scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Geological storage of CO2 in saline aquifers—A review of the experience from existing storage operations

TL;DR: The experience from CO2 injection at pilot projects (Frio, Ketzin, Nagaoka, US Regional Partnerships) and existing commercial operations (Sleipner, Snohvit, In Salah, acid-gas injection) demonstrates that CO2 geological storage in saline aquifers is technologically feasible.
About: This article is published in International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control.The article was published on 2010-07-01. It has received 528 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Carbon capture and storage (timeline).
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, various aspects of CCS are reviewed and discussed including the state of the art technologies for CO2 capture, separation, transport, storage, leakage, monitoring, and life cycle analysis.
Abstract: Global warming and climate change concerns have triggered global efforts to reduce the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) is considered a crucial strategy for meeting CO2 emission reduction targets. In this paper, various aspects of CCS are reviewed and discussed including the state of the art technologies for CO2 capture, separation, transport, storage, leakage, monitoring, and life cycle analysis. The selection of specific CO2 capture technology heavily depends on the type of CO2 generating plant and fuel used. Among those CO2 separation processes, absorption is the most mature and commonly adopted due to its higher efficiency and lower cost. Pipeline is considered to be the most viable solution for large volume of CO2 transport. Among those geological formations for CO2 storage, enhanced oil recovery is mature and has been practiced for many years but its economical viability for anthropogenic sources needs to be demonstrated. There are growing interests in CO2 storage in saline aquifers due to their enormous potential storage capacity and several projects are in the pipeline for demonstration of its viability. There are multiple hurdles to CCS deployment including the absence of a clear business case for CCS investment and the absence of robust economic incentives to support the additional high capital and operating costs of the whole CCS process.

2,181 citations


Cites background or result from "Geological storage of CO2 in saline..."

  • ...[144] conducted a similar study based on the experience from existing storage operations and presented similar conclusions as White et al....

    [...]

  • ...Large natural variation in CO2 values due to soil respiration, organic matter decomposition or peculiar climatic condition may affect the reliability of these techniques [144]....

    [...]

  • ...[144] and Global CCS Institute [87], and are summarized in Table 8....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the recent developments on the carbon capture and storage (CCS) methodologies from 2006 until now, focusing on the basic findings achieved in CCS operational projects.
Abstract: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assumes the warming of the climate system, associating the increase of global average temperature to the observed increase of the anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is considered the most important GHG, due to the dependence of world economies on fossil fuels, since their combustion processes are the most important sources of this gas. CO 2 concentrations are increasing in the last decades mainly due to the increase of anthropogenic emissions. The processes involving CO 2 capture and storage is gaining attention on the scientific community as an alternative for decreasing CO 2 emission, reducing its concentration in ambient air. However, several technological, economical and environmental issues as well as safety problems remain to be solved, such as the following needs: increase of CO 2 capture efficiency, reduction of process costs, and verification of environmental sustainability of CO 2 storage. This paper aims to review the recent developments (from 2006 until now) on the carbon capture and storage (CCS) methodologies. Special attention was focused on the basic findings achieved in CCS operational projects.

608 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide a review of the geomechanics and modeling of geOMEchanics associated with geologic carbon storage (GCS), focusing on storage in deep sedimentary formations, in particular saline aquifers.
Abstract: This paper provides a review of the geomechanics and modeling of geomechanics associated with geologic carbon storage (GCS), focusing on storage in deep sedimentary formations, in particular saline aquifers. The paper first introduces the concept of storage in deep sedimentary formations, the geomechanical processes and issues related with such an operation, and the relevant geomechanical modeling tools. This is followed by a more detailed review of geomechanical aspects, including reservoir stress-strain and microseismicity, well integrity, caprock sealing performance, and the potential for fault reactivation and notable (felt) seismic events. Geomechanical observations at current GCS field deployments, mainly at the In Salah CO2 storage project in Algeria, are also integrated into the review. The In Salah project, with its injection into a relatively thin, low-permeability sandstone is an excellent analogue to the saline aquifers that might be used for large scale GCS in parts of Northwest Europe, the U.S. Midwest, and China. Some of the lessons learned at In Salah related to geomechanics are discussed, including how monitoring of geomechanical responses is used for detecting subsurface geomechanical changes and tracking fluid movements, and how such monitoring and geomechanical analyses have led to preventative changes in the injection parameters. Recently, the importance of geomechanics has become more widely recognized among GCS stakeholders, especially with respect to the potential for triggering notable (felt) seismic events and how such events could impact the long-term integrity of a CO2 repository (as well as how it could impact the public perception of GCS). As described in the paper, to date, no notable seismic event has been reported from any of the current CO2 storage projects, although some unfelt microseismic activities have been detected by geophones. However, potential future commercial GCS operations from large power plants will require injection at a much larger scale. For such large-scale injections, a staged, learn-as-you-go approach is recommended, involving a gradual increase of injection rates combined with continuous monitoring of geomechanical changes, as well as siting beneath a multiple layered overburden for multiple flow barrier protection, should an unexpected deep fault reactivation occur.

501 citations


Cites background from "Geological storage of CO2 in saline..."

  • ...Recent experience from CO2 injection at a number of pilot projects, as well as a few ongoing commercial projects demonstrates that CO2 geological storage in deep sedimentary formations is technologically feasible (Michael et al., 2010)....

    [...]

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors report the results of an experimental investigation into the multiphase flow properties of CO2 and water in four distinct sandstone rocks: a Berea sandstone and three reservoir rocks from formations into which CO2 injection is either currently taking place or is planned.
Abstract: [1] We report the results of an experimental investigation into the multiphase flow properties of CO2 and water in four distinct sandstone rocks: a Berea sandstone and three reservoir rocks from formations into which CO2 injection is either currently taking place or is planned. Drainage relative permeability and residual gas saturations were measured at 50 � C and 9 MPa pore pressure using the steady state method in a horizontal core flooding apparatus with fluid distributions observed using x-ray computed tomography. Absolute permeability, capillary pressure curves, and petrological studies were performed on each sample. Relative permeability in the four samples is consistent with general characteristics of drainage in strongly water-wet rocks. Measurements in the Berea sample are also consistent with past measurements in Berea sandstones using both CO2/brine and oil/water fluid systems. Maximum observed saturations and permeabilities are limited by the capillary pressure that can be achieved in the experiment and do not represent endpoint values. It is likely that maximum saturations observed in other studies are limited in the same way and there is no indication that low endpoint relative permeabilities are a characteristic of the CO2/water system. Residual trapping in three of the rocks is consistent with trapping in strongly water-wet systems, and the results from the Berea sample are again consistent with observations in past studies. This confirms that residual trapping can play a major role in the immobilization of CO2 injected into the subsurface. In the Mt. Simon sandstone, a nonmonotonic relationship between initial and residual CO2 saturations is indicative of a rock that is mixed or intermediate wet, and further investigations should be performed to establish the wetting properties of illite-rich rocks. The combined results suggest that the petrophysical properties of the multiphase flow of CO2/water through siliciclastic rocks is for the most part typical of a strongly water-wet system and that analog fluids and conditions may be used to characterize these properties. Further investigation is required to identify the wetting properties of illite-rich rocks during imbibition processes.

466 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jun 2013-Fuel
TL;DR: In this paper, the progress made in CO2 capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is reviewed, and new concepts such as adsorption using dry regenerable solid sorbents as well as functional ionic liquids (ILs) for CO 2 capture are thoroughly discussed.

369 citations

References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A set of 15 criteria, with several classes each, has been developed for the assessment and ranking of sedimentary basins in terms of their suitability for CO2 sequestration as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: Sedimentary basins are suitable to different degrees for CO2 geological sequestration as a result of various intrinsic and extrinsic characteristics, of which the geothermal regime is one of the most important. Warm basins are less favorable for CO2 sequestration than cold basins because of reduced capacity in terms of CO2 mass, and because of higher CO2 buoyancy, which drives the upward CO2 migration. A set of 15 criteria, with several classes each, has been developed for the assessment and ranking of sedimentary basins in terms of their suitability for CO2 sequestration. Using a parametric normalization procedure, a basin's individual scores are summed to a total score using weights that express the relative importance of different criteria. The total score is ranked to determine the most suitable basin or region thereof for the geological sequestration of CO2. The method is extremely flexible in that it allows changes in the functions that express the importance of various classes for any given criterion, and in the weights that express the relative importance of various criteria. Examples of application are given for Canada's case and for the Alberta basin in Canada.

