Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers
Citations
4,213 citations
Cites background or result from "Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy..."
...O ften tim es, D ependents preferred their "on-line" friends over their real life relationships due to the ease of anonymous communication and the extent of control in revealing personal information among other on-line users....
[...]
...…shows a significant discrepancy from the stereotypic profile of an "Internet addict" as a young, computer-savvy male (Young, 1996a) and is counter to previous research that has suggested males predominantly utilize and feel comfortable with information technologies (Busch, 1995; Shotton, 1991)....
[...]
914 citations
906 citations
Cites background or methods from "Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy..."
...Campbell (1988) and Wood (1986) both found that the number of component parts involved in completing a task and the sequential steps required to perform it successfully both had direct effects on the formation of SE perceptions....
[...]
...…of SLT to the development of training methods intended to enhance CSE appears to be increasingly attractive (Compeau and Higgins 1995b, Gist et al. 1989, Simon 1995, Henry and Stone 1995, Busch 1995, Martocchio and Webster 1992, Smith 1994, Hill et al. 1985, Martocchio and Dulebohn 1994)....
[...]
...Both Busch (1995) and Henry and Stone (1995) measured pre-test verbal persuasion (in the form of previous encouragement and management support, respectively) and found significant relationships between degree of verbal persuasion and subsequent formation of computer attitudes and levels of CSE....
[...]
...Campbell (1988) and Wood (1986) both found that the number of component parts involved in completing a task and the sequential steps required to perform it successfully both had direct effects on the formation of SE perceptions. Cervone (1985) demonstrated that when subjects were asked to focus on the more formidable aspects of a task, their self-efficacy was lowered....
[...]
...…to determine any significant differences across groups (Delcourt and Kinzie 1993, Murphy et al. 1989) to formal assessments of pre-test skill level intended to be used in comparison with other post-test measures (Henry and Stone 1994, Martocchio 1992, Ogletree and Williams 1990, Busch 1995)....
[...]
606 citations
562 citations
References
38,007 citations
"Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy..." refers background or result in this paper
...According to social learning theory, both the experience of success in performing a task and verbal persuasion will increase self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977 and 1982; Campbell & Hackett, 1986; Hackett & Campbell, 1987). Our results indicate that for the present study, at least encouragement from others was not a significant source of selfefficacy. An interesting question, which cannot be answered on the bases of this study, is whether computer attitudes have changed during the course and affected a change in self-efficacy. So far, the results indicate that computer attitude and selfefficacy are strongly correlated, that they represent different aspects of the personality and that gender differences are found in self-efficacy (complex tasks), and not in computer attitude. With regard to the other variables of this study, male students report more computer experience in computer games and programming than do female students. There are no significant gender differences with respect to previous experience in word processing and spreadsheet programs. This supports the results of Vasil, Hesketh and Podd (1987), and Clarke and Chambers (1989), and indicates that the use of word processing software and spreadsheet programs in high school and home situations gives male and female students the same degree of experience. With regard to encouragement men receive significantly more encouragement from friends and parents than do women. Clarke and Chambers (1989) could not find any gender differences in the amount of influence from significant others - the reason may be that the perceived amount of encouragement was very low....
[...]
...According to social learning theory, both the experience of success in performing a task and verbal persuasion will increase self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977 and 1982; Campbell & Hackett, 1986; Hackett & Campbell, 1987)....
[...]
...According to social learning theory, both the experience of success in performing a task and verbal persuasion will increase self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977 and 1982; Campbell & Hackett, 1986; Hackett & Campbell, 1987). Our results indicate that for the present study, at least encouragement from others was not a significant source of selfefficacy. An interesting question, which cannot be answered on the bases of this study, is whether computer attitudes have changed during the course and affected a change in self-efficacy. So far, the results indicate that computer attitude and selfefficacy are strongly correlated, that they represent different aspects of the personality and that gender differences are found in self-efficacy (complex tasks), and not in computer attitude. With regard to the other variables of this study, male students report more computer experience in computer games and programming than do female students. There are no significant gender differences with respect to previous experience in word processing and spreadsheet programs. This supports the results of Vasil, Hesketh and Podd (1987), and Clarke and Chambers (1989), and indicates that the use of word processing software and spreadsheet programs in high school and home situations gives male and female students the same degree of experience. With regard to encouragement men receive significantly more encouragement from friends and parents than do women. Clarke and Chambers (1989) could not find any gender differences in the amount of influence from significant others - the reason may be that the perceived amount of encouragement was very low. Chen (1986) found gender differences with respect to friends, but not to parents....
[...]
...According to social learning theory, both the experience of success in performing a task and verbal persuasion will increase self-efficacy (Bandura, 1977 and 1982; Campbell & Hackett, 1986; Hackett & Campbell, 1987). Our results indicate that for the present study, at least encouragement from others was not a significant source of selfefficacy. An interesting question, which cannot be answered on the bases of this study, is whether computer attitudes have changed during the course and affected a change in self-efficacy. So far, the results indicate that computer attitude and selfefficacy are strongly correlated, that they represent different aspects of the personality and that gender differences are found in self-efficacy (complex tasks), and not in computer attitude. With regard to the other variables of this study, male students report more computer experience in computer games and programming than do female students. There are no significant gender differences with respect to previous experience in word processing and spreadsheet programs. This supports the results of Vasil, Hesketh and Podd (1987), and Clarke and Chambers (1989), and indicates that the use of word processing software and spreadsheet programs in high school and home situations gives male and female students the same degree of experience. With regard to encouragement men receive significantly more encouragement from friends and parents than do women. Clarke and Chambers (1989) could not find any gender differences in the amount of influence from significant others - the reason may be that the perceived amount of encouragement was very low. Chen (1986) found gender differences with respect to friends, but not to parents. Hess and Miura (1985) found that encouragement may be given more to boys than to girls....
[...]
...Research supports propositions that self-efficacy will influence the choice of whether to engage in a task, the effort expended in performing it, and the persistence shown in accomplishing it (Bandura, 1977; Bandura & Schunk, 1981; Barling & Beattie, 1983; Bouffard-Bouchard, 1990; Brown, Lent & Larkin, 1989; Hackett & Betz, 1989)....
[...]
16,833 citations
14,898 citations
"Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy..." refers background in this paper
...Seeing others succeed or fail is a second source of information that can affect self-efficacy (Bandura, 1982; Gist, 1987; Gist, Schwoerer & Rosen, 1989; Schunk, 1981 and 1982)....
[...]
2,618 citations
1,563 citations
Additional excerpts
...…have significantly lower self-efficacy than male students regarding math-related and traditionally male-dominated subjects, including computer science (Betz & Hackett, 1981; Betz & Hackett, 1983; Hackett, 1985; Hackett & Betz, 1981; Lent, Brown & Larkin 1984 and 1985; Post-Kammer & Smith, 1985)....
[...]