problems. Such Aristotelian solutions are then spelled out and defended.

114 citations


Cites background from "From Morality to Virtue"

  • ...Both these types of neo-Aristotelianism quietly ignore the fact that for Aristotle standards for proper action and emotion are followed by the phronimos because they are morally appropriate, and not the other way round (Slote, 1992, p. 89)....

    [...]

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
16 Aug 2021-Religion
TL;DR: The Konstanz Method of Dilemma Discussion (KMDD) as discussed by the authors is one of the most effective methods that are designed to foster moral competence and promote tolerance and equality, regardless of cultural background, religion, or views.

5 citations

01 Oct 2004
TL;DR: The authors argues that virtue theory has gone into bankruptcy, and therefore, unless we can find a different foundation, it is a flawed doctrine to preach now, and argues that it is impossible to return to virtue theory.
Abstract: Recent illicit activity among professionals, politicians, and specifically among members of the business community has made scholars skeptical of the viability of traditional consequential and deontological theories. To correct this problem many advocate a return to virtue theory, a theory that focuses on character development and not just upon normative status of actions. Although such a return appears to have the tide of victory in its favor, it is necessary to make sure that there is well-authenticated evidence for such a return. Otherwise, how will we know whether we are just replacing one bad theory with another? In fact, in this essay, after I examine the metaphysical machinery needed for such a return, I argue that virtue theory has gone into bankruptcy, and therefore, unless we can find a different foundation, it is a flawed doctrine to preach now.

4 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
30 Nov 2017
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compare two contemporary moral theories, namely, virtue ethics and the ethics of care, and show that the former emphasises the crucial role of individual character in moral life, whereas the latter emphasizes the role of care in human relations.
Abstract: In this paper I compare two contemporary moral theories; virtue ethics and the ethics of care. They both reject traditional ethical positions – Kantian ethics and utilitarianism. Virtue ethics focuses on the question what person should I be, instead, as in the case of Kantian ethics and utilitarianism, what should I do. It holds that value concepts (good, value) in contrary to deontological concepts (duty, obligation) are fundamental in ethical theory. Ethics of care, in rejecting a position based on justice, emphasises the role of care in human relations. It concentrates on personal relationships like love, friendship and charity. Virtue ethics emphasises the crucial role of individual character in moral life, whereas ethics of care holds that relations between people based on attentiveness, responsiveness and respect are the most important in moral life.

3 citations