scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
Journal ArticleDOI

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

08 Feb 2021-Autophagy (Landes Bioscience)-Vol. 17, Iss: 1, pp 1-382
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes.
Abstract: In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
University of Michigan1, Cornell University2, University of Pennsylvania3, University of Massachusetts Medical School4, University of Naples Federico II5, Baylor College of Medicine6, Spanish National Research Council7, Complutense University of Madrid8, New York University9, Boston Children's Hospital10, University of Rome Tor Vergata11, NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital12, University of Pittsburgh13, University of Paris14, French Institute of Health and Medical Research15, National University of Cuyo16, Albert Einstein College of Medicine17, University of New Mexico18, Goethe University Frankfurt19, Weizmann Institute of Science20, University of Turku21, Sapienza University of Rome22, Virginia Commonwealth University23, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital24, Discovery Institute25, University of Copenhagen26, University of Tromsø27, Eötvös Loránd University28, Merck & Co.29, University of Freiburg30, Babraham Institute31, University of South Australia32, University of Adelaide33, University of Oviedo34, University of Chicago35, University of Graz36, National Institutes of Health37, City University of New York38, Queens College39, University of Tokyo40, University of Zurich41, University of British Columbia42, Austrian Academy of Sciences43, University of California, San Francisco44, Russian Academy of Sciences45, University Medical Center Groningen46, University of Cambridge47, University of Glasgow48, Rutgers University49, University of Padua50, Kazan Federal University51, University of Bern52, University of Oxford53, Oslo University Hospital54, University of Oslo55, Foundation for Research & Technology – Hellas56, University of Crete57, Francis Crick Institute58, Osaka University59, Harvard University60, Chinese Academy of Sciences61, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai62, Shanghai Jiao Tong University63, Karolinska Institutet64
TL;DR: In this paper, preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.
Abstract: Autophagy is a core molecular pathway for the preservation of cellular and organismal homeostasis. Pharmacological and genetic interventions impairing autophagy responses promote or aggravate disease in a plethora of experimental models. Consistently, mutations in autophagy-related processes cause severe human pathologies. Here, we review and discuss preclinical data linking autophagy dysfunction to the pathogenesis of major human disorders including cancer as well as cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, metabolic, pulmonary, renal, infectious, musculoskeletal, and ocular disorders.

365 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that SARS-CoV-2 infection modulates cellular metabolism and limits autophagy, and identify druggable host pathways for virus inhibition.
Abstract: Viruses manipulate cellular metabolism and macromolecule recycling processes like autophagy. Dysregulated metabolism might lead to excessive inflammatory and autoimmune responses as observed in severe and long COVID-19 patients. Here we show that SARS-CoV-2 modulates cellular metabolism and reduces autophagy. Accordingly, compound-driven induction of autophagy limits SARS-CoV-2 propagation. In detail, SARS-CoV-2-infected cells show accumulation of key metabolites, activation of autophagy inhibitors (AKT1, SKP2) and reduction of proteins responsible for autophagy initiation (AMPK, TSC2, ULK1), membrane nucleation, and phagophore formation (BECN1, VPS34, ATG14), as well as autophagosome-lysosome fusion (BECN1, ATG14 oligomers). Consequently, phagophore-incorporated autophagy markers LC3B-II and P62 accumulate, which we confirm in a hamster model and lung samples of COVID-19 patients. Single-nucleus and single-cell sequencing of patient-derived lung and mucosal samples show differential transcriptional regulation of autophagy and immune genes depending on cell type, disease duration, and SARS-CoV-2 replication levels. Targeting of autophagic pathways by exogenous administration of the polyamines spermidine and spermine, the selective AKT1 inhibitor MK-2206, and the BECN1-stabilizing anthelmintic drug niclosamide inhibit SARS-CoV-2 propagation in vitro with IC50 values of 136.7, 7.67, 0.11, and 0.13 μM, respectively. Autophagy-inducing compounds reduce SARS-CoV-2 propagation in primary human lung cells and intestinal organoids emphasizing their potential as treatment options against COVID-19. Viruses manipulate host cell pathways to support infection. Here the authors show that SARS-CoV-2 infection modulates cellular metabolism and limits autophagy, and identify druggable host pathways for virus inhibition.