660 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2006-Geology
TL;DR: In this article, 1600 t of CO2 were injected at 1500 m depth into a 24m-thick sandstone section of the Frio Formation, a regional brine and oil reservoir in the U.S Gulf Coast.
Abstract: To investigate the potential for the geologic storage of CO2 in saline sedimentary aquifers, 1600 t of CO2 were injected at 1500 m depth into a 24-m-thick sandstone section of the Frio Formation, a regional brine and oil reservoir in the U.S. Gulf Coast. Fluid samples obtained from the injection and observation wells before CO2 injection showed a Na-CaCl‐type brine with 93,000 mg/L total dissolved solids (TDS) at near saturation with CH4 at reservoir conditions. Following CO2 breakthrough, samples showed sharp drops in pH (6.5‐5.7), pronounced increases in alkalinity (100‐3000 mg/L as HCO3) and Fe (30‐1100 mg/L), and significant shifts in the isotopic compositions of H2O, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and CH4. Geochemical modeling indicates that brine pH would have dropped lower but for the buffering by dissolution of carbonate and iron oxyhydroxides. This rapid dissolution of carbonate and other minerals could ultimately create pathways in the rock seals or well cements for CO2 and brine leakage. Dissolution of minerals, especially iron oxyhydroxides, could mobilize toxic trace metals and, where residual oil or suitable organics are present, the injected CO2 could also mobilize toxic organic compounds. Environmental impacts could be major if large brine volumes with mobilized toxic metals and organics migrated into potable groundwater. The d 18 O values for brine and CO2 samples indicate that supercritical CO2 comprises ;50% of pore-fluid volume ;6 mo after the end of injection. Postinjection sampling, coupled with geochemical modeling, indicates that the brine gradually will return to its preinjection composition.

490 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: A review of the water-alternating-gas (WAG) field experience can be found in the literature today from the first reported WAG in 1957 in Canada and up to new experience from the North Sea as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract: In recent years there has been an increasing interest in water-alternating-gas (WAG) processes, both miscible and immiscible. WAG injection is an oil recovery method initially aimed to improve sweep efficiency during gas injection. In some recent applications produced hydrocarbon gas has been re-injected in water injection wells with the aim of improving oil recovery and pressure maintenance. Oil recovery by WAG has been attributed to contact of unswept zones, especially recovery of attic or cellar oil by exploiting the segregation of gas to the top or accumulating of water towards the bottom. Since the residual oil after gas flooding is normally lower than the residual oil after water flooding, and three-phase zones may obtain lower remaining oil saturation, water-alternating-gas has potential for increased microscopic displacement efficiency. WAG injection, thus, can lead to improved oil recovery by combining better mobility control and contacting unswept zones, and also leading to improved microscopical displacement. This study is a review of the WAG field experience as it is found in the literature today from the first reported WAG in 1957 in Canada and up to new experience from the North Sea. About 60 fields have been reviewed. Both onshore and offshore projects have been included, as well as WAG with hydrocarbon or non-hydrocarbon gases. Wellspacing is very different from onshore projects (where fine patterns often are applied) to offshore projects (well spacing in the order of 1000 meters). For the fields reviewed, a common trend for the successful injections is an increased oil recovery in the range of 5-10 per cent of the OIIP. Very few field trials have been reported unsuccessful, but operational problems are often comment Though, the injectivity and production problems are generall not detrimental for the WAG process, special attention been given to breakthrough of injected phases (water or gas Improved oil recovery by WAG is discussed as influenced b rock type, injection strategy, miscible/immiscible gas, an well spacing.

446 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum (www.cslforum.org) as mentioned in this paper has proposed a set of guidelines for estimation of CO2 storage capacity, which will greatly assist future deliberations by government and industry on the appropriateness of geological storage in different geological settings.

414 citations