기독교 사역과 Leadership
Citations
93 citations
Cites background from "기독교 사역과 Leadership"
...For example, consider the difference between the ‘‘functions’’ approach of Goudan (1970), which emphasizes the characteristics of leaders, and the ‘‘integrative’’ approach of Gibb (1969), which emphasizes leader-follower relations....
[...]
92 citations
92 citations
92 citations
Cites background from "기독교 사역과 Leadership"
...Although there are multiple disparate voices in the discussion there is some long standing general agreement that ‘leadership’ is important in both developing and sustaining the climate and condition for innovation to occur (Bass & Riggio, 2006; Burns, 1978)....
[...]
92 citations
Cites background from "기독교 사역과 Leadership"
...859: “ratio oritur in umbra intelligentiae”; Gottfredson, 1997; Schofer & Meyer, 2005, p. 917: “rationalization fueled by higher educational expansion”). According to Lipset (1960), education “broadens man's outlook, enables him to understand the need for norms of tolerance, restrains him from adhering to extremist doctrines, and increases his capacity to make rational electoral choices” (p. 54), and “The higher one's education, the more likely one is to believe in democratic values and support democratic practices.” (p. 57). Lipset postulated that these individual-level effects of education (tolerance, moderation of political positions, positive attitudes towards democratic values, ability for rational decisions) influence the political culture of nations. Two relevant effects of education and cognitive ability on politics could be distinguished: a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information processing etc.) and an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on cognitive ability (cognitive development being a prerequisite for moral development) and probably the other way round (a willingness to think and learn furthers cognitive competences). A similar position is held by the OECD (2000), which postulates an influence of education on the quality of voting decisions and intensity of political participation: “People with more schooling are likely to make more informed choices when voting and to participate more actively in their communities....
[...]
...859: “ratio oritur in umbra intelligentiae”; Gottfredson, 1997; Schofer & Meyer, 2005, p. 917: “rationalization fueled by higher educational expansion”). According to Lipset (1960), education “broadens man's outlook, enables him to understand the need for norms of tolerance, restrains him from adhering to extremist doctrines, and increases his capacity to make rational electoral choices” (p....
[...]
...859: “ratio oritur in umbra intelligentiae”; Gottfredson, 1997; Schofer & Meyer, 2005, p. 917: “rationalization fueled by higher educational expansion”). According to Lipset (1960), education “broadens man's outlook, enables him to understand the need for norms of tolerance, restrains him from adhering to extremist doctrines, and increases his capacity to make rational electoral choices” (p. 54), and “The higher one's education, the more likely one is to believe in democratic values and support democratic practices.” (p. 57). Lipset postulated that these individual-level effects of education (tolerance, moderation of political positions, positive attitudes towards democratic values, ability for rational decisions) influence the political culture of nations. Two relevant effects of education and cognitive ability on politics could be distinguished: a cognitive effect (competence to make rational choices, better information processing etc.) and an ethical effect (support of democratic values, freedom, human rights etc.), which itself depends on cognitive ability (cognitive development being a prerequisite for moral development) and probably the other way round (a willingness to think and learn furthers cognitive competences). A similar position is held by the OECD (2000), which postulates an influence of education on the quality of voting decisions and intensity of political participation: “People with more schooling are likely to make more informed choices when voting and to participate more actively in their communities.” (p. 81) Simpson (1997) stressed not only the relevance of education, but pointed to cognitive abilities as the central mechanism (“information-processing-capacity” or “cognitive capacity”; p....
[...]
...People prefer to elect persons as leaders who are about 20 IQ points more intelligent than themselves, but not more (Gibb, 1969), and the intelligence of leaders is correlated with their political success and moral standards....
[...]
References
5,812 citations
5,183 citations
3,577 citations
3,547 citations
2,836 citations