scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

Daniel J. Klionsky, +2983 more
- 08 Feb 2021 - 
- Vol. 17, Iss: 1, pp 1-382
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagy in major human diseases

Daniel J. Klionsky, +71 more
- 01 Oct 2021 - 
TL;DR: In this paper, preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Autophagy in metabolic disease and ageing.

TL;DR: The role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases associated with or occurring in the context of ageing, including insulin resistance, T2DM and sarcopenic obesity, was discussed in this article.
Journal ArticleDOI

The SARS-CoV-2 protein ORF3a inhibits fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes

TL;DR: In this article, the authors systematically screened 28 viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and identified that ORF3a strongly inhibited autophagic flux by blocking the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

The STING1 network regulates autophagy and cell death.

TL;DR: The latest advances in the understanding of the regulating mechanisms and signaling pathways of STING1 in autophagy and cell death are outlined, which may shed light on new targets for therapeutic interventions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Lysosomal killing of Mycobacterium mediated by ubiquitin-derived peptides is enhanced by autophagy

TL;DR: A mechanism for killing Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the lysosomal compartment through the activity of peptides generated by the hydrolysis of ubiquitin is described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cleaning Up: ER-Associated Degradation to the Rescue

TL;DR: The endoplasmic-reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) as mentioned in this paper is a special case of this process, as aberrant polypeptides are recognized and returned to the cytoplasm for proteasomal degradation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Expression of the autophagy substrate SQSTM1/p62 is restored during prolonged starvation depending on transcriptional upregulation and autophagy-derived amino acids.

TL;DR: The results suggest that the expression level of SQSTM1 in starved cells is determined by at least 3 factors: autophagic degradation, transcriptional upregulation, and availability of lysosomal-derived amino acids.
Journal ArticleDOI

p62/SQSTM1: A Missing Link between Protein Aggregates and the Autophagy Machinery

TL;DR: P62/SQSTM1 may link the recognition of polyubiquitinated protein aggregates to the autophagy machinery, and possible implications of these findings are discussed and some questions for further investigation are raised.
Related Papers (5)

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

Daniel J. Klionsky, +1287 more
- 01 Apr 2012 - 

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

Daniel J. Klionsky, +2522 more
- 21 Jan 2016 - 
Trending Questions (2)
How long does it take for autophagy to start Reddit?

Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms.

What does autophagy do Reddit?

Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway.