Growth paths and survival chances: an application of Gambler's Ruin theory
Citations
291 citations
Cites background from "Growth paths and survival chances: ..."
...…to compete on par with incumbents (~10 years); growth is rarely persistent (Holzl, 2013) and is approximately as persistent as a random coin toss (Coad et al, 2013); adjustment costs are very high (and penalise large scale entry and rapid post-entry growth); and as firms get both older and…...
[...]
...Recognizing that the median entrepreneurial start-up is likely to be closer to a muppet than a gazelle also helps explain a number of stylized facts in industrial dynamics: market entry is common (particularly for smaller firms) despite low survival rates and the high positive correlation between entry and exit (suggesting it drives churn rather than growth); growth is difficult and it can take a long time for entrants to compete on par with incumbents ( 10 years); growth is rarely persistent (Ho lzl, 2013) and is approximately as persistent as a random coin toss (Coad et al., 2013); adjustment costs are high (and penalize large scale entry and rapid postentry growth); and as firms get both older and larger their survival improves (Geroski, 1995; Stam, 2010)....
[...]
251 citations
Cites background from "Growth paths and survival chances: ..."
...…temporarily; Schumpeter, 1934) and their ability to escape competition (Nelson and Winter, 1982; Porter, 1980); (ii) reduces the costs of production (Cohen and Klepper, 1996a, 1996b; Nelson andWinter, 1982); (iii) creates dynamic capabilities for the SMEs (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000; Teece et…...
[...]
...…enhances firms' market power (Schumpeter, 1934), improve their ability to escape competition (Porter, 1980), reduce their production costs (Cohen and Klepper, 1996a, 1996b), improve dynamic capabilities (Teece et al., 1997), and lead to enhanced absorptive capacity (Zahra and George,…...
[...]
193 citations
177 citations
176 citations
Cites background from "Growth paths and survival chances: ..."
...…it is argued that the decision and outcome of growth for entrepreneurial firms could lie within the entrepreneur level (Westhead and Wright, 2011; Wright and Stiliani, 2012), or even be modelled as a random process (Coad et al., 2013), which may be less affected by macroeconomic conditions....
[...]
...Moreover, it is argued that the decision and outcome of growth for entrepreneurial firms could lie within the entrepreneur level (Westhead and Wright, 2011; Wright and Stiliani, 2012), or even be modelled as a random process (Coad et al., 2013), which may be less affected by macroeconomic conditions....
[...]
References
37,124 citations
27,902 citations
23,353 citations
14,137 citations
8,623 citations