Global environmental change III: Closing the gap between knowledge and action
Citations
488 citations
315 citations
Cites background from "Global environmental change III: Cl..."
...been diverted away from the social and cultural norms, practices and power relations that drive environmental problems in the first place (O’Brien, 2012)....
[...]
310 citations
310 citations
238 citations
References
12,541 citations
2,934 citations
"Global environmental change III: Cl..." refers background in this paper
...Indeed, much has already been written on the science-policy interface, the role of boundary organizations, the communication of science, and the emergence of post-normal and even ‘post’ post-normal science (Cash et al., 2003; Moser and Dilling, 2011; Ravetz, 2006; Vogel et al., 2007)....
[...]
2,113 citations
2,107 citations
"Global environmental change III: Cl..." refers background in this paper
...(Brito and Stafford Smith, 2012) This is by no means a new idea; solutionsoriented approaches to science have been promoted in literatures ranging from sustainability science to action research (Kates et al., 2001; Reason and Bradbury, 2006)....
[...]
1,944 citations
"Global environmental change III: Cl..." refers background in this paper
...…with a social practices approach, with the latter challenging the dominant paradigm and hence ‘doomed to be forever marginal’ in a world where systems, structures, and institutions have been developed to realize competing goals that are largely incompatible with sustainability (Shove, 2010: 1283)....
[...]
...…has been long questioned by researchers, it is continually reproduced, based on the assumption that if people just knew, they would of course do something – and, since they are not, there is a need for policies that influence attitudes, behaviors, and choices (see Norgaard, 2011; Shove, 2010)....
[...]
...Yet, although the linear model of translating knowledge into action has been long questioned by researchers, it is continually reproduced, based on the assumption that if people just knew, they would of course do something – and, since they are not, there is a need for policies that influence attitudes, behaviors, and choices (see Norgaard, 2011; Shove, 2010)....
[...]
...Reviewing policy-related reports and the models of change upon which they are based, Shove (2010) critiques the widespread focus on attitude, behavior, and choice (ABC) as a model for climate change policy....
[...]
...An alternative model of social change, she argues, involves a weakening of the contemporary rules of the game, a questioning of the status quo, and the introduction of more sustainable regimes into all domains of daily life (Shove, 2010)....
[...]