scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

Daniel J. Klionsky, +2983 more
- 08 Feb 2021 - 
- Vol. 17, Iss: 1, pp 1-382
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagy in major human diseases

Daniel J. Klionsky, +71 more
- 01 Oct 2021 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagy in metabolic disease and ageing.

TL;DR: The role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases associated with or occurring in the context of ageing, including insulin resistance, T2DM and sarcopenic obesity, was discussed in this article.
Journal ArticleDOI

The SARS-CoV-2 protein ORF3a inhibits fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes

TL;DR: In this article, the authors systematically screened 28 viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and identified that ORF3a strongly inhibited autophagic flux by blocking the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

The STING1 network regulates autophagy and cell death.

TL;DR: The latest advances in the understanding of the regulating mechanisms and signaling pathways of STING1 in autophagy and cell death are outlined, which may shed light on new targets for therapeutic interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Akt inhibition promotes autophagy and sensitizes PTEN-null tumors to lysosomotropic agents

TL;DR: It is shown that silencing Akt1 alone, or any combination of Akt isoforms, can suppress the growth of tumors established from phosphatase and tensin homologue–null human cancer cells, and suggests that blocking lysosomal degradation can be detrimental to cancer cell survival when autophagy is activated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagy proteins regulate the secretory component of osteoclastic bone resorption

TL;DR: It is shown that proteins essential for autophagy, including Atg5, Atg7, AtG4B, and LC3, are important for generating the osteoclast ruffled border, the secretory function of osteoclasts, and bone resorption in vitro and in–vivo.
Journal ArticleDOI

An Atg1/Atg13 Complex with Multiple Roles in TOR-mediated Autophagy Regulation

TL;DR: Atg1-Atg13 complexes function at multiple levels to mediate and adjust nutrient-dependent autophagic signaling, and it is shown that knockout of Atg1 or Atg13 results in a similar, selective defect in autophagy in response to TOR inactivation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sestrins Activate Nrf2 by Promoting p62-Dependent Autophagic Degradation of Keap1 and Prevent Oxidative Liver Damage

TL;DR: Sesn1 and Sesn2 interact with the Nrf2 suppressor Keap1, the autophagy substrate p62, and the ubiquitin ligase Rbx1 and it is shown that the antioxidant function of Sesns is mediated through activation of NRF2 in a manner reliant on p62-dependent autophagic degradation of Keap 1.
Related Papers (5)

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

Daniel J. Klionsky, +1287 more
- 01 Apr 2012 - 

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

Daniel J. Klionsky, +2522 more
- 21 Jan 2016 - 
Trending Questions (2)
How long does it take for body to enter autophagy?

Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms.

What does autophagy do Reddit?

Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway.