Geochemistry of fluids discharged from mud volcanoes in SE Caspian Sea (Gorgan Plain, Iran)
Citations
[...]
428 citations
[...]
354 citations
138 citations
19 citations
18 citations
References
6,271 citations
"Geochemistry of fluids discharged f..." refers background in this paper
...Table 2), typical of a brine (Hem 1970)....
[...]
2,589 citations
"Geochemistry of fluids discharged f..." refers background in this paper
...…of pre-existing organic material (thermogenesis) and/or (ii) microbial activity (Bernard et al. 1978; Schoell 1980, 1983; Chung et al. 1988; Seewald et al. 1998; Whiticar 1999; Seewald 2003; Takai et al. 2008), the latter not being necessary related to any potential source rock (Schoell 1983)....
[...]
...…UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group between these two-genetic processes (Bernard et al. 1978; Schoell 1980, 1983; Chung et al. 1988; Whiticar 1999), since thermogenic gases have relatively high concentrations of ethane, propane, butane and pentane than those recorded in microbial…...
[...]
2,305 citations
"Geochemistry of fluids discharged f..." refers background in this paper
...The buried Mesozoic Kopeh Dagh formations, which outcrop at the eastern part of Gorgan plain, have up to 10-km thickness (Berberian and King 1981)....
[...]
1,166 citations
"Geochemistry of fluids discharged f..." refers background in this paper
...CO2 generated by anaerobic oxidation of petroleum or heavy hydrocarbons is consumed by methanotrophs (Pallasser 2000; Head et al. 2003; Jones et al. 2008; Milkov 2011, 2018)....
[...]
...…processes, such as anaerobic biodegradation of petroleum coupled with an addition of secondary microbial methane occurring at relatively shallow depth (Pallasser 2000; Etiope et al. 2009b; Milkov 2011, 2018), which may mask the pristine chemical and isotopic features of the primary gases....
[...]
...The residual 12C-depleted CO2 is highly indicative of secondary microbial methane formed during petroleum biodegradation (Milkov 2011, 2018)....
[...]
1,124 citations
"Geochemistry of fluids discharged f..." refers background in this paper
...CO2 generated by anaerobic oxidation of petroleum or heavy hydrocarbons is consumed by methanotrophs (Pallasser 2000; Head et al. 2003; Jones et al. 2008; Milkov 2011, 2018)....
[...]
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. What is the main source of gas in the Kopeh Dagh range?
The Kashafrud and Chaman Bid formations are the main source rocks and Tirgan (Lower Cretaceous) and Mozduran formation are the potential and main gas reservoirs in the Kopeh Dagh range, respectively (Robert et al. 2014).
Q3. What is the origin of methane and light hydrocarbons discharged from MVs?
Fluids uprising through deep-rooted feeding channels may also be stored in mud chambers located at intermediate-toshallow depth, giving rise to buried MVs that can be recognized with geophysical surveys (Deville et al. 2003; Mazzini et al. 2009).
Q4. What was the water composition of the MVs?
calcite, halite, muscovite, illite, albite, clinochlore and microcline were found in the mud samples for all the studied MVs.
Q5. What is the significance of the occurrence of O2 in deep-originated gase?
Considering that deep-originatedgases feeding MVs are O2-depleted, the occurrence of O2 (<3%) suggests some air contamination at shallow depth and/or during the gas sampling.
Q6. What is the common explanation for boron in a MV?
Since MVs mainly consist of smectite-rich mud (Fitts and Brown 1999), boron can be adsorbed by this clay mineral and then released to pore fluids through temperature-driven smectite-illite transformation during burial or tectonic processes (Colten-Bradley 1987; You et al. 1996).
Q7. What is the chemical composition of the water phase discharged from MVs?
Chemical and isotopic compositions of the water phase discharged from MVs are good tracer to identify type and possible source of fluid.
Q8. What is the effect of the chemical composition of the primary gases?
the original chemical and isotopic composition of deep-originated gas may be affected by post-genetic processes, such as anaerobic biodegradation of petroleum coupled with an addition of secondary microbial methane occurring at relatively shallow depth (Pallasser 2000; Etiope et al. 2009b; Milkov 2011, 2018), which may mask the pristine chemical and isotopic features of the primary gases.
Q9. What is the corresponding NH4+ concentration in the Gorgan Plain waters?
The presence of minerals belonging to the chlorite-group (clinochlore), mica and carbonate minerals recognized by XRD in the muds, can likely be representing a potential source of Mg2+, able to explain the high content of Mg recorded in these waters (White 1965).
Q10. What geological sequences are considered to be the probable source rocks for thermogenic gases?
The Maykop, Upper-Middle Miocene and Mesozoic deposits may be regarded as the probable source rocks for thermogenic gases, although the source rock/s producing thermogenic gas is still questionable due to the complexities and ambiguities in identifying the geological sequences beneath the Gorgan Plain.
Q11. What was the water sample from the iodine production well?
The water sample from the iodine production well was Na-Cl type and was characterized by relatively high concentration of Ca2+ (4,900 mg/L), Mg2+ (4,650 mg/L), Li (60.3 mg/L), NH4 + (423 mg/L) and SO4 2- (8,620 mg/L).
Q12. Why are the Na–Cl waters discharged by MVs?
The Na–Cl waters can be divided into two main groups: Type 1 waters fromGharenyaregh and Neftlijeh MVs showing relatively high Na+/Cl−, B/Cl− and Li/Cl− ratios and low Ca2+/Cl−, Mg2+/Cl− and K+/Cl− ratios, typically discharged by MVs due to interaction with marine sediments:
Q13. What was the concentration of light alkanes in the MVs?
Light alkanes (ethane, propane, i-butane and n-butane) had concentrations up to 5.79%, 0.89%, 0.35% and 0.22%, respectively (Supp. Table 1).
Q14. What is the origin of the gas discharged from MVs?
C1-C4 hydrocarbons were widely investigated to reveal the origin of gas discharged from fluid escape in sedimentary structures associated with various geologic settings (e.g. Delisle et al.
Q15. What is the effect of the MVs on the Mg2+/Cl?
this process causes a decrease in Mg2+/Cl− ratio, in contrast with the relatively high Mg2+/Cl− measured in these waters.
Q16. What was the method used to sample the MVs?
The first three MVs were sampled using a plastic funnel up-sidedown positioned above the bubbling sites and connected through a silicon tube to a pre-evacuated glass bottle equipped with a thorion valve (Vaselli et al. 2006).
Q17. What is the NH4+ concentration in the Gorgan Plain waters?
The relatively high concentrations of NH4 + shown by all the Gorgan Plain waters (19 to 310 mg/L; Supp.Table 2) were likely caused by degradation of organic N-bearing compounds or ion exchange processes with the associated hydrocarbons, as also documented in many waters associated with oilfields (Collins 1975), as well as those discharged from Turkmenistan MVs (Oppo et al. 2014).