140 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases associated with or occurring in the context of ageing, including insulin resistance, T2DM and sarcopenic obesity, was discussed in this article.
Abstract: Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved, lysosome-dependent catabolic process whereby cytoplasmic components, including damaged organelles, protein aggregates and lipid droplets, are degraded and their components recycled. Autophagy has an essential role in maintaining cellular homeostasis in response to intracellular stress; however, the efficiency of autophagy declines with age and overnutrition can interfere with the autophagic process. Therefore, conditions such as sarcopenic obesity, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that are characterized by metabolic derangement and intracellular stresses (including oxidative stress, inflammation and endoplasmic reticulum stress) also involve the accumulation of damaged cellular components. These conditions are prevalent in ageing populations. For example, sarcopenia is an age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength that is involved in the pathogenesis of both insulin resistance and T2DM, particularly in elderly people. Impairment of autophagy results in further aggravation of diabetes-related metabolic derangements in insulin target tissues, including the liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, as well as in pancreatic β-cells. This Review summarizes the role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases associated with or occurring in the context of ageing, including insulin resistance, T2DM and sarcopenic obesity, and describes its potential as a therapeutic target. The cellular consequences of dysfunctional autophagy contribute to numerous diseases. In this Review, Kitada and Koya consider the relationship between impaired autophagy and age-related metabolic derangements, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus and sarcopenic obesity, and discuss candidate autophagy-based therapies.

109 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors systematically screened 28 viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and identified that ORF3a strongly inhibited autophagic flux by blocking the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes.
Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. How SARS-CoV-2 regulates cellular responses to escape clearance by host cells is unknown. Autophagy is an intracellular lysosomal degradation pathway for the clearance of various cargoes, including viruses. Here, we systematically screened 28 viral proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and identified that ORF3a strongly inhibited autophagic flux by blocking the fusion of autophagosomes with lysosomes. ORF3a colocalized with lysosomes and interacted with VPS39, a component of the homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS) complex. The ORF3a-VPS39 interaction prohibited the binding of HOPS with RAB7, which prevented the assembly of fusion machinery, leading to the accumulation of unfused autophagosomes. These results indicated the potential mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 escapes degradation; that is, the virus interferes with autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Furthermore, our findings will facilitate strategies targeting autophagy for conferring potential protection against the spread of SARS-CoV-2.

106 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The latest advances in the understanding of the regulating mechanisms and signaling pathways of STING1 in autophagy and cell death are outlined, which may shed light on new targets for therapeutic interventions.
Abstract: Cell death and immune response are at the core of life. In past decades, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) protein STING1 (also known as STING or TMEM173) was found to play a fundamental role in the production of type I interferons (IFNs) and pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to DNA derived from invading microbial pathogens or damaged hosts by activating multiple transcription factors. In addition to this well-known function in infection, inflammation, and immunity, emerging evidence suggests that the STING1-dependent signaling network is implicated in health and disease by regulating autophagic degradation or various cell death modalities (e.g., apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, mitotic cell death, and immunogenic cell death [ICD]). Here, we outline the latest advances in our understanding of the regulating mechanisms and signaling pathways of STING1 in autophagy and cell death, which may shed light on new targets for therapeutic interventions.

78 citations

References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
TL;DR: This chapter describes the fine structure of early and late autophagic compartments in mammalian cells and introduces tomography as a tool to study the three-dimensional morphology of Autophagic organelles.
Abstract: Electron microscopy remains one of the most accurate methods for the detection of autophagy and quantification of autophagic accumulation. Compared to fluorescence microscopy, the resolution of transmission electron microscopy is superior. In this chapter we describe the fine structure of early and late autophagic compartments in mammalian cells. Instructions are given for the preparation of samples for conventional electron microscopy using three different protocols suitable for cultured cells and animal tissues. We also introduce tomography as a tool to study the three-dimensional morphology of autophagic organelles and show the morphology of a phagophore as an example. Finally, we describe a protocol for the quantification of autophagic compartments by electron microscopy and point counting.

253 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Interestingly, tumor cells depleted for Beclin 1 failed to proliferate suggesting that even though the monoallelic depletion of beclin 2 in human cancer cells suppresses EB1089-induced autophagic death, one intact beClin 1 allele is essential for tumor cell proliferation.
Abstract: A chemotherapeutic vitamin D analogue, EB1089, kills tumor cells via a caspase-independent pathway that results in chromatin condensation and DNA fragmentation. Employing transmission- and immunoelectronmicroscopy as well as detection of autophagosome-associated LC3-β protein in the vacuolar structures, we show here that EB1089 also induces massive autophagy in MCF-7 cells. Interestingly, inhibition of autophagy effectively hindered apoptosis-like nuclear changes and cell death in response to EB1089. Furthermore, restoration of normal levels of beclin 1, an autophagy-inducing tumor suppressor gene that is monoallelically deleted in MCF-7 cells, greatly enhanced the EB1089-induced nuclear changes and cell death. Thus, EB1089 triggers nuclear apoptosis via a pathway involving Beclin 1-dependent autophagy. Surprisingly, tumor cells depleted for Beclin 1 failed to proliferate suggesting that even though the monoallelic depletion of beclin 1 in human cancer cells suppresses EB1089-induced autophagic death, one intact beclin 1 allele is essential for tumor cell proliferation.

253 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This research attacked the mode of cell reprograming through a number of mechanisms called “ ‘spatially checkpoints’” and found it to be a simple and efficient process to regulate the number of cells in the immune system.
Abstract: 1 Department of Developmental Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany, 2 Institute of Cell Biology, ZBME, University of Münster, Münster, Germany, 3 Department of Molecular, Cell, and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America, 4 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America, 5 Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America, 6 Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, United States of America, 7 Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 8 The Living Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom, 9 Institute of Cardiovascular Organogenesis and Regeneration, WWU Münster, Faculty of Medicine, Münster, Germany, 10 Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America, 11 Division of Developmental Biology, NICHD, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America, 12 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, 13 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom, 14 Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 15 Departments of Molecular Genetics and Biological Chemistry and Pharmacology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America, 16 Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 17 School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 18 National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Research Institute, Osaka, Japan, 19 Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 20 Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

253 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
20 Aug 2010-Cell
TL;DR: Surprisingly, disrupting ATG12 conjugation to ATG3 does not affect starvation-induced autophagy, and the lack of ATG 12-ATG3 complex formation produces an expansion in mitochondrial mass and inhibits cell death mediated by mitochondrial pathways.

253 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is demonstrated that an ATG1/13 kinase complex analogous to such complexes regulating autophagy in yeast and metazoans exists in Arabidopsis, and it is described and shown that it is both a regulator and a target of Autophagy.
Abstract: Autophagy is an intracellular recycling route in eukaryotes whereby organelles and cytoplasm are sequestered in vesicles, which are subsequently delivered to the vacuole for breakdown. The process is induced by various nutrient-responsive signaling cascades converging on the Autophagy-Related1 (ATG1)/ATG13 kinase complex. Here, we describe the ATG1/13 complex in Arabidopsis thaliana and show that it is both a regulator and a target of autophagy. Plants missing ATG13 are hypersensitive to nutrient limitations and senesce prematurely similar to mutants lacking other components of the ATG system. Synthesis of the ATG12-ATG5 and ATG8-phosphatidylethanolamine adducts, which are essential for autophagy, still occurs in ATG13-deficient plants, but the biogenesis of ATG8-decorated autophagic bodies does not, indicating that the complex regulates downstream events required for autophagosome enclosure and/or vacuolar delivery. Surprisingly, levels of the ATG1a and ATG13a phosphoproteins drop dramatically during nutrient starvation and rise again upon nutrient addition. This turnover is abrogated by inhibition of the ATG system, indicating that the ATG1/13 complex becomes a target of autophagy. Consistent with this mechanism, ATG1a is delivered to the vacuole with ATG8-decorated autophagic bodies. Given its responsiveness to nutrient demands, the turnover of the ATG1/13 kinase likely provides a dynamic mechanism to tightly connect autophagy to a plant’s nutritional status.

253 citations

Trending Questions (2)
How long does it take for body to enter autophagy?

Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms.

What does autophagy do Reddit?

Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway.