scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Global Gender Gap Report

About: The article was published on 2010-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 585 citations till now.

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

The
Global Gender
Gap Report
Ricardo Hausmann, Harvard University
Laura D. Tyson, University of California, Berkeley
Saadia Zahidi, World Economic Forum
2010

World Economic Forum
Geneva, Switzerland 2010
The Global Gender Gap
Report 2010
Ricardo Hausmann, Harvard University
Laura D. Tyson, University of California, Berkeley
Saadia Zahidi, World Economic Forum

The Global Gender Gap Report 2010 is
published by the World Economic Forum. The
Global Gender Gap Index 2010 is the result of
collaboration with faculty at Harvard University
and the University of California, Berkeley.
AT THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
Professor Klaus Schwab
Founder and Executive Chairman
Saadia Zahidi
Director, Constituent Communities
Yasmina Bekhouche
Project Associate, Women Leaders and Gender
Parity Programme
Marc Cuénod
Team Coordinator, Constituent Communities
Eimear Farrell
Community Manager, Constituent Communities
AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY
Professor Ricardo Hausmann
Director, Center for International Development
AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY
Professor Laura D. Tyson
S.K. and Angela Chan Professor of Global
Management
Thank you to Hope Steele for her superb
copyediting work and Neil Weinberg for his
excellent interior graphic design and layout.
We are very grateful to Kamal Kamaoui and the
World Economic Forum’s Publications team for
their invaluable collaboration on the production
of this
Report.
In addition we extend a special thank you to
Miguel Perez at the World Economic Forum for
his vital contribution to programming related to
index calculations and country profiles.
The terms
country and nation as used in this
report do not in all cases refer to a territorial
entity that is a state as understood by
international law and practice. The term covers
well-defined, geographically self-contained
economic areas that may not be states but
for which statistical data are maintained on a
separate and independent basis.
World Economic Forum
91-93 route de la Capite
CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva
Switzerland
Tel.: +41 (0)22 869 1212
Fax: +41 (0)22 786 2744
E-mail: contact@weforum.org
www.weforum.org
© 2010 World Economic Forum
All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced
or transmitted in any form or by any means,
including photocopying and recording, or by
any information storage and retrieval system.
ISBN-92-95044-89-4
ISBN-978-92-95044-89-0

Preface.........................................................................................................v
by Klaus Schwab and Saadia Zahidi
PART 1: MEASURING THE GLOBAL GENDER GAP 1
The Global Gender Gap Index 2010......................................3
by Ricardo Hausmann, Harvard University
Laura D. Tyson, University of California, Berkeley
Saadia Zahidi, World Economic Forum
Appendix A: Tracking the Gender Gap over Time...........................35
Appendix B: Regional and Income Group
Classifications, 2010......................................................................39
Appendix C: The Spread of Minimum and Maximum
Values by Indicator........................................................................41
PART 2: COUNTRY PROFILES 43
List of Countries .....................................................................45
User’s Guide: How Country Profiles Work........................47
by Yasmina Bekhouche and Marc Cuénod, World Economic Forum
Country Profiles......................................................................52
About the Authors .................................................................................321
Acknowledgements..............................................................................323
Contents


Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: The behavior of women and men varies greatly depending on situations, cultures, and historical periods as discussed by the authors, and this flexibility emerges as men and women tailor their division of labor to local ecological and socioeconomic demands.
Abstract: The behavior of women and men varies greatly depending on situations, cultures, and historical periods. This flexibility emerges as men and women tailor their division of labor to local ecological and socioeconomic demands. The resulting division is supported by childhood socialization practices that, in interaction with sex differences in child temperament, help boys and girls to develop psychologies suited to their likely adult activities. Although responsive to local conditions, the division of labor is constrained by women's childbearing and nursing of infants and men's size and strength. Because these biological characteristics influence the efficient performance of many activities in society, they underlie central tendencies in the division of labor as well as its variability across situations, cultures, and history. Gender roles—that is, shared beliefs about the traits of women and men—track the division of labor because people infer these traits from their observations of the sexes’ behaviors. Social perceivers often essentialize these traits by regarding them as inherent in the biology or social experience of women and men. Gender role expectations, which tend to be consensual within cultures, influence behavior through proximal social psychological and biological processes, whereby (a) other people encourage gender-typical behavior and individuals conform to their own gender identities and (b) hormonal, reward, and cardiovascular mechanisms enable masculine and feminine behaviors.

497 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight the negative effect of COVID-19 risk on tourists and highlight the importance of tourism as a health-protective behavior. Based on the frameworks of the Health Belief Model and the extended...
Abstract: This study highlights ‘untact’ tourism as a health-protective behaviour stemming from individuals’ perceptions of COVID-19 risk. Based on the frameworks of the Health Belief Model and the extended ...

405 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is concluded that publication bias might seriously distort the literature on the effects of stereotype threat among schoolgirls and proposes a large replication study to provide a less biased effect size estimate.

255 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This paper explored gender differences in preferences for competition and risk among children aged 912 in Colombia and Sweden, two countries differing in gender equality according to macro indices, and found that boys and girls are equally competitive in all tasks and all measures in Colombia.
Abstract: We explore gender differences in preferences for competition and risk among children aged 912 in Colombia and Sweden, two countries differing in gender equality according to macro indices. We include four types of tasks that vary in gender stereotyping when looking at competitiveness: running, skipping rope, math and word search. We find that boys and girls are equally competitive in all tasks and all measures in Colombia. Unlike the consistent results in Colombia, the results in Sweden are mixed, with some indication of girls being more competitive than boys in some tasks in terms of performance change, whereas boys are more likely to choose to compete in general. Boys in both countries are more risk taking than girls, with a smaller gender gap in Sweden.

218 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors showed that the relation between sex differences in PISA achievement and national measures of gender equality is not consistent across assessments, and several of the positive findings are confounded by outliers.

197 citations